The new economy and the $80 escort (or "business is not slow")

[Guest021812-3]

Originally Posted by slims099

Thib, you're PM box is about to get flooded with "What 19 and 25 year old girls are HOT and only want 80$ for their time?"

I'll save everyone the time it takes to PM and just ask. Where are these hot young things charging $80-$100? Do they provide gfe or is it "slap a cover on and hurry the fuck up"? Inquiring minds want to know.

[LazurusLong]

[Naomi4u]

Originally Posted by LazurusLong

I hate to be so crass, but pussy gets old just as fast as a pair of shoes and when a new "fresh" pretty little thing comes along that prices her pussy at 80-100, why the hell would many guys want to spend 250-300 on pussy that has seen better days?

Wow. At $300 an hour. I do very very well. At least there are still men that appreciate the finer things in life. Now.... if pussy gets old, Why the fuck are you still here? You're totally contradicting yourself by being here.

[Naomi4u]

Originally Posted by hotlips_houlihan

Yes, I would rather see 1 a week at 300, then 3 a week a 100. It's more work for the same amount of money. I prefer quality over quantity. These girls don't understand that their pussy will be worn out before the age of 30, probably wearing a depends at 35, and having their asses wiped at 45 because they let everybody and anybody run up in it for cheap. Nobody has to strap a 2x4 to their ass when they visit me. I'm proud to say I'm still tight. Yea, I said it. And?

Meg

I do not understand. Is that by choice? Or is business slow in that area? I did one two hour and a 4 hour this week at $300. I certainly don't see a lot of guys but I would rather work at BILO for $300 a week than to have sex for it if that was all I needed. Do you get what I am trying to say? No offense at all.

I've never charged $100 but I'm pretty sure one should be busy at those rates. The ladies I know that charge $100 an hour are seeing 5 guys or more a day at that business model - It's a bit odd.

[Naomi4u]

Originally Posted by Sami

OH Bullshit!!! The economy isn't that bad to be a 80 to a 100 girl. Many of us have our rates as they are and wont be changing anything no time soon for you whiners, hagglers, and time wasters around here.

I have had the honor to meet a few of the good guy's around here. You whiners, hagglers, and time wasters call them white knights. They know how to treat a lady something a lot of you should take note. They actually even get good lovins from there wives to, they like to take idea's home to spice things up as well.


As far as that review you are referring to it is Bullshit to http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=277016. Mods really should remove it!
That girl is very clearly therapeutic nothing in her ad refers to anything more!!! Funny how a guy can write a review tarnish a girls reputation by putting bullshit review because she didn't do what he wanted her to do!BOO HOO!! His whole 11 post and 3 reviews are worthless, degrading, and ain't worth 2 cents rubbed together
But what do you care Mr Highhorse I get 80 girls! Those girls will be wore out then you will bash the shit out of them too.. Right!! If you can't afford a lady's rates then move on. Simple as that! Funny thing is all these BS Post makes it easier for us DNS list is growing by the minute.

Well said.

[lisa.lisa0302]

Where are these $80 dollars so happy with their job. The $80 gals are competing with other $80 gals, hell they even go lower to keep up with one another. Business might just be slow for them as well, because 50 other $80 gals are pricing themselves the same.

Different strokes for different folks. Some want quickies some want the whole experience.

What kind of session are you having for $80 bucks, by these hot chicks?, Or are you really getting a quickie.

To each their own.

As Lana said work smart, not harder.

[safire_sweet]

Originally Posted by Dannie

Business isn't slow! Why does everyone keep saying times are hard and business is crap and we should all lower our rates to keep up with the new, cheap, hot talent?!? Where is this information coming from?? Business is booming over here!

I agree
Safire Sweet

[trynagetlaid]

What's all this talk about pussy getting old, worn out, 2 x 4's, blah blah blah???

Like my Uncle Lee told me many moons ago "if you could make a pair of shoes out of one you could wear them a lifetime."

The biggest danger is not using it enough to where it's hard to make the juices flow.

Let the market dictate the price, not worrying about wearing a pussy out like a machine part. If the young honeys want to sell it cheap why shouldn't they?

[Ranchhand]

Hell, I learn something new all the time on here. I didnt even know you could wear one out.

[hotlips_houlihan]

Originally Posted by Naomi4u

I do not understand. Is that by choice? Or is business slow in that area? I did one two hour and a 4 hour this week at $300. I certainly don't see a lot of guys but I would rather work at BILO for $300 a week than to have sex for it if that was all I needed. Do you get what I am trying to say? No offense at all.

I've never charged $100 but I'm pretty sure one should be busy at those rates. The ladies I know that charge $100 an hour are seeing 5 guys or more a day at that business model - It's a bit odd.

No offense taken cua I have no idea what you are asking me lol

[Brass Balls]

I think it is a classic case of supply and demand economics. What is something worth? Whatever someone will pay. You see new cars from $20K to over $100K because people will pay. If no one paid $100K for a car there wouldn't be any on the market. In this case if there are people willing to pay $300 then the free market system is working. For me, I have X income minus Y obligations plus Z occasionally watching over me so a $300 session probably just isn't going to happen.

Over the years I've had a few high end encounters ($$$) and to be honest most weren't that great. But, same for the low end encounters ($), quite a few left me wanting for more. But certainly not all.

So we just have to let the system work. The ladies can charge what they want and as long as guys pay it everyone wins. If they ask too much the system will let them know. Too little and time to hire a scheduler and install a revolving door. For me I have a range I can be within and that's my economics.

[Guest032516]

Really? Hot 19yo to 25yo girls with firm bodies that love the sex, but they only charge $80 to $100?

And they hide that fact from all the rest of us, but they let you in on the good deal because you're ... what? Special?

I've seen this recycled line of bullshit on this and other boards too many times to count.

It gets re-posted from time to time by the more desperate and/or unscrupulous hobbyists to (I guess) panic some of the more gullible providers into thinking they have to slash prices to get more business.

If providers really fell for this scam, it would be great for hobbyists. But the providers would just end up making less money while seeing only slightly more clients.

Some percentage of the male population is not interested in hobbying at all, primarily because they are already getting it for free from wives and girlfriends. They won't be swayed by price, because they just aren't interested, period.

Among the percentage of men that are hobbyists, the major limiting factor for all sessions is not price, but the ability of hobbyists to get away from work and/or the family to see a provider. And in this economy, hobbyists are working harder than ever to avoid getting laid off, to supplement their reduced salaries, etc. In other words, employed hobbyists have even less time to play around than before.

If providers cut their prices in half, that does not mean that hobbyists would suddenly have twice as much free time to sneak out and see the providers, does it?

And unemployed hobbyists don't have any money to spend on the hobby, period.

Hobby money is discretionary spending money, just like spending on basketball tickets, movies, beer. And when times are hard, discretionary spending is the first thing that gets trimmed, both for the employed, the under-employed and the unemployed.

So, in your fantasy scenario, a hot-but-gullible provider cuts her rate from $300 to $100. The likely result is that each regular hobbyist that sees her once a month (i.e., $300/month) may now see her maybe 3 times in a 2 month period (i.e., $150/month) and she gets maybe one new, once-a-month bargain hunter for each regular (i.e., another $100/month). That means she is now doing 2 and a half sessions per month for $250 in place of one session for $300. That's great for the hobbyist. How does that help the provider?

I don't doubt for a second there are $80 hookers out there. But they aren't hot by any reasonable definition of that term. For $80, you get a horrid-looking meth addict that will rob you if you turn your back.

Show me the $80 escort that looks like she could be on the cover of Maxim, then we can talk.

Hell, just show me the Hooters or Twin Peaks waitress that will fuck you for $80, then we can talk.

If the ladies cut their rates to $100 per session, they will find themselves working harder for less total money. And when they complain about it, I guarantee another hobbyist will jump in and say "Well, if you just cut your rate to $40 an hour...."

[Sami]

Very well said

Originally Posted by ExNYer

Really? Hot 19yo to 25yo girls with firm bodies that love the sex, but they only charge $80 to $100?

And they hide that fact from all the rest of us, but they let you in on the good deal because you're ... what? Special?

I've seen this recycled line of bullshit on this and other boards too many times to count.

It gets re-posted from time to time by the more desperate and/or unscrupulous hobbyists to (I guess) panic some of the more gullible providers into thinking they have to slash prices to get more business.

If providers really fell for this scam, it would be great for hobbyists. But the providers would just end up making less money while seeing only slightly more clients.

Some percentage of the male population is not interested in hobbying at all, primarily because they are already getting it for free from wives and girlfriends. They won't be swayed by price, because they just aren't interested, period.

Among the percentage of men that are hobbyists, the major limiting factor for all sessions is not price, but the ability of hobbyists to get away from work and/or the family to see a provider. And in this economy, hobbyists are working harder than ever to avoid getting laid off, to supplement their reduced salaries, etc. In other words, employed hobbyists have even less time to play around than before.

If providers cut their prices in half, that does not mean that hobbyists would suddenly have twice as much free time to sneak out and see the providers, does it?

And unemployed hobbyists don't have any money to spend on the hobby, period.

Hobby money is discretionary spending money, just like spending on basketball tickets, movies, beer. And when times are hard, discretionary spending is the first thing that gets trimmed, both for the employed, the under-employed and the unemployed.

So, in your fantasy scenario, a hot-but-gullible provider cuts her rate from $300 to $100. The likely result is that each regular hobbyist that sees her once a month (i.e., $300/month) may now see her maybe 3 times in a 2 month period (i.e., $150/month) and she gets maybe one new, once-a-month bargain hunter for each regular (i.e., another $100/month). That means she is now doing 2 and a half sessions per month for $250 in place of one session for $300. That's great for the hobbyist. How does that help the provider?

I don't doubt for a second there are $80 hookers out there. But they aren't hot by any reasonable definition of that term. For $80, you get a horrid-looking meth addict that will rob you if you turn your back.

Show me the $80 escort that looks like she could be on the cover of Maxim, then we can talk.

Hell, just show me the Hooters or Twin Peaks waitress that will fuck you for $80, then we can talk.

If the ladies cut their rates to $100 per session, they will find themselves working harder for less total money. And when they complain about it, I guarantee another hobbyist will jump in and say "Well, if you just cut your rate to $40 an hour...."

[Naomi4u]

Originally Posted by ExNYer

Really? Hot 19yo to 25yo girls with firm bodies that love the sex, but they only charge $80 to $100?

And they hide that fact from all the rest of us, but they let you in on the good deal because you're ... what? Special?

I've seen this recycled line of bullshit on this and other boards too many times to count.

It gets re-posted from time to time by the more desperate and/or unscrupulous hobbyists to (I guess) panic some of the more gullible providers into thinking they have to slash prices to get more business.

If providers really fell for this scam, it would be great for hobbyists. But the providers would just end up making less money while seeing only slightly more clients.

Some percentage of the male population is not interested in hobbying at all, primarily because they are already getting it for free from wives and girlfriends. They won't be swayed by price, because they just aren't interested, period.

Among the percentage of men that are hobbyists, the major limiting factor for all sessions is not price, but the ability of hobbyists to get away from work and/or the family to see a provider. And in this economy, hobbyists are working harder than ever to avoid getting laid off, to supplement their reduced salaries, etc. In other words, employed hobbyists have even less time to play around than before.

If providers cut their prices in half, that does not mean that hobbyists would suddenly have twice as much free time to sneak out and see the providers, does it?

And unemployed hobbyists don't have any money to spend on the hobby, period.

Hobby money is discretionary spending money, just like spending on basketball tickets, movies, beer. And when times are hard, discretionary spending is the first thing that gets trimmed, both for the employed, the under-employed and the unemployed.

So, in your fantasy scenario, a hot-but-gullible provider cuts her rate from $300 to $100. The likely result is that each regular hobbyist that sees her once a month (i.e., $300/month) may now see her maybe 3 times in a 2 month period (i.e., $150/month) and she gets maybe one new, once-a-month bargain hunter for each regular (i.e., another $100/month). That means she is now doing 2 and a half sessions per month for $250 in place of one session for $300. That's great for the hobbyist. How does that help the provider?

I don't doubt for a second there are $80 hookers out there. But they aren't hot by any reasonable definition of that term. For $80, you get a horrid-looking meth addict that will rob you if you turn your back.

Show me the $80 escort that looks like she could be on the cover of Maxim, then we can talk.

Hell, just show me the Hooters or Twin Peaks waitress that will fuck you for $80, then we can talk.

If the ladies cut their rates to $100 per session, they will find themselves working harder for less total money. And when they complain about it, I guarantee another hobbyist will jump in and say "Well, if you just cut your rate to $40 an hour...."

Well said. I like you.

We have a thread winner.

[~Ze~]

Originally Posted by Brass Balls

obligations plus Z occasionally watching over me

Not this Z.... btw.