Rule 1… We Don’t talk about Fight Club in Amps

[Billogoods]

Here is the main point:

Explicit details in the public area brings more non-contributing mongers. The increase in traffic brings scrutiny and reports of illegal activities. Reports of illegal activities brings LE.

As for LE, if LE wants info on a place, they want explicit info. Ambiguous "code" is useless to prove illegal activity in a court. It may get their attention. It may get them watching a shop. But, they can't build a strong case on "oral dissertation". They need "I fucked her for $140" to get started. But, they still need real evidence.

Innocent until proven guilty.

If you disagree, just say so. But, there's no need to be calling people out and linking past reviews. Just let your word be your word. That's good enough. I respect that.

And, NO, I will NOT massage Chung.

[zeeman195]

I have been visiting AMPs since 1998. I was lucky to experience the golden age of the Dallas Amp scene.
Just before the shut downs I have been going to a certain establishment for several years now. They have seriously requested NO reiviews.
I will always respect their wishes.
This is their livelyhood, plus I am friends with one of the owners.

I respect everone's opinions here.
I feel an exchange of ligitimate info in PM is the way to go.
If you would like to exchange info then PM me.

Just my 2 pennies worth.

[Big b.o.b.1]

From here on out, I will limit my reviews, including tonight's Studio review of Tiny, to "see ROS". Mainly because Heartside likes to get free Intel without giving any, lol

[Billogoods]

One thing that I have experienced is that some of the Mods have rejected my reviews for "lack of Activities". One was rejected because I did not explicitly say what happened in ROS. A couple of L0 reviews were rejected, as well, for the same stated reason.

As for explicit language, I believe that it is unnecessary. If LE can figger it out, mongers can, too. And, it contributes to LE's efforts to stop consenting adults from enjoying life, by removing any doubt about what transpired. And, language is important, in that aspect. Any CHL carrier can tell you there's a huge difference, legally speaking, between "I stopped the threat" and "I killed his sorry ass." And, the same is true with "She took care of my knots" versus "She jerked me off."

Also, I disagree that an L0 review is not worthy of PA, since the stated purpose of the site is the "exchange of information". An L0 review is just as valuable, if not more than those with activities, as it saves others time/money. That's good information, IMO.

But, I'm not a Mod. They have to deal with all the stupid shit that goes on, like "He's a Promoter" threads (what a waste of bandwidth, IMHO). And, they volunteer their time to do it. Not a job I want. So, I defer.

[CaptainTime]

Yeah, I just got hit with the No Credit because "no activities". Seems like the rules have changed recently. I really appreciate those that TOFFT and find a new place, take a chance to find out there's only LO. It does save me time and $.

[aJohnDough]

“Private groups sharing exclusively via PM is a good solution, I believe. Further measures such as hiding explicit activities in only ROS Private tags are also effective. Needlessly to say they're got going to prevent law enforcement 100% of the time, but they definitely deter and especially prevent unwanted attention from non-contributing lurkers and Karens that are everywhere in Texas nowadays. Finally, respecting the wishes of the AMPs and our girls should be placed on a little higher emphasis.

Guaranteeing the safety of these shops is guaranteeing our safety. Practice your discretion”


******Maybe we can start a private Discord or Telegram for well established users… I’d be down for that

[cosoj]

A good description of her appearance and attitude gives the reader an idea if the woman is worthy of a visit. Roll the dice, where is your sense of adventure

[cosoj]

A good description of her appearance and attitude gives the reader an idea if the woman is worthy of a visit. Roll the dice, where is your sense of adventure

[zeeman195]

I like the idea of Discord as well, but who's to say the Leos won't be ignoring this avenue as well.
I wish they would worry about more important things in this city that effect people on a daily basis, like people getting shot.

I'm with the Jedi Master Bill-O, things have changed and we have to change with it. Roll with the punches as it were. Maybe this site has run it's course.
It might be time for the true mongers to go elsewhere with intel and info.

[BobbyC50]

100% agree. I was using the term “She gave me a $50 water bottle” and was not given credit. Let’s be a bit looser and let us be a bit more cryptic.

Originally Posted by Billogoods

One thing that I have experienced is that some of the Mods have rejected my reviews for "lack of Activities". One was rejected because I did not explicitly say what happened in ROS. A couple of L0 reviews were rejected, as well, for the same stated reason.

As for explicit language, I believe that it is unnecessary. If LE can figger it out, mongers can, too. And, it contributes to LE's efforts to stop consenting adults from enjoying life, by removing any doubt about what transpired. And, language is important, in that aspect. Any CHL carrier can tell you there's a huge difference, legally speaking, between "I stopped the threat" and "I killed his sorry ass." And, the same is true with "She took care of my knots" versus "She jerked me off."

Also, I disagree that an L0 review is not worthy of PA, since the stated purpose of the site is the "exchange of information". An L0 review is just as valuable, if not more than those with activities, as it saves others time/money. That's good information, IMO.

But, I'm not a Mod. They have to deal with all the stupid shit that goes on, like "He's a Promoter" threads (what a waste of bandwidth, IMHO). And, they volunteer their time to do it. Not a job I want. So, I defer.

[ntxguy]

Originally Posted by Billogoods

Here is the main point:

Explicit details in the public area brings more non-contributing mongers. The increase in traffic brings scrutiny and reports of illegal activities. Reports of illegal activities brings LE.

As for LE, if LE wants info on a place, they want explicit info. Ambiguous "code" is useless to prove illegal activity in a court. It may get their attention. It may get them watching a shop. But, they can't build a strong case on "oral dissertation". They need "I fucked her for $140" to get started. But, they still need real evidence.

Innocent until proven guilty.

If you disagree, just say so. But, there's no need to be calling people out and linking past reviews. Just let your word be your word. That's good enough. I respect that.

And, NO, I will NOT massage Chung.

I wasn't bashing you or anyone else like I said in my post. I was illustrating the quandary we have in figuring out what is best to do..

And yes you will have to massage Chung when you lose our Grand Prix of DFW AMPS, sponsored by Yugo of course, as well as write a very detailed review of your encounter from the therapist prospective.

[Cheburashka]

Bill-O is super smart. As are others on this board. So some of the newbs here should learn to read what is NOT mentioned in a review. There are volumes written between the lines. And some gentlemen on this board would never put up a level 0 review. So if they do, you can bank on the fact that it wasn't level 0 session. That's what will initiate a PM communication chain. The SubAMP world is golden right now. And if a lady learns that she can trust you, mutually beneficial sessions happen all the time. Learn from dancers. When rent is due the dances get better and better. There is nothing new under the sun. Also, if a gent here who normally posts frequently suddenly hasn't put up a review in a while, you can bet he has found a gold mine and is not posting about it. Just a tip from your Uncle Cheb.

[vigilant17]

Cheb, I fully agree with you - especially about how smart Billo is. Your point is right on.

Assume we are visiting Chinese restaurants. Or nail salons, haha. There are very few differences. You are getting a service and if she likes you, she will ensure you get a meal off the special menu, but the chef won't cook the special menu unless he is persuaded. You tip. You need to behave, you make her laugh, you need to give her the confidence that things could be long term and profitable and you get the special menu.

Where you want to go back to that restaurant and continue with the special menu, experience variation in that menu, continue to get top service, she cannot have people walking in demanding special menu meals, or hear anything negative about the food taste, or that the other waitress served it better. Even selecting the time of your visit to be convenient to her helps a lot.

You don't want the restaurant to go out of business, so you have to advertise to other people an awareness of the excellence that the restaurant can deliver without pointing out the special menu that you enjoy.

The guys on this forum who walk in and literally get the full service special menu in shop after shop also take care of themselves, look good, are fun to be with, focus very much on the lady, tip appropriately, and keep their mouths shut about the details.

These same guys and techniques will pick up a hot waitress from the corner restaurant just the same. The winning position here is to write a review that tells a lot but spells out nothing. Billo has great style.

[london2012]

I thought we had a L0 thread before. Maybe we can just add the name of the provider and place whenever we encounter a L0.

[Cali-or-Bust]

#you don’t talk about fight club, yet here we are….talking about fight club. Leo is watching and they know what all the letters mean. I take the risk just like the next joe, but when the hammer falls, and it will, be prepared.
Monger wisely my friends