Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
650 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Jon Bon |
400 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
Starscream66 |
282 |
You&Me |
281 |
George Spelvin |
270 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70831 | biomed1 | 63764 | Yssup Rider | 61304 | gman44 | 53377 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48840 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 43221 | The_Waco_Kid | 37431 | CryptKicker | 37231 | Mokoa | 36497 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
11-29-2011, 10:33 PM
|
#16
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGiz
Are you actually attempting to obfuscate the blatantly obvious left bias of the New York Times? The bias of their book reviews? There is no such thing as an unbiased book review. Reporting news!!!! Book Reviews!!!!! Learn the fucking difference.* Are you denying it?
THAT... was pretty much, the OP's point.
Attempting to cover it up with AOL polls taken in Mississippi does not impress anyone! I can make a poll's results say anything I want it to. So what?
|
You can? Then make those numbers say something else. Slan the real numbers any way you want.
Get on it. Now.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-29-2011, 10:37 PM
|
#17
|
BANNED
Join Date: Feb 9, 2015
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 11,947
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
Some feel giving an example of being racist is an attempt at getting a racist reaction out of the closet racists.
Looks like it worked again.
He'll have you trying every possible combination of words and ideas to get your point across and thus divert you from ever getting an answer out of him.
The "I know you are but what am I?" strategy. He will never directly answer your question or acknowledge you have a valid point.
Cause he's just sayin'.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
You can? Then make those numbers say something else. Slan the real numbers any way you want.
Get on it. Now.
|
I gave a one word answer... did it escape you?
Thank You, for your assistance, Munch. . . as usual... you've done a fine job!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-29-2011, 11:34 PM
|
#18
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
I'd like to see a poll by a reputable polling company before deciding that 46% of the people in Mississippi are racist. Also, while opposing interracial marriage certainly has racist roots, it's not the same as lynching or burning crosses. In fact, (tongue in cheek) 46% might indicate a trend toward tolerance among Mississippians. Just sayin'.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-29-2011, 11:58 PM
|
#19
|
Professional Tush Hog.
Join Date: Mar 27, 2009
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 8,969
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGiz
Are you actually attempting to obfuscate the blatantly obvious left bias of the New York Times? * Are you denying it?
|
Absolutely I deny it. This is the newspaper that all but sucked George Bush and Dick Cheney's dicks during the war in Iraq. Through the now widely discredited reporting of Judith Miller and Michael Gordon they became nothing more than mouthpieces for government propaganda. They just repeated any lie that the administration wanted them to tell. All for a little access to supposedly "inside" information -- all of which was nothing but lies.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/may/29/iraq.usa1
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...at_melted.html
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/media/features/9226/
Likewise, they ignored the Bush administration running up budgets that had they occurred in a Democratic administration under similar circumstances, would have elicited howls of outrage.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-30-2011, 12:02 AM
|
#20
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGiz
I gave a one word answer... did it escape you?
Thank You, for your assistance, Munch. . . as usual... you've done a fine job!
|
You said nothing...as usual.
And dodged,........as usual, not knowing the difference between book reports and AP reports.
And no thanks needed. Anyone could refute you with equal ease.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-30-2011, 12:10 AM
|
#22
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
I'd like to see a poll by a reputable polling company before deciding that 46% of the people in Mississippi are racist. Also, while opposing interracial marriage certainly has racist roots, it's not the same as lynching or burning crosses. In fact, (tongue in cheek) 46% might indicate a trend toward tolerance among Mississippians. Just sayin'.
|
Guardian?
You ask for reputable? Let's put that aside for a moment.
If it certainly has racist roots, does it matter they aren't lynching or burning crosses? When does it cross a line?
When is it too much for you to have an asshole's back for him?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-30-2011, 12:10 AM
|
#23
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
I'm not disputing the poll, I'd just like to see a Pew Research, or some unbiased polling company do the same poll. I don't know how the questions were worded, or what else went on in the poll. You can make a poll say anything you want by who you select as your subjects, and how you word the questions. PPP is a company with a liberal bias. All I'm saying is I'm reserving judgment until a more reputable firm does the survey.
And besides, TTH, you promised long ago to provide me proof that the Tea Party was racist. I still haven't seen it.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-30-2011, 01:18 AM
|
#24
|
Professional Tush Hog.
Join Date: Mar 27, 2009
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 8,969
|
If this poll doesn't show it, I have no idea what you want. The Tea Party is the Republican Party. Period.
And a link to the questions and cross tabs are listed in the articles I posted.
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/p...MS_0407915.pdf
Q14 is the one on interracial marriage.
Do you think interracial marriage should be
legal or illegal?
Legal......................... .............................. ........ 40%
Illegal .............................. .............................. .. 46%
Not sure .............................. ............................ 14%
Sounds pretty biased to me!!!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-30-2011, 01:21 AM
|
#25
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
The poll shows nothing, for the reasons stated before. You can't prove up your point. I don't even like the Tea Party, but they are not racist. Ignorant, yes. Racist, no.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-30-2011, 01:24 AM
|
#26
|
Professional Tush Hog.
Join Date: Mar 27, 2009
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 8,969
|
So the 43 percent of the Republican Party that are racists just happen to be the few Republicans (who otherwise reason would suggest would be the most moderate Republicans) who don't support the Tea Party movement? On what basis can you possibly conclude that? Only moderate Republicans are racists??!!!!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-30-2011, 01:36 AM
|
#27
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
Get over it, TTH. A left leaning poll proves nothing. The article doesn't even mention the Tea Party. It is innuendo, and would never pass as evidence in court. You know better than this. You just get off on shouting "Racist" when you can't think of anything else to say. It's obvious that you have a lot of latent racist tendencies, that you try to cover by trying to appear indignant.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-30-2011, 01:55 AM
|
#28
|
Professional Tush Hog.
Join Date: Mar 27, 2009
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 8,969
|
Tea Party = Republican
Republican = 43% Racist
Tea Party = 43% Racist
QED
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-30-2011, 01:59 AM
|
#29
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
I give up. Rest comfortably in your superiority.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
11-30-2011, 02:23 AM
|
#30
|
Gaining Momentum
Join Date: Nov 14, 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 38
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGiz
Are you actually attempting to obfuscate the blatantly obvious left bias of the New York Times? * Are you denying it?
THAT... was pretty much, the OP's point.
|
Yes I'm denying it, if you mean on the news pages
their editorial bias is left.
just like the WSJ's editorial bias is way right.
but both report the NEWS impartially as they can
unlike Faux News, which is pure propaganda wall to wall
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|