New Poll shows that most Republicans regret nominating Trump.

[Sistine Chapel]

Originally Posted by DSK

Trump is a billionaire, and created a valuable name brand.

He has been successful in numerous ventures in business and television.

Additionally, he wants other countries to pay their fair share for our military guarantees.

He wanted the Gulf States to pay for their protection.

He wants to renegotiate (he is a successful author, too) bad trade deals which have decimated manufacturing jobs.

Trump is a coward who got 5 military deferments due to fake bone spurs in his ankle while he continued to play Lacrosse.

Based on the deferments alone he has no business commanding any military. The fucking coward

[bambino]

Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

Here is what I want to know as it seems all you fellas got to hang your tin foil hats on is Benghazi and the email server. If that's all you got then you've got no real basis for anything. Yes Benghazi was tragic but it happens just like the death of soldiers who died under Bush in a war he started based on a lie. However, one counter to the Benghazi argument is that she also helped get Bin-Laden so shall we call it a wash?

Helped get Bin Laden? How? Did she fart on him. Ultimately, Obama gave the order and the military carried out the order to perfection. And let's face it, giving the order was the easy thing to do. It wasn't like Truman ordering the A bomb. And The Lybian disaster was Clintons baby. It's now a terrorist strong hold, not to mention the lives lost. She failed to protect them. That's squarely on her.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by gfejunkie

How many dimretards want a do-over?
I'd like to see that poll.

Maybe you can get WhinyLittleBITCH to start one. He likes polls. (And POLES through HOLES!)

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Hillary is the most dishonest, corrupt, amoral, and incompetent person to ever run for high office. She will sell the power of her presidency to the highest bidder, just like when she was SOS.

Again, talking points from the Trumpite cartoon factory.

What's GOOD about Trump? What qualifies his to be commander in chief?

Is it his great diplomatic skills?

His success in the policy arena?

His ability to communicate?

Trump is not qualified because you are a misogynistic pig, WhinyLittleBitch.

No matter how badly HRC destroys Drumpf on Election Day, the stain of the Drumpf nomination will affect the GOP for a generation. Hopefully America will recover.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by bambino

What a fucking idiot. She used her marriage to parlay that into a political career. And she's been a complete failure, not to mention a lying, crook. She put lives in danger and ultimately lead to lives lost. Great resume Puke Wyat.

You are a blithering fool, Fatass. HRC is the most qualified candidate ever to run for POTUS. By far.

Apparently you don't know jack shit about marriage and partnership.

In fact, you don't know jack shit about jack shit.

Tubolard!

[bambino]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You are a blithering fool, Fatass. HRC is the most qualified candidate ever to run for POTUS. By far.

Apparently you don't know jack shit about marriage and partnership.

In fact, you don't know jack shit about jack shit.

Tubolard!

Your a fat ass, because you can't move. You physically unable. You're on too many meds. As far as Clinton, she's qualified to run a Mafiosi crime ring. You stupid cocksucking pig.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

Here is what I want to know as it seems all you fellas got to hang your tin foil hats on is Benghazi and the email server. If that's all you got then you've got no real basis for anything. Yes Benghazi was tragic but it happens just like the death of soldiers who died under Bush in a war he started based on a lie. However, one counter to the Benghazi argument is that she also helped get Bin-Laden so shall we call it a wash?

She couldn't properly protect one ambassador or classified material in her care, Sissy Chap, and those incidents are demonstrable proof your lyin' cunt doesn't have the intellectual skills to be president of the United States, Sissy Chap. BTW, Sissy Chap, your lyin' ass knows that Bush43's jutistifications for renewing hostilities against Saddam were the same as those voiced by Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator when he sent troops against Saddam in 1998.

Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

Trump is a coward who got 5 military deferments due to fake bone spurs in his ankle while he continued to play Lacrosse.

Based on the deferments alone he has no business commanding any military. The fucking coward

But your supercilious, lib-retard ass didn't have a problem voting for that draft-dodging liar in chief Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator, did ya, SiSSy Chap?

[DSK]

Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

Trump is a coward who got 5 military deferments due to fake bone spurs in his ankle while he continued to play Lacrosse.

Based on the deferments alone he has no business commanding any military. The fucking coward

I'm willing to say that military service is a prerequisite for the Presidency - is that what you want?

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by bambino

Your a fat ass, because you can't move. You physically unable. You're on too many meds. As far as Clinton, she's qualified to run a Mafiosi crime ring. You stupid cocksucking pig.

Just what meds are you referring to, Big Chunk?

And upon what evidence do you base your accusation?

Pretty fucking funny though, coming from a 400 pound pile of lard.

[DSK]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You are a blithering fool, Fatass. HRC is the most qualified candidate ever to run for POTUS. By far.

Apparently you don't know jack shit about marriage and partnership.

In fact, you don't know jack shit about jack shit.

Tubolard!

I disagree with your assertion about Hillary's qualifications.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

Here is what I want to know ...

... who cares what you "want to know"?

[theotherguy1]

I believe both parties are disappointed in their nominations.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by DSK

Yes, I think we fucked up, but Trump is better than Hillary, so there you have it.

We have your opinion. The facts show trump with a 70% rate for giving mostly false, false, or pants on fire statements. For Ms Clinton, her rate is 27%. This number includes her email statements and benghazi statements.
All politicians lie to sum degree. Im this case it happens to be 27% vs 70%.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Hell, Hillary didn't even win the nomination. She stole it.

Sounds like your opinion
How can using the long standing procedors that everone else could use? The fact you don't like her taints everything you say about her.
8

Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt

I
applaud your honesty but please tell me which manner is Trump better ? Trump is perhaps the most inexperienced person to ever run for office. What are his attributes? We all know CLintons resumes and it trumps Trumps no pun intended.

Better is an opinion. A fact everyone continuly talks about is the truth. And the facts the record (actually a collection of public statements) shows is that it's trump being untruful 70% of the time and Clinton 27%. Show me facts or proof those numbers are not correct.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Actually, I'm disappointed with myself for not supporting Trump earlier.

Since I can see this posted under your handle I believe you said it. I don't know why. The scope and topics of the lies he'made show his lack of understanding of the job he"wants".

Originally Posted by bambino

What a fucking idiot. She used her marriage to parlay that into a political career. And she's been a complete failure, not to mention a lying, crook. She put lives in danger and ultimately lead to lives lost. Great resume Puke Wyat.

Glad you're back douche-bag. Your absence was holding your Team trump twats back. To your credit you perspire (intended word) your fatties to new averages.
Just one question. Who is that fat fuck douche-bag on your back in your avatar? Just kidding. I don't give a shit.

Originally Posted by jma9

If you truly believe this then you are a fucking moron.

Believe this.
Trump 70% of his statements are mostly false, false, or pant on fire.
Clinton scores 27%.

http://www.politifact.com/personalit...llary-clinton/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

We have your opinion. The facts show trump with a 70% rate for giving mostly false, false, or pants on fire statements. For Ms Clinton, her rate is 27%. This number includes her email statements and benghazi statements.
All politicians lie to sum degree. Im this case it happens to be 27% vs 70%.


Sounds like your opinion
How can using the long standing procedors that everone else could use? The fact you don't like her taints everything you say about her.
8

Better is an opinion. A fact everyone continuly talks about is the truth. And the facts the record (actually a collection of public statements) shows is that it's trump being untruful 70% of the time and Clinton 27%. Show me facts or proof those numbers are not correct.


Since I can see this posted under your handle I believe you said it. I don't know why. The scope and topics of the lies he'made show his lack of understanding of the job he"wants".


Glad you're back douche-bag. Your absence was holding your Team trump twats back. To your credit you perspire (intended word) your fatties to new averages.
Just one question. Who is that fat fuck douche-bag on your back in your avatar? Just kidding. I don't give a shit.


Believe this.
Trump 70% of his statements are mostly false, false, or pant on fire.
Clinton scores 27%.

http://www.politifact.com/personalit...llary-clinton/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

Politifact is a lib-retard megaphone for hildebeest, masterdickmuncher. Your source is dishonestly biased, masterdickmuncher, and you're stupid if you imagine anyone here doesn't know how dishonestly biased Politifact is for hildebeest is, masterdickmuncher.

[The_Waco_Kid]

believe this munchbutt ....

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...able-1131.html

• Polls
• Election 2016
• Video
• Writers
• More

Polls



Quick Poll/Map Links
Advanced Search
Find Any Poll






Clinton: Favorable/Unfavorable




712 Shares

Trump: Favorable/Unfavorable | Latest 2016 Polls
Polling Data

PollDateSampleFavorable
Unfavorable
SpreadRCP Average8/18 - 8/30--41.254.0-12.8FOX News8/28 - 8/301011 RV4553-8ABC/Wash Post8/24 - 8/28RV3859-21Reuters/Ipsos8/25 - 8/291946 A4654-8USA Today/Suffolk8/24 - 8/291000 LV4251-9Economist/YouGov8/27 - 8/291300 A4158-17PPP (D)8/26 - 8/28881 LV4152-11Monmouth8/25 - 8/28689 LV3751-14Gallup8/19 - 8/25A4055-15Quinnipiac8/18 - 8/241498 LV4153-12All Clinton: Favorable/Unfavorable Polling Data


RCP Poll Average
Clinton: Favorable/Unfavorable

41.2
Favorable
54.0
Unfavorable

--
--
--
--



http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/...vorable-rating