Encounter: SAME OLD TRICKS BY TARA EVANS, A NO

[Bflexible]

[dmode]

Lmao. What a fucking shit show.

Bravo lads. That’s entertainment.

[tom51]

So on my first return to eccie the 1st review that get my attention is TARA EVANS! LMFAO she is horrible unless she likes you and those apparently are few. The first time I saw her she was OK just OK but she squirted like a water fountain and my pervert self enjoyed time although rushed and next time sucked and why am I wasting my time writing about this bitch well read between the lines BEWARE!!

[bennie]

So she pissed on you the 1st time and later visit just pissed you off.

[hookem69horns]

Threatening to call the cops because she didn’t do BBFS and some other stuff .. you may win Douchebag of the Year, and got what you deserved - a suspension.Now he will just change his name, join ECCIE again, as the same douchebag. That’s why the MOD’s must find a way to privately identify men (and women) when suspending them so they can never come back.

[PeterBota]

Originally Posted by hookem69horns

Threatening to call the cops because she didn’t do BBFS and some other stuff .. you may win Douchebag of the Year, and got what you deserved - a suspension.Now he will just change his name, join ECCIE again, as the same douchebag. That’s why the MOD’s must find a way to privately identify men (and women) when suspending them so they can never come back.

you have lost your mind. “Privately identify “

[txexetoo]

Originally Posted by tom51

So on my first return to eccie the 1st review that get my attention is TARA EVANS! LMFAO she is horrible unless she likes you and those apparently are few. The first time I saw her she was OK just OK but she squirted like a water fountain and my pervert self enjoyed time although rushed and next time sucked and why am I wasting my time writing about this bitch well read between the lines BEWARE!!

I am confused. You said your first visit with her was only ok and the second one sucked. Going back through your postings you have nothing but praise and well wishes. So which is it? She sucks or she is the best ever? Which of your postings are true?

[Hank3fan]

I guess I don’t understand why he got banned and she didn’t. They both made egregious mistakes. But at least he didn’t post private correspondence in full view of the public. Which she did do.

Don’t get me wrong what he did was a shitty thing. But as far as anyone knows it was just an idol threat by an angry guy that felt burned. And on top of that he didn’t do it on here so how does that warrant a suspension? What someone does with their private correspondence outside of this website shouldn’t be an actionable offense by the higher ups here.
(If that’s the case then some of things I’ve said to my cell phone service provider will get me banned for life.lol)

On the other hand she made public private info in direct conflict to the rules of this site. Yet she is allowed to remain with nothing more than a minor citation. Doesn’t make sense to me. Seems what’s good for the goose is not necessarily good for the gander.

I don’t know either one of them so it doesn’t directly affect me. But a clarification on the rules is all I’m wondering about.

[Chung Tran]

Originally Posted by tom51

So on my first return to eccie the 1st review that get my attention is TARA EVANS! LMFAO she is horrible unless she likes you and those apparently are few. The first time I saw her she was OK just OK but she squirted like a water fountain and my pervert self enjoyed time although rushed and next time sucked and why am I wasting my time writing about this bitch well read between the lines BEWARE!!

to be fair, the review you saw was bogus, and has been shown to be.. so your jumping in to heap shit on Tara is disingenuous. not to mention you have enjoyed her multiple times, and your post history reveals that.. AND.. not done yet.. you say "why am I wasting my time writing about this Bitch", and tell us to read between the lines.. what does that mean? the original (and banned) reviewer said something similar.. he was "only" writing the review "because she's a Bitch".. in other words, he made that shit up, which was proven after he wrote it. if the account was factual, he would write the review for us to glean knowledge, not for spite.

Originally Posted by Hank3fan

I guess I don’t understand why he got banned and she didn’t. They both made egregious mistakes. But at least he didn’t post private correspondence in full view of the public. Which she did do.

my take is Tara is the attacked, hitting back at the Aggressor. sort of like when Israel launches missiles at the Palestinians, and there is collateral damage.. and the World Press condemns Israel.. well, Israel was REACTING to attacks made on it, and it's citizens. qualitative difference. maybe she responded out of order, but that doesn't mean the punishment should be equal.. it was already posted that she was awarded an infraction.

[jollyroger]

eccie is a shit show! BRAVO SAM!

[Bflexible]

Originally Posted by tom51

why am I wasting my time writing about this bitch well read between the lines BEWARE!!

Hmmm, why are you, tom51?
tom51 = sammalone69?

Chung Tran and txexetoo may have noticed first, and referenced your previous positive post about Tara Evans (dated 8/28/2014 attached). sammalone69 may also be posting under another handle at The E (multiple handles). The first review that gets your attention is this review, and your first post since returning to The E is a comment on this grudge review about Tara.

I have a screenshot of Tara Evan's post containing a private message from sammalone69 to Tara wherein sammalone69 uses the same *exact* words to disparage her as you have used.

tom51, sammalone69 said that he also saw Tara once before this review. sammalone69 also favors ALL CAPS. Your post also uses ALL CAPS freely. Both of you post using handles with all lowercase letters followed by two numbers.

Did you post as tom51 here because you can no longer post under the banned handle sammalone69, tom51?

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

you say "why am I wasting my time writing about this Bitch", and tell us to read between the lines.. what does that mean? the original (and banned) reviewer said something similar.. he was "only" writing the review "because she's a Bitch".. in other words, he made that shit up, which was proven after he wrote it.

Originally Posted by tom51

why am I wasting my time writing about this bitch well read between the lines BEWARE!!

[hardthrob]

Originally Posted by tom51

So on my first return to eccie the 1st review that get my attention is TARA EVANS! LMFAO she is horrible unless she likes you and those apparently are few. The first time I saw her she was OK just OK but she squirted like a water fountain and my pervert self enjoyed time although rushed and next time sucked and why am I wasting my time writing about this bitch well read between the lines BEWARE!!

Wasnt that bad if you left a "YES" on her review after seeing her.

[Guest121018]

I like Tara, just wish she could handle that big D a little better. Lol

[unknown1647]

At this point, whoever see's her deserves whatever they get. At best its a YMMV. Although seems like for newbies chances are it might not be the best bang for your buck.

[BobbyMann]

Forgive me if I missed something, but where does he say he called the cops on her or was going to do so? I didn't see that in the review . . . but motor and several in subsequent posts refer to that (?)