A conspiracy theory that was wrong

[chizzy]

Originally Posted by 1#Ratt

I'm not the only one who thinks so.

thats fine, just means more people are wrong........

[HDGristle]

Originally Posted by rmg_35

The factual part got me too

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

The factual part got me too

And yet, nobody dares to challenge the specific facts asserted in his first thread since returning... why is that?

Could it be because they're FACTUAL?

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by 1#Ratt

Chizzy, how does that prove anything, one of conservative has been banned many times before. But One of the 3 was never banned. then after the bitching, was banned. I personally think the Dr is now more mellow IMHO. I think the bitching had an effect.

no it didn't

it just got the several posters rage whining about berry banned

so the "great mod conspiracy" was proven wrong

don't say we didn't say so


welcome back berry

[HDGristle]

Originally Posted by lustylad

And yet, nobody dares to challenge the specific facts asserted in his first thread since returning... why is that?

Could it be because they're FACTUAL?

Could it be that some folks have become wise to the game and how its played since Amish and I laid the rules bare?

Could it be that most rational folks adjusted their ignore lists and don't feel like playing?

Could it be that many just don't give a fuck and aren't gonna engage?

Ancient astronaut theorists say yes.

[lustylad]

You engaged enough to imply a certain poster isn't factual. Which means you do give a fuck and don't have him on ignore. A rational poster would want to challenge his non-factual facts.

[HDGristle]

You went 1 for 3 there, but only because of partial credit and me rounding up.

[lustylad]

If you can't wow them with facts, just go cryptic, huh?

[HDGristle]

I hit view post. Lol'd. Commented to someone else because of history. View post only shows up if the poster is on ignore. I understand the game, including why some folks stopped posting links and how much they cut and paste vs write their own posts.

That's 1 partial correct out of 3, rounded up because I like you.

That's all super factual. Remember that the word factual also appears in post #1.

[lustylad]

Nothing wrong with cutting & pasting, although I agree one should always use quotemarks appropriately for proper attribution and include a link to the original author... Claudine Gay taught me that.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Nothing wrong with cutting & pasting, although I agree one should always use quotemarks appropriately for proper attribution and include a link to the original author... Claudine Gay taught me that.

Crikey! ... Just spilled-over me beer from laughing!

#### Salty

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Welcome back, terminator!

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

welcome back berry

Thanks !!!

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by lustylad

And yet, nobody dares to challenge the specific facts asserted in his first thread since returning... why is that?

Could it be because they're FACTUAL?

I think you adeptly answered your own question with few observations you posted in that first thread you are referring to

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

Crikey! ... Just spilled-over me beer from laughing!

#### Salty

Salty... how many times do I have to tell you - don't be pouring beer for breakfast!




.

[1#Ratt]

Originally Posted by chizzy

thats fine, just means more people are wrong........

Ok, I'll bite, what is your proof?