Quote:
Originally Posted by Fsn57
Thanks for the report. Ignore the WK's. They weren't there. Just because the experience may have been different for them doesn't mean what was reported here didn't happen.
JR, you weren't there,
Of course, I wasn't there. None of us were.
so your statement is irrelevant here.
|
My statement is extremely relevant because I have not questioned his experience. What has been questioned is his statements where he described the physical appearance of the woman.
His description of Lacey is not the description of Lacey816. Lacey816 has teeth. She is not the woman he described. That is the problem with his statements. Please note that his experience was not questioned.
I was not the only one who questioned if he had the right woman.
Jumping in and calling one a WK ignores what has been questioned which makes the WK stuff irrivalent.
So, in conclusion: unless Lacey816 has lost her teeth since I last time saw her (unlikely). The statements that she did this horrible thing are still questioned.
Unless someone can prove that Lacey816 has lost her teeth. We have proved that this accusation against her is wrong, and intentional. It should be delt with as an attack on a respected member of the community.