Review: Opportunities forever lost

[Livonia]

Originally Posted by MrGiz

How clearly must a girl state in her ads, profiles, websites, etc.... "no verbal or written explicit mention of sexual activity when contacting " ? Could it be considered "rude " to not comply with her wishes in that regard? How many times do we also see them say that they will hang-up or delete if we do not comply with that rather simple request?

Rude.... is obviously , a relative term!!

Giz

When I first called her Friday to find out more info, she openly discussed some items, just not the covered aspect. So she verbally mentioned activities.

[Commander Salamander]

Originally Posted by MacTheKnife

Now I am totally confused.

Did both you and Livonia see the same lady?

Yes

[Livonia]

Originally Posted by MacTheKnife

Now I am totally confused.

Did both you and Livonia see the same lady?

Well technically I didn't see her lol, but I believe both of us had contact with Brittney

[searcyslave]

Originally Posted by MacTheKnife

searcy,

You said you wasted money on her TWICE but posted a positive review.

Help me out. What went wrong?

And how do you communicate with a provider without giving her your phone number?

Hi Mac, if you will re-read my second review of her, http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=103197 you can clearly see that I explained the positive review as giving her the benefit of doubt on the first visit... Yes you are correct about communicating and phone numbers, But what about something called PROFESSIONALISM on a provider's part? I talk to a couple of Ladies on a regular basis, yet they don't continually blow up the phone, the are true professionals and respectful, Not this girl...

[Mr.Chan]

Believe is sufficient to say that lady is young, pretty and legitimate. However some have experienced spotty service and inconsistent result. Let opinion be so. If matter raise question in mind do not shoot messenger, go see for self.

[MacTheKnife]

Originally Posted by Mr.Chan

If matter raise question in mind do not shoot messenger, go see for self.

I would love to, but she violates 2 of my principles in choosing a provider.

Her youth is not one of them. I have been with younger ones.

I was simply trying to clarify why there is such a disparity in the reviews of supposedly the SAME lady. Perhaps the difference is the "click" factor. I don't know but she does appear interesting to say the least.

[Mr.Chan]

Have observed that in youthful provider results tend to be inconsistent. Perhaps is just nature of beast, whim or indecisiveness. For some is total negative, for others not. If
predictability is required, more mature provider is better value. As ladies so often point out, all they sell is time. Neglect perhaps to understand that what clients pay for is service.

Originally Posted by MacTheKnife

I would love to, but she violates 2 of my principles in choosing a provider.

Her youth is not one of them. I have been with younger ones.

I was simply trying to clarify why there is such a disparity in the reviews of supposedly the SAME lady. Perhaps the difference is the "click" factor. I don't know but she does appear interesting to say the least.

[MacTheKnife]

Originally Posted by Mr.Chan

Have observed that in youthful provider results tend to be inconsistent. Perhaps is just nature of beast, whim or indecisiveness. For some is total negative, for others not. If
predictability is required, more mature provider is better value. As ladies so often point out, all they sell is time. Neglect perhaps to understand that what clients pay for is service.

I agree 100 percent.