What Does Low Volume Mean?

[burkalini]

Ladies don't take offense but after all the years I have been in and out of this hobby I can honestly say it's still the wallet. Luxie I think your very pretty and probably hot as fuck in bed but why do you escort. " supplemental income" In other words the wallet. If you see one a week it's still about the wallet. There is nothing wrong with that. I don't look for emotional support from the hobby. I'm not looking for a "Girlfriend" in the hobby. I'm looking for a good sexual time. Your looking for a wallet . It's a match made in-well don't want to use that word for the hobby. Everything else is just smoke.

[FLReWrite]

Originally Posted by burkalini

Ladies don't take offense but after all the years I have been in and out of this hobby I can honestly say it's still the wallet. Luxie I think your very pretty and probably hot as fuck in bed but why do you escort. " supplemental income" In other words the wallet. If you see one a week it's still about the wallet. There is nothing wrong with that. I don't look for emotional support from the hobby. I'm not looking for a "Girlfriend" in the hobby. I'm looking for a good sexual time. Your looking for a wallet . It's a match made in-well don't want to use that word for the hobby. Everything else is just smoke.

^^^^^^^^^^^^YES. READ THIS TWICE EVERYONE^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[yitzchak]

Originally Posted by gentlemantoo

Btw words have consistent meanings throughout the English language, if not we would never understand each other. Some words are meant to be vague, like low volume. Lake Michigan is low volume when compared to Pacific Ocean. Meant to be vague because if she states only see 3 guys a week and never on same day, she can get caught lying and that is bad business, so she says low volume keeping it vague. Just another term I disregard as bullshit when shopping.

It's not vague. It's relative. Something that is small is relative to something that is big. But, if something is really, really, really small. Then, it is fundamentally small. It is no longer relatively small. It is absolutely small. Low volume can also be absolute in the limit as it approaches zero.

[papadee]

Originally Posted by burkalini

Ladies don't take offense but after all the years I have been in and out of this hobby I can honestly say it's still the wallet. Luxie I think your very pretty and probably hot as fuck in bed but why do you escort. " supplemental income" In other words the wallet. If you see one a week it's still about the wallet. There is nothing wrong with that. I don't look for emotional support from the hobby. I'm not looking for a "Girlfriend" in the hobby. I'm looking for a good sexual time. Your looking for a wallet . It's a match made in-well don't want to use that word for the hobby. Everything else is just smoke.

Money isn't the issue this thread is about.

[FLReWrite]

Originally Posted by papadee

Money isn't the issue this thread is about.

I agree with this but I believe Burk's comments were made in the context that volume is inextricably tied to money.

[Old-T]

The women I know who make the most money in this business actually see the fewest clients. Ladies who make $25K a night and probably average one date a month. Their clientele demands that they are completely UTR, and if not they are no longer in demand.

[Still Looking]

It means the same as:

SL'S Top Things That Are NOT True

1) I love you, You're not old you're distinguished
2) I thinck you're so big
3) I love it when you do that
4) I can't wait to see you again
5) I really enjoy spending time with you
6) I can't believe you see escorts you're so handsome
7) I almost came twice
8) I love it when you ram your finger up my twat or in my ass
9) I thinck maybe next time we'll try that
10)I want you to really fuck me hard

No such thing as low volume until escorts can't lie!

[burkalini]

Originally Posted by papadee

Money isn't the issue this thread is about.

The thread is about what is what is the limit to being
low volume and my reply is it's a marketing ploy to get more money being that getting more money is what I'm a low volume provider is about. In other words THE WALLET. Kronk can read.

[burkalini]

Originally Posted by Still Looking

It means the same as:

SL'S Top Things That Are NOT True

1) I love you, You're not old you're distinguished
2) I thinck you're so big
3) I love it when you do that
4) I can't wait to see you again
5) I really enjoy spending time with you
6) I can't believe you see escorts you're so handsome
7) I almost came twice
8) I love it when you ram your finger up my twat or in my ass
9) I thinck maybe next time we'll try that
10)I want you to really fuck me hard

No such thing as low volume until escorts can't lie!

Nice to see you're back Still

[Still Looking]

Originally Posted by burkalini

Nice to see you're back Still

Thacnks Burk.

[papadee]

Originally Posted by burkalini

The thread is about what is what is the limit to being
low volume and my reply is it's a marketing ploy to get more money being that getting more money is what I'm a low volume provider is about. In other words THE WALLET. Kronk can read.

I don't know if it's auto-correct, typing on a phone, or what, but I can barely comprehend what you wrote.

The hobby itself is about the wallet, so what you're saying isn't some revelation. A lot of terms (GFE, PSE, low-volume) are marketing ploys, but the ones who practice what they market are usually satisfied with their hobby experiences.

And I'm not sure I agree with your answer that being low-volume = more money..

[garhkal]

Originally Posted by Old-T

The women I know who make the most money in this business actually see the fewest clients. Ladies who make $25K a night and probably average one date a month. Their clientele demands that they are completely UTR, and if not they are no longer in demand.

That's cause those women probably charge the most..

[burkalini]

Originally Posted by papadee

I don't know if it's auto-correct, typing on a phone, or what, but I can barely comprehend what you wrote.

The hobby itself is about the wallet, so what you're saying isn't some revelation. A lot of terms (GFE, PSE, low-volume) are marketing ploys, but the ones who practice what they market are usually satisfied with their hobby experiences.

And I'm not sure I agree with your answer that being low-volume = more money..

It's an attraction statement. I would guess that the vast majority ladies that advertise low volume either are not or they just haven't got that many calls . There are a few that are working and don't have time for more sessions but that's not being selective or low volume on purpose. Again it mostly a marketing plow. I respect your disagreement but I guess your not being able to comprehend my statement is your way of trying to insult me or you need to comprehend a little better. Either way it's still about the wallet.

[papadee]

Originally Posted by burkalini

The thread is about what is what is the limit to being
low volume and my reply is it's a marketing ploy to get more money being that getting more money is what I'm a low volume provider is about. In other words THE WALLET. Kronk can read.

Originally Posted by burkalini

It's an attraction statement. I would guess that the vast majority ladies that advertise low volume either are not or they just haven't got that many calls . There are a few that are working and don't have time for more sessions but that's not being selective or low volume on purpose. Again it mostly a marketing plow. I respect your disagreement but I guess your not being able to comprehend my statement is your way of trying to insult me or you need to comprehend a little better. Either way it's still about the wallet.

No insult intended. The double "what is" and the long run on sentence made it hare to read. Your post aren't usually like that, so I wondered if it was a technical issue.

[burkalini]

Originally Posted by papadee

No insult intended. The double "what is" and the long run on sentence made it hare to read. Your post aren't usually like that, so I wondered if it was a technical issue.

You are correct and I take back the insult statement. I did double type it. It wasn't a technical error it was a dumb error. While we disagree on the content I will take the hit for that one.