Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Anybody remember when Flynn's judge Contreras recused himself mysteriously? He gave no reason. Then it turned out he was personal friends with piece of Strzok? How'd Contreras get chosen for that trial?
Yet, somehow Flynn isn't getting a new trial either.
Nothing to see here. Move along conspiracy theorists. Pay no attention to the creature behind the curtain.
What the hell does that have to do with a juror who lies about their basis in the case (the topic of this thread)...I don't expect you a leftwing nut to comprehend this!! Go back to your hand wringing about the excellent economy
What the hell does that have to do with a juror who lies about their basis in the case (the topic of this thread)...I don't expect you a leftwing nut to comprehend this!! Go back to your hand wringing about the excellent economy
This shit on the left has got so low down and dirty and corrupt that the left has turned into a complete cesspool of miscreants. Again I have to cite a credible source BECAUSE THE LSM DOESN'T DEEM THE NEWS WORTHY!!
Political Bias of Lead Stone Juror EXPOSED, Nets Respond With Blackout
By Nicholas Fondacaro | February 13, 2020 9:43 PM EST Tameka Hart, the forewoman in the federal trial against Roger Stone, was exposed on Wednesday by Daily Caller investigative reporter Chuck Ross for once being a Democratic candidate for Congress, on top of being a staunch anti-Trump opponent. While the story continued to spread online, the liberal broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC) tried to hide the revelation from their viewers.
On Thursday, the networks continued to insist (via obsession) that the only controversy with the case was Attorney General William Barr requesting a shorter incarceration period than what prosecutors were demanding.
A simple review of Hart’s Twitter account proves how politically motivated she was by far-left politics. In October of last year, she took President Trump’s strong condemnation of Turkey’s dictator and suggested our President was the real “devil.” And other deep dives of her social media history show much of the same.
Meanwhile, during the Thursday edition of Fox News Channel’s Special Report, chief White House correspondent John Roberts was helping viewers understand the Hart controversy:
But a new revelation in all of this, when the jury forewoman from the Stone trial came forward to support the four prosecutors who resigned after the recommendation was scrapped.
Tameka Hart posting on Facebook, “It pains me to see the DOJ now interfere with the hard work of the prosecutors. They acted with the utmost intelligence, integrity, and respect for our system of justice.” Hart, who works for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ran as a Democrat for Congress in 2012 and has posted tweets critical of President Trump.
Roberts also noted that “the President fired back” in a tweet that read: “Now it looks like the foreperson and the jury in the Roger Stone case had significant bias. Add that to everything else, and this is not looking good for the ‘Justice’ Department.”
But the only Trump tweets the networks were interested in were the ones they claimed, without evidence, showed that Trump was directing Barr to interfere with Stone’s sentencing.
“On Tuesday, Justice Department prosecutors recommended a seven to nine-year prison sentence for the President's close friend, Roger Stone,” reported ABC Justice correspondent Pierre Thomas on World News Tonight. “The President, furious, tweeting, ‘Cannot allow this miscarriage of justice!’ And just hours later, the Attorney General officially overruling his own prosecutors to recommend a lighter sentence.”
In an exclusive interview, Thomas pressed Barr: “Did you talk to the President at all about your decision regarding the recommendations?” The other networks all ran the soundbites.
Speaking of tweets about the Stone case, Ross actually uncovered an instance of Hart retweeting criticism of Trump’s outrage at how Stone was arrested.
The transcript is below, click "expand" to read:
Fox News Channel’s Special Report
February 13, 2020
6:02:58 p.m. Eastern
(…)
JOHN ROBERTS: But a new revelation in all of this, when the jury forewoman from the Stone trial came forward to support the four prosecutors who resigned after the recommendation was scrapped.
Tameka Hart posting on Facebook, “It pains me to see the DOJ now interfere with the hard work of the prosecutors. They acted with the utmost intelligence, integrity, and respect for our system of justice.” Hart, who works for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ran as a Democrat for Congress in 2012 and has posted tweets critical of President Trump.
The President fired back, “Now it looks like the foreperson and the jury in the Roger Stone case had significant bias. Add that to everything else, and this is not looking good for the ‘Justice’ Department.”
In a statement to Fox News, Stone's attorney Grant Smith says, “Mr. Stone and his defense team are diligently reviewing the newly reported information to determine any appropriate next steps.”
(…)
Come on guy....wakey wakey...is that the best you can muster...quoting some half baked BS from an ultra Reich wing rag as in the Daily Caller, published by none other that Tom cat Tucker Carlson....stop reading that garbage and start reading the real news. It’s just an extension of Faux Fox News better known as Trump Tv and propaganda arm of Don the Con. The REAL reason for this facade is that the judge that dished out the sentences was not a Trump appointee. Now he thinks he can meddle in the judicial process. To help out his corrupt buddies. Pathetic
Come on guy....wakey wakey...is that the best you can muster...quoting some half baked BS from an ultra Reich wing rag as in the Daily Caller, published by none other that Tom cat Tucker Carlson....stop reading that garbage and start reading the real news. It’s just an extension of Faux Fox News better known as Trump Tv and propaganda arm of Don the Con. The REAL reason for this facade is that the judge that dished out the sentences was not a Trump appointee. Now he thinks he can meddle in the judicial process. To help out his corrupt buddies. Pathetic
President Clinton's pardon of Marc Rich is a saga of secrecy, tenacity, sleight of hand and pressure from Rich's ex-wife and one of her friends, who together have steered millions of dollars to Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton's causes and those of fellow Democrats.
Whether it is a story of bribery as well or illegal gifts from abroad is the subject of congressional inquiries and a criminal investigation by the FBI and the U.S. attorney's office in New York.
Behind the pardon is a tale of intrigue, unintentional humor and celebrity involving, among others, two former Israeli prime ministers, a onetime operative for the Mossad, a stubborn U.S. attorney and a misunderstood desire to find a rabbi in the White House.
if you were half as smart as yous think you are you'd still be stupid.
Come on guy....wakey wakey...is that the best you can muster...quoting some half baked BS from an ultra Reich wing rag as in the Daily Caller, published by none other that Tom cat Tucker Carlson....stop reading that garbage and start reading the real news. It’s just an extension of Faux Fox News better known as Trump Tv and propaganda arm of Don the Con. The REAL reason for this facade is that the judge that dished out the sentences was not a Trump appointee. Now he thinks he can meddle in the judicial process. To help out his corrupt buddies. Pathetic
The story is FACT...as you say "Pathetic" is when the LSM doesn't find a juror LYING when taking the oath news worthy. Oath: After the jurors are selected, they are required to take a solemn oath (or to affirm) that they will "well and truly try the matters in issue and a true verdict render according to the evidence and the law." When jurors take this oath, they become a judge of all questions of fact and are duty bound to act fairly ...
ACT fairly my ASS!!
Oath: After the jurors are selected, they are required to take a solemn oath (or to affirm) that they will "well and truly try the matters in issue and a true verdict render according to the evidence and the law." When jurors take this oath, they become a judge of all questions of fact and are duty bound to act fairly ...
And there are punishments for lying under oath...but you being a Liberaltarian it shouldn't matter if it was done by the left or the right.
Oath: After the jurors are selected, they are required to take a solemn oath (or to affirm) that they will "well and truly try the matters in issue and a true verdict render according to the evidence and the law." When jurors take this oath, they become a judge of all questions of fact and are duty bound to act fairly ...
And there are punishments for lying under oath...but you being a Liberaltarian it shouldn't matter if it was done by the left or the right.
Jesus Christ you dumbass mutherfucker.
There were how many other jurors in that box that voted to convict?
And who says you can't hate Trump and still be a fair juror in the Stone trial.
The Defense had their chance to select jurors just like the prosecution.
Why are you crying about this? He had is day in court. Trump is being chickenshit. He should just pardon him and deal with the fallout if any.
There were how many other jurors in that box that voted to convict?
And who says you can't hate Trump and still be a fair juror in the Stone trial.
The Defense had their chance to select jurors just like the prosecution.
Why are you crying about this? He had is day in court. Trump is being chickenshit. He should just pardon him and deal with the fallout if any.
one bad faithless juror can influence other jurors in making an incorrect decision.
so it does matter.
jury pool was tainted.
blame that on Flynn's first lawyer who was fired (he was fired for other reasons, but not this one) for failing to due diligence in vetting the jury pool.
one bad faithless juror can influence other jurors in making an incorrect decision.
so it does matter.
jury pool was tainted.
blame that on Flynn's first lawyer who was fired (he was fired for other reasons, but not this one) for failing to due diligence in vetting the jury pool.
You do not even know wtf you are talking about. Flynn did not go to trial. He plead GUILTY to lying....which is the exact same thing the President FIRED him for.
Rodger Stone case …. there is no evidence of jury misconduct. He has not fired his lawyer.
According to LexyLiar….it matters not who picks the jury!
Tameka Hart, the forewoman in the federal trial against Roger Stone, was 
