Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1
That’s true in a lot of ways. Though eliminating personnel isn’t exactly the way to make govt more efficient. It may save a couple of dollars but won’t improve govt.
The only way to make government run better would be to take some functions from the federal govt and move it to the state entirely. Things like block grants and payment matches are an inefficient and wasteful way to implement programs that states actually run, ie Medicaid.
Govt contract procurement is also wasteful. An example would be how govt buys fatigues (battle dress uniform) for the military. Rather than porential designs being submitted by vendors and the govt choosing the one they want, they go through a paid design process separate under each branch and then choose the one they want. So vendors that lose still get paid similarly to the winning vendor. And the silliest part is that marines fatigues are slightly different that army fatigues though they are used in the same theaters. Meaning there was a wholly separate procurement process even though ultimately the purchased fatigues aren't really different.
|
Typical swamp answer. The bloated top heavy people don't know how to be more efficient so claim they need more money and more people.
