are you writing WORTHLESS reviews?

[Guest022315]

Originally Posted by Namssa

I trust all reviews where the reviewer has brought the lady to at least 30 orgasms.

Oh and Ditto what Tinman said.

Fixed
In all honesty, worthless or informative reviews really doesn't matter. Truth is when junior wants a particular lady come hell and high water he will get his way It's only after we either think fuck yeah or what the fuck was i thinking and review or stay silent about it. Imho all ladies are ymmv and I dont expect to get the exact same services presented in a review.

[Genosha]

Originally Posted by Von Spieler

It may be salty but that's not caramel syrup.

On another note - TinMan and Rex, still-asleep you are all correct. Review the experience and gal so we have an idea if we want or need to invest the time & money to see her. I don't care if you fell in love with her eyes while disapearing in her blah blah blah.

Was she good, on time, pimped, crazy, clock watcher, etc. If it was a good experience and warrants a "yes" then yes. If it was a horrible experience or things went wrong then it warrants a "no".

However sometimes it's nice for the reviews to be entertaining.

[daty/o]

This is a great venue and you can get what you look for. We obviously have some terrific fiction writers here; you know who they are and we all enjoy them for their entertainment value. For credible information? Not so much. There are also many reviews that provide a wealth of valuable information, but are so boring to read, that we are almost afraid to see the provider that warranted it. Writing a review that bridges the gap between the two can be a real challenge. I'm just glad that so many actually take the time to make the effort. Tinman's advice is excellent. It's good to let the big head rely on a few fellow hobbyists that you trust, and that perhaps share your proclivities, to provide reliable information and allow the little head to enjoy the rest.

[sticknrudder1]

Worthless Reviews? Fuck, I'd settle for decent titles at this point. We are all so damned creative, yet many can't seem to work the gal's name into their incredibly witty title.
From my side, I'd prefer provider name and yea/nay rec right up top in the title to decide if it merits further reading.

[Guest102816-1]

Originally Posted by Sir Lancehernot

I hope that my repeat reviews serve to remind some guys about someone worth seeing and maybe stimulate some interest among people who haven't heard about her before because no new reviews have been written in a month.

Excellent point. And yes it does.

[makmak]

Here is a perfect example.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=657898

[Superlark]

Worthless review when
- does not include provider name in the title.
- the link does not work, so you do not have any clue who the provider is especially Bp providers.
Guys include pix of ad is so easy. Press Prntscr key or use chrome or Firefox browser then install extension to capture the screen and then edit the photo and attach it in your reply. An iPhone user can take screenshot by pressing the home button and the on/off button at the same time. In Mac: press Command-Shift-3.
Good luck.

[phildo]

I put this out there every opportunity I see, and this is another one.

Reviews should be closed to response. They are what they are. Anything else is a waste of bandwidth. Good, Bad, Elmore Leonard or Charles Dickens, A Dilbert strip or Moby Dick, lick it, seal it, post it, done. No further commentary needed.

[john_deere]

Originally Posted by Rex Goliath

a review of provider that goes something like this: "she is Aphrodite in human form! perfect skin, great muscle tone, tits that were so perfect they looked fake but felt real! when I went down on her, her juices tasted like honeysuckle! I spread her lips apart to find her pussy was made of gold with a platinum clit! I licked her asshole and it tasted like salted caramel syrup! her eye contact had me in a trance and she smelled like sweet roses!"

so far, this is great. but then...

no. it's actually the subjective review hero penthouse letter garbage that's a waste of time.

[pmdelites]

Originally Posted by makmak

Here is a perfect example.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=657898

a perfect example of what??
a good review, a outstanding review, a boring review, a worthless review, a totally unbelievable review??

seriously, a perfect example of ..... ?

[Bigdog9]

Ive been told.. so many fake reviews, its just the way it is, but it does get u stimulated.

[hookem69horns]

ThatDude is so very right. In the end, a Review in and of itself has never given rise to me seeing a lady. Her ads and pictures, and Reviews by a guy or guys that I know and trust ... and then just my gut feeling dictate whom I will see ... it all adds up, but when it is all said and done, no two guys will ever have the exact same experience, and just because some guy had a great experience with her is absolutely no guarantee yours will be the same ... YMMV is something lost on a lot of newbies and sophomores.

After a while you know whose Reviews are worthless and skip them ... including the guy that talks to her for a while, showers, goes through 27 different positions busting 3-4 nuts all over her face, and then they cuddle for a while, have another drink and talk some more, then his hour is up and he leaves.

It would be great in a perfect world but has been, and will always be, an imperfect system.