The Challenge is made: Gun Control

[VitaMan]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

You can keep your legs crossed or use Birth Control.

Neither does this

[VitaMan]

Do we just need to go back to the wild west of the 1800s ? Everybody with a holster and a firearm at their side.

"I wouldn't leave a man without a horse and a gun."

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

Do we just need to go back to the wild west of the 1800s ? Everybody with a holster and a firearm at their side.

"I wouldn't leave a man without a horse and a gun."

Actually the "Wild West" wasn't that wild People had more respect for each other. Shoot outs in the streets were far and in between. You obviously watch too much Television.

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Yeah listen to David Pakman, lol.

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

This doesn't answer anything

Of course not it doesn't align with your views, besides you don't want the problem solved anyway.

[VitaMan]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

Actually the "Wild West" wasn't that wild People had more respect for each other. Shoot outs in the streets were far and in between. You obviously watch too much Television.

So you were there

[VitaMan]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

Of course not it doesn't align with your views, besides you don't want the problem solved anyway.

That would be incorrect....and your statement is completely out of line.

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

Actually the "Wild West" wasn't that wild People had more respect for each other. Shoot outs in the streets were far and in between. You obviously watch too much Television.

Originally Posted by Levianon17

Of course not it doesn't align with your views, besides you don't want the problem solved anyway.

You're such a fuckin' simpleton. Have you never heard it's "few and far between" you God dammed simple wannabe-Christian know-nothing? Fuck!

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

So you were there

No, but there are many Documentaries on the subject. Go look one up instead of posting speculative bullshit about Trump all the time.

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

You're such a fuckin' simpleton. Have you never heard it's "few and far between" you God dammed simple wannabe-Christian know-nothing? Fuck!

Hahahaha.....who gives a shit how I worded it you little Marxist twink.

[VitaMan]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

No, but there are many Documentaries on the subject. Go look one up instead of posting speculative bullshit about Trump all the time.

hahahaha

You have really messed up with your posts in this thread

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

hahahaha

You have really messed up with your posts in this thread

Right you are. This Qbert is so frustrated that he doesn’t know what he’s against anymore. But he’s against it.

I’d like to see a review from him. Seems he’s against sex with women in the Vagina too.(that’s a PGH thing)

[1blackman1]

I love all the contributions from those on the right. So many suggestions. The ones Barley put forth are the best. Wacko has the second best. BB came up with some great suggestions too. Those dudes are really smart. Can’t wait for the rest of their great ideas. Sadly I think Levi might be senile. His decline over the past year has been been very obvious.

[ICU 812]

The best way to "control" guns is to repeal the Second Amendment.

That would be the single most effective method for banning guns. Without the Second Amendment, any law banning this or that specific firearm, or a whole class of guns would be unassailable in court.

This is why gun bans and confiscations can be made to work in New Zealand, Australia and Caneda; They have no Second Amendment or any of the other protections and rights we enjoy through The Bill of Rights.

The Constitution provides two mechanisms for adopting amendments.

[sand247]

I think the problem with the entire debate is the "What If" and "It could change things" outlook. At the bottom of this there's two sides, the ones that want gun control as a means to disarm the population, and the ones that want to prevent the mass killings. The later doesn't even realize the former exists. It's been said, but it's worth noting again, the laws on the books aren't enforced. The federal and state governments are usually too busy at a local level trying to keep society from destroying itself to worry about the outliers. What's never discussed is the fact that the community at large, in most of these cases, knew the person had mental issues, and chose the "it's not my problem" route. I'd be all for community lead gun overwatch committes, they don't have disarm power but they do have a mechanism for presenting a case to local law about an issue they see. To purchase a firearm you'd have to be a member of that community for X years to avoid the transitory buyers.