Quote:
Originally Posted by Hematoma
They'll only post a negative review if it "hints" at negativity. It can't be blatantly negative because, of course, that would be telling the truth!
"Slightly negative" reviews over there lambast the reviewer and place him on a spit over fire. For example, all it takes is a "she was a bit heavier than her pics suggested" comment and all hell breaks loose. Said reviewer is beaten with an estrogen-laced whip while he must say "nothing" and/or grovel at the feet of these girls who are simply laughable.
Yet I digress. The pics she sent me were disgusting in the sense of a "who the hell would pay for that?" category, which covers most girls on TOS anyways. The kicker is when you don't schedule with them, after viewing their unattractive pics, they fire back at you for being nothing more than a "pic collector". LMAO. I delete those pics faster than Joey Chestnut eats hot dogs.
|
Just so you know whatever you write about TOS gets back. Several members here ripped the fuck out of Eccie when it went down it April. They had some negative things so say about members and of coarse they removed the thread once Eccie was coming back.
So just a warning a few people act friendly to this site but are loyal to Indy's.
I don't care what anyone does but its a shame this site is good and has a lot of good info and good posters.
Indys is good to use that is not the point its just some people can't be honest. A girl who is not worth seeing should have a honest review to some extend. That is were Eccie comes in. While we don't want to kill her business we want to provide fair and accurate info.
