Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
LL seems lacking on details.
Just how does he propose stopping them in Mexico?
Is he advocating our military invade Mexico? Or have our AF bomb the caravan?
Maybe Trump will let Mexico keep the money they were going to pay him to build that wall and ise it yo house and feed these 7 year old 'invaders'.  |
Please direct my attention to a post of mine in which I was "advocating" .... then once you can't ..... please move on. Unfortunately the "hair on fire" response to a suggestion of protecting our borders is either born from an extreme bias or a failure to adequately comprehend the concepts of "mutual assistance" in matters of common borders. A "conversation" dated over a decade ago is informative:
[IMG]From a practical perspective, Mexico's decision to quit the TIAR likely will not have a significant impact on bilateral U.S.-Mexico cooperation on border security issues like controlling illegal immigration, drug trafficking and the entry of potential terrorists into the United States. These issues always have been managed as non-military political matters that do not come under the purview of the TIAR, which was designed as a defense pact against armed aggressors from outside the Western Hemisphere.[/IMG]
https://worldview.stratfor.com/artic...onal-precedent
THE FACT of the matter is Mexico and the U.S. have had "mutual assistance" for decades and Mexico during consecutive Mexican administrations for decades have "ALLOWED" not only U.S. troops but Federal, State, and Local LE as well, to enter Mexico for a variety of reasons: training, assistance, cooperation, and intelligence gathering. Does anyone actually believe I35 was extended to Laredo for "tourism"?
FYI: The original function of service roads (renamed "access roads" in order to prevent hysteria) was for the purpose of local usage when the Feds were using the "main slab" to move personnel, equipment, and materiel TO THE U.S.-MEXICAN BORDER in a time of national emergency.
All this hysteria about the U.S. invading, doing "strikes," and the like is just that: hysteria and the typical Liberal chant to carry options to an illogical conclusion in order to attempt to posture themselves in adult discussions and to quiet the opposition. It's not FACT BASED.
LL is NOT "lacking in details." On the contrary ....
