Quote:
Originally Posted by TinMan
I wish there was as much effort put into remixing/remastering some of the other great acts of that era as has been put into the Beatles. Has there been a major effort put into revisiting the Stones catalog? I bought the 50th anniversary edition of Let It Bleed. It was ok, but not revelatory.
|
Timely question. The Stones catalouge on CD was horrible for many years. Allen Klein owned the masters pre-sticky fingers, and he refused to deal. He also owned the masters for Chubby Checker, the Animals, Herman's Hermits, and a few others. All had shoddy CD catalouges until 2002, when they all got reissue campaigns with the Masters. Klein finally made a deal. Checker and the Hermits benefited greatly, the Animals and Stones were much improved.
But modern mastering still plauged the Stones cd's, too much digital compression. Improved, but still not so good.
The answer for me came recently, when I found a Mobile Fidelity Hot Rocks CD. They had apparently used masters (some alternate stereo) for a brief time in 1984, not unlike the Abbey Road brief rollout. To my ears, the sound is much better, very smooth, crankable. The post-sticky fingers CD's have been mastered 4-5 times, the first run was mediocre, the remasters around 1994 were a lot better. The next run, and since is a digital sonic mess. It's strange how the Engineers undo and make worse, sonics that were perfectly good.
By the way, Dynamic Range values averaged around 13-15, 35 years ago. Today they average around FOUR. Anything under about 10 makes my ears bleed (figuratively).