Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
WFS is the only banned snitch here. Nobody except the Austin Reacharound Crew trusts his reading comprehension or ability to reach logical conclusions.
That's what he does.
He's a racist so he wants everyone else to be.
He's a snitch, so he wants everyone else to be.
The list is almost endless. The projection of his shortfalls.
The "original memo" is on the computer on which he wrote it!!!!!
So, now WTF believes the FBI computer is with Mueller?
So a person who lacks the classification to be in the possession of classified material was carrying around Government property containing classified information and then turns it over to a person who lacks the classification to be in possession of the classified material?
ladies & gentleman...
this is how they make a sausage into a ham sandwich that they can indict & convict.
June 8, 2017
Obama’s State Department covered up Iranian cyber-attack during nuke deal negotiations
By Thomas Lifson
Our media devote most of their attention to a phony story of Trump collusion with a rival, while actual collusion (by silence) between the Obama administration and an actual enemy, Iran, is largely ignored.
The entire media establishment is having paroxysms over a leak by a 25-year-old NSA contractor of an NSA report that the Russians carried out spear-phishing attacks just prior to the election. But evidence of an Iranian attack during negotiations of the secret side deals in the wake of congressional failure to stop the deal has been ignored. The Washington Free Beacon reports:
State Department officials determined that Iran hacked their emails and social media accounts during a particularly sensitive week for the nuclear deal in the fall of 2015, according to multiple sources familiar with the details of the cyber attack.
The attack took place within days of the deal overcoming opposition in Congress in late September that year. That same week, Iranian officials and negotiators for the United States and other world powers were beginning the process of hashing out a series of agreements allowing Tehran to meet previously determined implementation deadlines. ...
It is unclear whether top officials at the State Department negotiating the Iran deal knew about the hack or if their personal or professional email accounts were compromised. Sources familiar with the attack believed top officials at State were deeply concerned about the hack and that those senior leaders did not have any of their email or social media accounts compromised in this particular incident.
While the Free Beacon report relies mostly on anonymous sources, there is actual hard evidence provided that this happened:
State Department officials in the Office of Iranian Affairs on Sept. 24, 2015 sent an email to dozens of outside contractors. The email alerted the contractors that a cyber-attack had occurred and urged them not to open any email from a group of five State Department officials that did not come directly from their official state.gov accounts.
If the State Department or White House had acknowledged the attack to the public, it would have demonstrated the wrongheadedness of the Iran deal Congress had just punted on.
Where is the outrage of the left, obsessed with "collaboration" with Russia (a nation that, unlike Iran, has not launched terror attacks against the United States the way Iran has)? What about Obama's and Jarrett's collaboration with Iran?
After all, hacking during negotiations is a way to gain an unfair advantage, causing the opponent to give away far too much. Isn't that exactly what happened? And didn't the Obama administration cover it up?
Sooner or later, the time will come for a full frontal pushback against the phony fantasy story of Trump-Russia collaboration. How about congressional investigations of the Iran deal and Obama administration collusion?
All sentient beings already know the answer is : "yes".
Quote:
Dims: We need to investigate whether Lynch gave cover to hildebeest campaign
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said Sunday that Congress should investigate whether former Attorney General Loretta Lynch pressured former FBI Director James Comey to cover for dim-retard nominee hildebeest's presidential campaign.
If he prepared his "memos" on "his" Government laptop all the files on there can and will be recovered (if they haven't already).
If he prepared...Big 'if' there LexyLiar.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rey Lengua
wtf is wrong with YOU ? NO WHERE in the story does it say that Comey gave copies of the memo to the Special Prosecutor. !
He said , under oath, he gave the original memo to Muller.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
Allegedly...
Well, I haven't talked to Muller and actually seen the memo. One would think Comey would not lie about such a thing while under oath. But evidently that is not enough for you. Were you like LexyLiar and Gay Rey a birther? Fucking loons who will not believe anything unless they see in person, even though they wouldn't know what the fuck they were looking at if it hit them on their bullshit filled eyes. .
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
So who is the "Special Prsecutor"!
And who said the "original memo" is with Mueller?
The "original memo " is on the computer on which he wrote it!!!!!
?
Sit down boy, this is not Snitchville where you can make shit up about a hooker to further your cause. You lied for years on here about hookers not being able to voice record Vice. They can. ShysterJohn schooled you recently on that fact. You think jury selection does not matter. Just sit the fuc down and STFU.
Comey told the committee he kept contemporaneous notes immediately following nine private conversations with Mr. Trump. He said he turned those memos over to former FBI Director Robert Mueller, the special counsel appointed to oversee the Russia investigation.
All sentient beings already know the answer is : "yes"..
Of course they do.
It is exactly why Comey has credibility in this whole matter. Out of all of them.
Both Clinton (Bill) and Trump have put him in bad spots. Well Bill put Lynch in a bad spot.
And if any of you believe that Trump was not trying to influence the Flynn investigation because Trump said 'Hope'....well then you probably believe that Bill Clinton was not trying to influence AG Lynch.
He said , under oath, he gave the original memo to Muller.
Well, I haven't talked to Muller and actually seen the memo. One would think Comey would not lie about such a thing while under oath.
Sit down boy, this is not Snitchville where you can make shit up about a hooker to further your cause.
Comey told the committee he kept contemporaneous notes immediately following nine private conversations with Mr. Trump. He said he turned those memos over to former FBI Director Robert Mueller, the special counsel appointed to oversee the Russia investigation.
what are you talking about. the "original memo"?
there is no "original" memo except that created digitally if the memories were typed into a laptop
you can print out the memo as many times as you wish
so then did he turn over the laptop? that's the "original" memo
how could he have the lap top, that's government property plus supposedly it had been deleted, destruction of government property, huh?
or did he download the file onto a thumb drive and steal it that way?
so did he lie when he said he turned over those memos? the whole truth please
You do realize that he no longer worked for the FBI and that Trump was trashing him. Which frees him up from some legal problems you seem to think this will cause him.
he wanted a special prosecutor to get trump on anything but also claimed he didn't know if by trump saying "i hope" he obstructed the application of justice but it was good fodder to get the political appointment of a special prosecutor
comey also lied when he said he had the memo released in response to a trump tweet, when the ny times quoted the memo the day before the tweet
he tried to smear trump by vague statements about being "troubled" and concerned in meeting trump
his testimony last week had one central theme - try to set up trump for a fall
I think he thinks he set what he views as traps for trump. since theres no crime maybe he, trump, can be had by some extraneous overstated attempt at defense
he effusively praised Mueller, perhaps in an attempt to schmooze his ego, his old buddy
I'm with gingrich when he claims Mueller wont be fair
comey even called trump a liar and what everyone misses is that the only instance comey cites as a lie was a matter of opinion, that the fbi was poorly led. how can one lie about an opinion?
comey is a snake who tried to appear as the last boy scout
