Biden agends is now done, and the old hoor is quitting.

[Devo]

You have the gall to complain about investigations when thats ALL that went on for Trump in the last six years, with another started today.

No, you may be tired of investigations, now that its your sides getting their assholes looked into.

I'm ready for Dems to be jailed for not appearing for a house subpeona as happened to multiple Trump people..

Oh no, they start on day one and for the next six years.

[HDGristle]

Dems aren't Eye's side. Or mine. Republicans aren't even yours unless you've been lying to us.

So which side are we on? We know where berry stands. He's on your right. I'm on your left. But not left, left.

Make sense?

[Devo]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Dems aren't Eye's side. Or mine. Republicans aren't even yours unless you've been lying to us.

So which side are we on? We know where berry stands. He's on your right. I'm on your left. But not left, left.

Make sense?

Not a R, that's the truth, but I am a conservative, and that equates to both the R and the L in some ways.

I don't consider being pro civil rights a strictly Dem position either both sides want to limit some rights.

Point being, we have a Conservative/Liberal government that almost all of tend to be on one side of.

Moderates/independents you just can't put in any group.

Still point is, what's good for the goose, is good for the gander, if you believe in two sexes, that is.

[AmishGangster]

Dems controlling the Senate could mean lots of judicial appointments if they can work together, which thankfully is doubtful. 2 more years of dysfunction is the best anyone not an entrenched liberal could possibly hope for right now. Had the lefties had control of Congress for the next 2 years we may have ended up in a financial mess that would negatively affect us for generations.

[1pittsburgh]

Originally Posted by Devo

Name calling, yes, against National figures, but not against any of you local folks.

Specifically aimed anger, you want to hate Trump, well give us our own whipping posts, MmmmKay.....

No one had insulted any board members in the thread that you made that comment.

[chizzy]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

No one had insulted any board members in the thread that you made that comment.

he was replying to hd about name calling, he didnt suggest anyone in this thread was name calling

reading is fundamental......

[Devo]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

No one had insulted any board members in the thread that you made that comment.

No shit, I started the thread didn't I?

Point being, I attacked the politicians, not the people here who likely voted for them.

Direct your anger at the elected official, not the people who put them there.

[Devo]

Originally Posted by chizzy

he was replying to hd about name calling, he didnt suggest anyone in this thread was name calling

reading is fundamental......

No shit brother, no shit.

[1pittsburgh]

Originally Posted by chizzy

he was replying to hd about name calling, he didnt suggest anyone in this thread was name calling

reading is fundamental......

When I said "in the thread that you made that comment" I was referring to this thread: https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...213&highlight= where he was crying about people calling him names, when no one was calling him names.

Reading IS fundamental. Smarten up.

[1pittsburgh]

Originally Posted by Devo

No shit, I started the thread didn't I?

Point being, I attacked the politicians, not the people here who likely voted for them.

Direct your anger at the elected official, not the people who put them there.

As far as I can tell it's against the rules to call members names, but it's not against the rules to call random voters or voting bases names. Otherwise, if it was, and was enforced evenly, many of your ilk would have been permanently banned long ago. One particular prolific sandbox poster would probably rack up enough points for a ban every week.