jaywalker's "friend" in ww

[rockerrick]

Originally Posted by Jay Walker

You could have had her verified in 10 hours huh? Hmmm. So who are the real pimps around here?

No pimping involved , just know exactly how the system works , and I am known well enough to be credible . And so are you , not sure if you know the hoops to jump thru though ?

[Codybeast]

Originally Posted by Jay Walker

You could have had her verified in 10 hours huh? Hmmm. So who are the real pimps around here?

As RR stated that is how the system works. I vouched for a new provider a couple of years ago and yes it took approx. 10 hours for her to be up and running.

I have no pull here. Just your average monger.

[Guest040415]

I don't know why you guys are quick to burn Jay when he is a reputable member here , as I see it he wasn't vouching for anyone just merely pointing a girl that he knows and that she was available , no one can tell what a girl might do BCD so why blame Jay because of it ?
MM's reasons for not staying with her are in the least dubious , they don't make sense and let me explain , first of all he said that he saw some baggies with some illegal content in the bathroom but if that is the only reason to not see a provider then let me tell you that you are just being naive or ignorant , I would be sure to say that at least 50% of these girls engage on those kind of activities
Secondly he mentioned done teenagers which he never saw any in the room with the provider at the moment if the session so I don't know why he brought that up
If he didnt want to go ahead with the session because he didnt like her looks or felt that the pics were misguiding then that is fair and he was right to stop the session but I don't see the need to blame Jay for that

[MARTlAN]

Originally Posted by Jay Walker

WOW is right! I really can't speculate on your motives, but I hope it's simply some sort of mistake on your part, because it seems quite impossible that we are talking about the same person.

There are no motives behind my post, just sharing information with my fellow hobby brothers, there is no conspiracy against you, I just think it would have been easier if you would have not introduced her as your friend, when I read your post I assumed you were vouching for her, normally when someone introduces a lady into our community they are basically saying they are ok, now if you would have posted, "I just met this lady that wants to get into the hobby, but I do not know her that well, just letting you guys know that she is looking for business" then I would have most likely not even met her, but since you mentioned her as a friend and even posted after her number had changed you posted her new number I assumed she was good to go see, I guess not.

First of all, I didn't "recommend" her. I introduced her because she wasn't able to do so herself. I offered what little information I was aware of and did not speculate.

I checked her into that room for a reason that i care not to discuss. when i left, the room was as it was when I checked her in, save her cigarette smoke and unmade bed. What happened there after that, I can't say and wouldn't speculate.

During the short time that I spent with her, I never saw any evidence suggesting the use or abuse of anything prescribed or otherwise.

The photo that I posted, I took moments before I introduced her in WW. I've attached another that I took but did not post. Similar but notice the differences. To suggest that the poor quality photo I posted is not the person that you met says that you didn't meet the same person that I did. That photo was only minutes old.

Kids? Assumptions on your part or can you substantiate that? I can substantiate why this is virtually impossible.

No not an assumption, read my post, SHE SAID, that the room was a mess because she was watching some kids, then she paused and said I mean I was watching some teenagers, I never said I saw kids or teen s in room, I SAID that she said that, now did I explain myself?????????

If you'd like to clear this up, please:

Say how many words comprised the hotel name?

Was there anything unique about her voice and if so, what?

What floor was the room on?

You mentioned being in the bathroom. Was it entered to the left or right of the main room?

Please answer these questions. I can actually prove the answers.



[ATACH]222410[/ATTACH]

Originally Posted by Jay Walker

I've never vouched for anyone. Vouch = recommendation. I just try to provide what facts and personal interactions that I've experienced.

You could have had her verified in 10 hours huh? Hmmm. So who are the real pimps around here?

I'm actually shocked at the amount of attention given to a single few sentence post introducing a girl who wanted to take call. A lot of folks are quite protective of this little territory and they're regular girls.

The Martian has certainly added fuel to the fire, but so far he has failed to substantiate any of it.

Things that make you go Hmmmm?

Really, adding fuel to the fire? LMFAO, I really don't care if you believe me or not, I don't know you or give 2 cents about you, but I really was trying to do was let my hobby brothers know so that they can decide for themselves to see her or not.

Originally Posted by F1 Fan

I don't know why you guys are quick to burn Jay when he is a reputable member here , as I see it he wasn't vouching for anyone just merely pointing a girl that he knows and that she was available , no one can tell what a girl might do BCD so why blame Jay because of it ?
MM's reasons for not staying with her are in the least dubious , they don't make sense and let me explain , first of all he said that he saw some baggies with some illegal content in the bathroom but if that is the only reason to not see a provider then let me tell you that you are just being naive or ignorant , I would be sure to say that at least 50% of these girls engage on those kind of activities
Secondly he mentioned done teenagers which he never saw any in the room with the provider at the moment if the session so I don't know why he brought that up
If he didnt want to go ahead with the session because he didnt like her looks or felt that the pics were misguiding then that is fair and he was right to stop the session but I don't see the need to blame Jay for that

Now this genius really makes me laugh, Again read my post, I never said I saw kids or teens, I said that she said that, got it? Should I write it in crayons and perhaps it will be easier for you to read???? Anyways, I have some experience in the hobby and sometimes you just get the feeling that is not a good idea to stay and when you get some obvious signs you walk away, now if that's your kind of party and you are use to seeing, mirrors with straws and empty baggies with your providers then I would say you stick to your backpage girls and maybe they don't mind when you are trying to sneak in a bareback session by taking off cover while provider is not looking, yea I heard, I'm surprised that provider didn't warn other ladies about you.

[Guest040415]

Just because you have a zillion reviews that doesn't make you right , why mention the teenagers then if you saw no one there ? I never say that you saw any teenagers there just that mentioned , anyway what that has to do with you not staying for the session ?

[shayla84]

How about she gets verified like the rest of us do, sounds like to me shes way off living out of hotel, motels. Sounds like also the classic strung out hooker that works enough to pay her motel and drug fix, wouldnt be surprised if she wasnt also infested with something when girls get that desprate to start begging for money to pay for rooms and all they will more then likely bb ya or what ever you want just to get that quick doe.
Wanna help her clean her ass up and tell her to get her ass up and work like the rest of us do, nothings free in this world.

[MARTlAN]

Originally Posted by F1 Fan

Just because you have a zillion reviews that doesn't make you right , why mention the teenagers then if you saw no one there ? I never say that you saw any teenagers there just that mentioned , anyway what that has to do with you not staying for the session ? You are just desilusional
And for the last paragraph of your post, that is funny , I heard exactly the same thing about you with a provider

Correction sir, that is a zillion and 23 reviews, how many zeros in a zillion? And there is no way a provider told you that I did the same thing, because i'm supper sneaky like a ninja and can take off cover then put back on with lightning speed. Lol. You made me giggle so hard I precame a little in my shorts. Hehe. You should post more often. Anyway I'm done with this thread, I have an appointment with a cute 22 year old. Happy Hobbying

[Guest040415]

I will take on your advice and post more often , same thing happens to me , I'm a ninja also so there is no way a provider told you that about me , anyway enjoy your 22 years old , I'm out of this thread too

[Jay Walker]

Martian, you are making some pretty significant accusations here. I'm just confused and in the interest of information sharing wouldn't it be helpful to let people know if we are both talking about the girl that I introduced versus two different people? If you are going to roast me for posting this girls name and number(s), why not validate your accusations and help us all figure out whether we are even talking about the same person?

Why will you not answer the questions that I asked?

If you'd like to clear this up, please:

Say how many words comprised the hotel name?

Was there anything unique about her voice and if so, what?

What floor was the room on?

You mentioned being in the bathroom. Was it entered to the left or right of the main room?

Please answer these questions.

[fun2come]

For that to work you both would have to PM the answers to a trusted party, who will NOT share it with either one and then post the results.

I am happy to volunteer, if you both think me impartial in this debate.

[Spacemtn]

It would appear that the plot thickens. Based on this:
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=760290

It would appear that Jay's new friend is already a member here.

Spacemtn
AustinModStaff

[Jay Walker]

Originally Posted by fun2come

For that to work you both would have to PM the answers to a trusted party, who will NOT share it with either one and then post the results.

I am happy to volunteer, if you both think me impartial in this debate.

I'd gladly provide the answers to an impartial person. I'm just interested in figuring out the truth. If the Martian answers the questions, and it turns out that we are referring to the same girl, people, including myself should know.

I find Space trustworthy. Hell, I'll send space the answers now.

Originally Posted by Spacemtn

It would appear that the plot thickens. Based on this:
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=760290

It would appear that Jay's new friend is already a member here.

Spacemtn
AustinModStaff

Someone using her likeness is a member here. Based on what I was told, and facts I know to be true, the gist of which I have shared with you privately Space, I don't believe that she personally has ever been here.

[Pflugerbill]

The term "he would argue with a fencepost" comes to mind.

Originally Posted by Jay Walker

I'd gladly provide the answers to an impartial person. I'm just interested in figuring out the truth. If the Martian answers the questions, and it turns out that we are referring to the same girl, people, including myself should know.

I find Space trustworthy. Hell, I'll send space the answers now.



Someone using her likeness is a member here. Based on what I was told, and facts I know to be true, the gist of which I have shared with you privately Space, I don't believe that she personally has ever been here.

[78704]

-

[Michael_Loomis]

Just the fact that she was watching kids or teens in the same hotel room she was providing in and also evidence found in the bathroom is enough for an alert. If you get caught there, it isn't a simple "john getting busted" or what ever, you'll get child endangerment and all the things that go along with that.

Scary stuff.