Quote:
Originally Posted by Lapdog
If someone qualified would put up enough proof of fraud that would change the outcome, I would embrace it and own it. If not, well just STFU, because you don't have shit.
|
Describe the proof that you would accept as evidence of fraud? That's the problem. The democrats, who have been claiming fraud for the last four years, are now moving the goal posts. First, it was there is no fraud, we've been lying for the last four years. Then was there was incompetence but that's not fraud. Which became, there was fraud but not enough to change the outcome of the election (which election? We've had some congressional candidates win after being declared the loser) to we want hard evidence of fraud which we now admit to but we're going to do a Bart Simpson, No one saw me do it, so I didn't do it, and no one can prove anything.
