In The Upcomming Census, Respondents Will Be Asked Citizenship Status......

[gfejunkie]

Originally Posted by texassapper

The list goes on and fucking on....

Let's see... What happened to 20% of the US uranium stores?

[nevergaveitathought]

the census asks your race as well

are you white or white Hispanic ......all sorts of dumb race questions

dividing one into little divisions of nonsense

but asking if you are a citizen ..yes its a good help in apportioning electors and the house of representatives ....that's a good thing

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

but asking if you are a citizen ..yes its a good help in apportioning electors and the house of representatives ....that's a good thing

That's why the Liberals are opposing the question ... they will argue the ILLEGALS ARE ENTITLED to "representation"! Did you hear the ILLEGAL ALIEN LAWYER arguing he voted at home AND here in the U.S.!!!!!

https://www.calbarxap.com/applicatio...ction_6068.pdf

Attorney’s Oath (California)

I solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of an attorney and counselor to the best of my knowledge and ability.

[gfejunkie]

How can a non-citizen vote?

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by gfejunkie

How can a non-citizen vote?

In California, if you get a drivers license you are automatically registered to vote. But you don't need to prove your citizenship to get a drivers license. so that's how they get on the rolls in the first place...then they show up to vote with a drivers license and a bill from their address and boom...non-citizen voter. That's why libs love the motor voter laws. They also don't want the rolls reviewed to strike them off (or in Chicago to remove the dead) Them Libs are all about winning...even if they have to cheat to do it. After that, they legalize everyone...thus ensuring they win again at the next election. Our Country is slowly being stolen from us assuredly as the sun rises in the East.

But, if we won't fight for it, we don't deserve to keep it.

[TheDaliLama]

Originally Posted by texassapper

In California, if you get a drivers license you are automatically registered to vote. But you don't need to prove your citizenship to get a drivers license. so that's how they get on the rolls in the first place...then they show up to vote with a drivers license and a bill from their address and boom...non-citizen voter. That's why libs love the motor voter laws. They also don't want the rolls reviewed to strike them off (or in Chicago to remove the dead) Them Libs are all about winning...even if they have to cheat to do it. After that, they legalize everyone...thus ensuring they win again at the next election. Our Country is slowly being stolen from us assuredly as the sun rises in the East.

But, if we won't fight for it, we don't deserve to keep it.

That’s foreign intervention in our elections.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by gfejunkie

How can a non-citizen vote?

Before you even get there ....

How the fuck does an illegal alien get a license to practice law?

[themystic]

Originally Posted by texassapper

Let's.

As opposed to Hillary Clinton? hah that's funny.

Why are ALMOST ALL products made in China these days, fcuktard?

Considering the state of the economy now compared to Obama I'll take the con job anyday, dumbass.

Dont take this personal Texas but youre a fucking moron. Nothing personal

[garhkal]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

The Commerce Department said that between 1820 and 1950 almost every decennial census asked a question on citizenship in.

that's very interesting! wonder why they didn't continue this after 1950.

AND from 1950 till 2010, it was still asked about on the LONGER forms, which maybe 1 in 7 people got, vice the short form which everyone got..

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

counting everyone including illegal and legal aliens has a valid statistical purpose.

BUT as long as the census is being used to apportion both federal funds AND SEATS in congress, i do NOT SEE ANY valid purpose in counting illegal aliens.

[QUOTE=dilbert firestorm;1060648778
as long as there is a court ruling that services must be provided to illegals, illegals have to be counted so that states and other business know what to budget for.[/QUOTE]

Then perhaps we need the Scotus, to rule once and for all, whether illegal invaders ARE or are not entitled to those services (both state and federal)..

Originally Posted by gfejunkie

How can a non-citizen vote?

LEGALLY, they can't. BUT too many liberals have all pushed to get them the right to vote, even if only locally (for school board elections) OR for state/federal ones (like ca does)..

[WTF]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

That's why the Liberals are opposing the question ... they will argue the ILLEGALS ARE ENTITLED to "representation"! Did you hear the ILLEGAL ALIEN LAWYER arguing he voted at home AND here in the U.S.!!!!!

https://www.calbarxap.com/applicatio...ction_6068.pdf

[SIZE="2"][B]

How about you provide the link to the lawyer saying what you said he said....instead of the infamous "Did you hear..." crap

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by texassapper

In California, if you get a drivers license you are automatically registered to vote. But you don't need to prove your citizenship to get a drivers license. so that's how they get on the rolls in the first place...then they show up to vote with a drivers license and a bill from their address and boom...non-citizen voter. That's why libs love the motor voter laws. They also don't want the rolls reviewed to strike them off (or in Chicago to remove the dead) Them Libs are all about winning...even if they have to cheat to do it. After that, they legalize everyone...thus ensuring they win again at the next election. Our Country is slowly being stolen from us assuredly as the sun rises in the East.

But, if we won't fight for it, we don't deserve to keep it.

The lib-retards are advocating for a new "3/5's Clause". They want illegals to count for purposes of congressional apportionment, but then the lib-retards will pick the candidate they want while the illegals have no voice. Dim-retards are trying to reinstate what they lost during the Civil War.

[the_real_Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by themystic

Lets take the census on workers at Trump hotels, golf courses and resorts

Like everything, TrumPutin is a phony motherfucker

Why are most TrumPutin products made in other countries

You worms who voted for him may realize one day that he conned you

Thy name is deflection.

[themystic]

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Thy name is deflection.

Hey Barley why don't you come to Texas, get rid of the Mexicans and see what that does to the economy

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by garhkal

AND from 1950 till 2010, it was still asked about on the LONGER forms, which maybe 1 in 7 people got, vice the short form which everyone got..

forgot that there were 2 forms, long & short. the article doesn't make clear which form was involved.

BUT as long as the census is being used to apportion both federal funds AND SEATS in congress, i do NOT SEE ANY valid purpose in counting illegal aliens.

this counting of illegals affects more on the state & local level than federal. states have to plan for their budget so have to include them in their calculations.

Then perhaps we need the Scotus, to rule once and for all, whether illegal invaders ARE or are not entitled to those services (both state and federal)..

the lower court & supreme court have made rulings in this area. states have always lost if they tried to use U.S. citizenship as a requirement.

some of the rulings are contradictory... states try to enforce federal law and they're told that they cannot enforce federal law, only feds can.

It would be up to Congress to fix this and it is telling that they have not done so.

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by themystic

Dont take this personal Texas but youre a fucking moron. Nothing personal

I don't take it personal... Your opinion isn't worth used toilet paper to anyone but yourself. And even that's debatable.