If you ever wondered about the narrative of the LSM...

[Munchmasterman]

Another chatty cathy come lately.

The point we were discussing was the headline.
You can see we never made it further because it infuriated bb that the "huff" reported what the officials said about the motive. bb said....well you can read it yourself. He didn't give a shit how it ended. He couldn't get past the start.

He was pissed because they wouldn't editorialize at the beginning and you got pissed when they did at the end.
You can work it out with him.

You sound sensitive about trump getting "honorable mention" in this story. Yes, they took a shot at trump at the end of the story like you mentioned. This story wasn't about trump, it was about motive. The easily seen bias had nothing to do with the main subject of the story.
The bias doesn't change the fact trump frequently uses offensive rhetoric towards many people in many situations. In this case blaming trump doesn't help the situation.
Too bad trump does nothing to help the situation.

Originally Posted by eccielover

WOW. That's a great little tirade on the fine upstanding journalistic integrity of the reporter of this "piece" from the HuffPo.

Unfortunately it falls flat on it's face with the cute little editorial thrown in towards the end.



Journalistic integrity and reporting on "facts" alone my ass. It's just another in a long line of HuffPo Trump hit pieces and trying to deflect from this incident to the POTUS as well as guns and racism. They couldn't help themselves and it shows their partisan bias through and through.

If no motive is known, then why call out Trump for not citing himself as blame. I call bullshit on your protection of this "cub reporter".

And as for the earlier reference to calling out Trump for misnaming the city, it was and still is right with the headlines as an associated story. It would have been easy to mistake it as part of this one.

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

You sound sensitive about trump getting "honorable mention" in this story. Yes, they took a shot at trump at the end of the story like you mentioned.

Hmmmm, Seems you are the sensitive one in that your "cub reporter" with the "journalistic integrity" to keep the story to the "facts", did decide to editorialize and attempt to lay fault/blame/motive on Trumps words.

Face it, the story was to downplay any possible leftwing motive and to set up Trump for the fall at the end.

They did both wonderfully and in true HuffPo partisan reporting. You basically said so yourself. It didn't help, so if they are reporting "facts" why do it?

[rexdutchman]

Hiding ? , Maybe so people should read more " Beyond Belief" How the NYT ignored the Holocaust for years when Millions were dying ?
The point is Truth and media is what they say it is and now theres very little truth that isn't Political thuggery pushing some bodies agenda