IT Was A READYNESS TEST

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by bb1961

A communist taking "rights"...hypocrisy GOLD!!

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...081&highlight=

Bo-ring. (Taking?)

At least Levy is worth ridicule. You? Not so much. Until Hannity gives you some talking points.

[pfunkdenver]

Originally Posted by bb1961

I love to expose FRAUDS!!

Sooo...you're going to expose yourself?

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

Sooo...you're going to expose yourself?

I might, and I stress might, be a leftist hack. But that psycho is just a red-state caricature. Not even worth making fun of. Unless he comes up with his own ideas. It wouldn't take much to burn him. Levy, a simple Christian Conservative, is worth fucking with.


Nice to hear from you funkster.

[Tiny]

I'm lost. What's this thread about?

[dilbert firestorm]

It was about pimp and host!
LOL!

[dilbert firestorm]

BUMP!!!
BOOM!!!

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

It was about pimp and host!
LOL!

Ohh!!! Got it. Pimps suck. Hosting at your residence is a bad idea unless you know the provider pretty well. These are things we should agree on.

[bb1961]

Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

Sooo...you're going to expose yourself?

Why don't you show me an example...ANY.
I did of your communist buddy starting a thread about "rights"
don't you know people under communism have no rights??

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...081&highlight=

...nice try though!! He can't have it both ways...he fails like all communist and you go to his defense. BRAVO!!

[lolhahaha]

Originally Posted by Tiny

Ohh!!! Got it. Pimps suck. Hosting at your residence is a bad idea unless you know the provider pretty well. These are things we should agree on.

you must be in on this texas robbery scam.

[eccieuser9500]

It's an oil thing, right?

[eccieuser9500]

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by lolhahaha

you must be in on this texas robbery scam.

Shhhhh.... Dont say it so loud that the noobs & nubs hear it.

[eccieuser9500]

By hook or by crook.


Trump wants the courts to help him sabotage the January 6 investigation


https://www.vox.com/2021/12/19/22837...ilege-thompson

While Nixon involved a special prosecutor’s investigation — and the Nixon opinion speaks of the need to preserve “the primary constitutional duty of the Judicial Branch to do justice in criminal prosecutions” — Thompson involves a congressional investigation. So Trump could argue that Congress’s investigatory power is less expansive than the authority of a federal prosecutor and the courts that enforce that prosecutor’s subpoenas.

But this argument is undercut by GSA, which upheld a federal statute that required the federal government to take custody of Nixon’s presidential records after Nixon left office. Nixon held that a “generalized assertion of privilege must yield to the demonstrated, specified need for evidence in a pending criminal trial.”