Russian Bombers Enter US Airspace Twice

[Whirlaway]

Putin has no fears from an Obama threat; Putin knows Obama is his lapdog.....

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Putin has no fears from an Obama threat; Putin knows Obama is his lapdog.....

Yep, OBL thought Obama was going to be a "lapdog," just like GW. We all know how the Obama/OBL "lapdog" relationship ended! Don't we?

[nwarounder]

Originally Posted by bigtex

Yep, OBL thought Obama was going to be a "lapdog," just like GW. We all know how the Obama/OBL "lapdog" relationship ended! Don't we?

OBL is all you got? Seriously? He didn't even have a fricking plane. Putin is ramming it up Obama's ass, and he is taking it like a good little beotch. Didn't expect anything else.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by nwarounder

OBL is all you got? Seriously?

As a matter of fact, OBL sleeping with the fishes IS a mighty big deal. Too bad GW couldn't make it happen!

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by nwarounder

OBL is all you got? Seriously? He didn't even have a fricking plane. Putin is ramming it up Obama's ass, and he is taking it like a good little beotch. Didn't expect anything else.

he sure didnt ... he used OURS ..... talk about raming it up some ass

and on Bush's watch at that

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

We won't engage in Syria; Comrade Putin has already told Comrade Obama to stay out, and he will obey.

You're probably right. Not helping the rebels in Syria, would be consistant with Obama not helping the failed attempt to overthrow Ahmadinejad in Iran, in the so called Green Revolution.

Obama had largely favorable comments about the Arab Spring in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia and characterized it as the spread of freedom. He was not so pleased when the dictatorship in Iran was threatened a couple of years ago. He said it was none of our business and actually went so far as to say that the protestors in Iran had requested that we stay out the conflict; this was later proven to be a lie.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

You're probably right. Not helping the rebels in Syria, would be consistant with Obama not helping the failed attempt to overthrough Ahmadinejad in Iran, in the so called Green Revolution.

Obama had largely favorable comments about the Arab Spring in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia and characterized it as the spread of freedom. He was not so pleased when the dictatorship in Iran was threatened a couple of years ago. He said it was none of our business and actually went so far as to say that the protestors in Iran had requested that we stay out the conflict; this was later proven to be a lie.

cant you name a few dozen more countries?




sooner or later the NUKEM ALL CLUB will be too old to type

[nwarounder]

Originally Posted by CJ7

he sure didnt ... he used OURS ..... talk about raming it up some ass

and on Bush's watch at that

Exactly, and we targeted and killed him for it, he was weak. Putin is not, but it's still no reason for Obama to take it up the ass and say or do nothing, that makes us look weak, and therefore vulnerable to the same fate.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by nwarounder

Exactly, and we targeted and killed him for it, he was weak. Putin is not, but it's still no reason for Obama to take it up the ass and say or do nothing, that makes us look weak, and therefore vulnerable to the same fate.

horseshit


you act like crossing airspace is something new ... duurrrrrrrr


it doesnt make any president look weak

[nwarounder]

Originally Posted by CJ7

horseshit


you act like crossing airspace is something new ... duurrrrrrrr


it doesnt make any president look weak

If I were Putin, I would think it means he is weak and I can continue to do it without fear of reprise. Not sure why you wouldn't think that if you were Putin, but ohh well.

[satexasguy]

the democrats aren't worried about this at all because they think we can afford to drastically cut military spending and divert the funds to social programs without compromising our ability to defend ourselves. Of course once the russians (or any other country) are knocking on the doors of the white house, the democrats will blame the Republicans.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by satexasguy

the democrats aren't worried about this at all because they think we can afford to drastically cut military spending and divert the funds to social programs without compromising our ability to defend ourselves. Of course once the russians (or any other country) are knocking on the doors of the white house, the democrats will blame the Republicans.

Bush 41 literally gutted the military after Reagans cold war ended, yet we're still alive. Can you believe that?

a ragged ass 60 year old russian plane left its airspace ...

EEEEEEEKKKKKKKKKKK.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by CJ7

Bush 41 literally gutted the military after Reagans cold war ended, yet we're still alive. Can you believe that?

a ragged ass 60 year old russian plane left its airspace ...

EEEEEEEKKKKKKKKKKK.

The Boeing B-52 Stratofortress is a long-range, subsonic, jet-powered strategic bomber. The B-52 was designed and built by Boeing, who have continued to provide support and upgrades. It has been operated by the United States Air Force (USAF) since 1954. Mathematically speaking, that's nearly "60 years".

[i'va biggen]

Sounds like the right wing is wanting us to go to war again.Stay out of Syria ....

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The Boeing B-52 Stratofortress is a long-range, subsonic, jet-powered strategic bomber. The B-52 was designed and built by Boeing, who have continued to provide support and upgrades. It has been operated by the United States Air Force (USAF) since 1954. Mathematically speaking, that's nearly "60 years".

yup

look up SR71 Blackbird or B-2 Spirit, and wecome the new century