If Trump and his cohorts are so innocent why is Mike Flynn requesting immunity for testimony!

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by StandinStraight

My advise would be...

Take it under advisement - you need a grammar coach!

[goodman0422]

Flynn wants immunity for himself numb nuts. It doesn't mean anyone else did anything.

He probably wants it to protect himself from a perjury charge. If libs are so certain Trump and/or his campaign was dirty, they should give it to him so they can catch the bigger fish.

If they don't, it only means anti-Trump forces knew there was nothing there all along.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by goodman0422

...it only means anti-Trump forces knew there was nothing there all along.

The "anti-Trump forces" wouldn't, because it requires "critical analysis" and as was recently brought up most reliable psychologists will suggest that decision making should not be conducted during periods of severe emotional problems.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by DSK

I figured he was just needling Hillary.

Why do you people care about Russia anyway? Obama said it was just a regional power.

Putin is friend of United State. He not interfere with US election. He fight Muslim. He hate liberals. He hates [prohibited words]

he also has a large muslim population within southern Russia.

[dilbert firestorm]

trump recommended that Flynn get immunity as theres a witch hunt against him.

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Ask Martha Stewart.

Or Slick Willy !

[bamscram]

[JD Barleycorn]

If Flynn was on the up and up about trying to protect himself from legitimate scrutiny then this request for immunity would have been on the down low. Flynn is trolling the democrats and they're biting.

[Jackie S]

This is a no brainer. Everybody knows that the old trick is to get someone under oath, and then bombard them with every conceivable qustion one can amagine untill you finally get the infamous "gotcha".

Flynn is a Lieutenant General. He knows how these games are played.

He knows the Democrats are using the old tactic of "a charge in search of a crime".

Fuck em.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

This is a no brainer. Everybody knows that the old trick is to get someone under oath, and then bombard them with every conceivable qustion one can amagine untill you finally get the infamous "gotcha".

Flynn is a Lieutenant General. He knows how these games are played.

He knows the Democrats are using the old tactic of "a charge in search of a crime".

Fuck em.

That sounds a lot like Benghazi...


Never heard any on the right crying about that witch hunt.

Speaking of...what ever happened to "Lock her up..."

Oh wait that was politics. ..kinda like this is!



.

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by WTF

That sounds a lot like Benghazi...


Never heard any on the right crying about that witch hunt.

Speaking of...what ever happened to "Lock her up..."

Oh wait that was politics. ..kinda like this is!



.

I agree with one thing. Any investigation of Hillary could be described as a "Witch Hunt".

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

I agree with one thing. Any investigation of Hillary could be described as a "Witch Hunt".

lol, true dat!

But this is just politics, just like Benghazi was. Just depends on what side of the aisle you sit on whether it is honorable.


.

[wordup666]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Take it under advisement - you need a grammar coach!

True that!!!

[Mr MojoRisin]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Ask Martha Stewart.

Martha Stewart was essentially charged with Obstruction of Justice. Its not so much that she lied but she withheld pertinent information with the intent of impeding an investigation. If Flynn is doing something similar then he should be prosecuted. I don't think his plea for immunity should be honored if there is compelling evidence he committed a crime.



Jim

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Martha Stewart was essentially charged with Obstruction of Justice. Its not so much that she lied but she withheld pertinent information with the intent of impeding an investigation. If Flynn is doing something similar then he should be prosecuted. I don't think his plea for immunity should be honored if there is compelling evidence he committed a crime.

??? You're putting the cart before the horse.

How could Flynn have misled or impeded the FBI when he hasn't even been interviewed by them yet?