Advice on giving a 'No' review (this may help the Ladies cope better when they get one.)

[ManSlut]

Says the woman with the low rent apartment with a Lava Lamp and Walmart computer desk who loves the TS crowd for Besties...Kitty, just learn to shut up, this game has always been too much for you. Just posts ads, when are you going to ever learn Merciana?..Smh

[L.A.]

I think J. G.'s writing style is too intelligent for 9 toed Mya. BSB on the other hand makes more sense but what do I know.

I'm sure I'll get flamed for this but why are you writing an advice post on how to write a NO review when a few posts later you clearly state you don't write reviews anymore?

[ManSlut]

Excellent question L.A...I am going to come out of review writing retirement soon with a 'No' on Pradise but an emphatic 'Yes' on Temptress Jessica, but I also felt the point of this thread is justifiable and helpful whether I do or I don't.

Also, completely agree with you on 9 toed Mya & the BSB comparison.

Absolutely nothing to flame you about.

Please give me your opinion about the topic of this thread L.A.? I would love to see it get back on track now.

[ManSlut]

Originally Posted by Analeese

Great post Slut....

Providers might overreact because a NO review can negatively affect your business...

And if you did everything humanly possible to please the client leaving the no review...but he just wasn't satisfied.. There really isn't much you can do ..

I just received my first No recently...I wasn't happy about it... Didn't really understand it...but it is what it is... And it's about to be on the second page....so I'm recovering nicely... Best thing you can do is regroup and just be on your A game...

Once again..good post...Thanks

You're welcome Analeese and Thank You as well.

[grean]

Well here is some advice to the ladies in regards to "NO" reviews & coed NCNS threads


Do nothing. Do not respond in anyway ever to the thread or create your own self alerting thread!

There is nothing gained by any response. Responding will almost always cause more harm than good.


Nothing else is attached to your profile except that one poor review.

When guys search your posts looking to see if you do something or don't do something completely unrelated to that review, if you don't respond or create any additional threads, they won't see anything else.

There is a good chance they NEVER see a NCNS thread about you as long as you never, ever, never ever, ever respond to it.

[TexasDave555]

Originally Posted by ManSlut

My opinion of what qualifies for a 'No' review is this and only this - If I wouldn't spend the EXACT same dollar amount for the experience I just received with the Provider, barring anything that was my fault, like I petered out due to a hard day and it was too late for my body to enjoy myself (it happens from time to time) then it should be a 'No' review...I don't go to a restaurant no matter what kind of good things I have read or heard about the place beforehand and when I go there get bad service or bad food or a crappy atmosphere and really feel like every going back there again.... It's the same with P4P with me.

Okay, now here is my suggestion to the Gentlemen about writing the 'No' review after you have decided to write it and this may cut down on the Provider overreacting to it:

After you post the review immediately be the first to respond to your review by simply adding a little detail why the 'No', for instance - 1) She's too much YMMV 2) Her pics are dated, she's less attractive now 3) She smokes, I hate smoker's breath 4) Her skills, her incall level, or her TCB simply don't justify $300 an hour in my opinion, 5) Maybe you just didn't click....etc., etc., etc....You get the point, whatever YOUR reason or main reason for the 'No' include it so she can see the reason and maybe rationally not overreact to it, which as we know, generally only makes her look worse when she does...Just be sincere and honest about your reasoning in the post.

There can be many reasons for a No but my advice has always been the same on negative reviews.... A session has to have taken place.... NCNS are different animals.

Be pointed, don't beat around the bush with subtlety... be direct in what you found lacking.
Don't be a dick.... no need to create MORE drama than a negative review already will.
Don't respond after posting, unless someone asks for clarification. Again, reduce the drama by not participating.
When/If a response is posted by the provider, post the link to your review in the thread and simply say, I stand by my review. Don't get into a defensive position or go on offense. Just post the link and move on.
Remember that the reviews are for the customers. That is your audience, so if you want to help someone avoid a bad experience, make sure you don't leave anything out.
Don't be afraid to post a negative no matter who it is or how large her stable of WK's is.

[L.A.]

Originally Posted by ManSlut

Please give me your opinion about the topic of this thread L.A.? I would love to see it get back on track now.

I might look at it a little differently than some others do.
It takes a lot for me to put NO in the recommendation field. I most definitely will not put NO simply because I would not repeat (lots of negatives there). There are too many variables that come into play for a repeat visit. I would put NO if I'm shorted on time, if I didn't get the services agreed upon, major hygiene issues, etc, but not simply on the fact I wouldn't see her again. If there is something that I feel people need to know I might put Yes-but read the ROS. If the session is just kinda Blah....I might not even write a review.
Right or wrong, there are providers here that rely on this income to survive, feed their kid, or whatever, and there is no way I'm going to try to hurt their business just because the session didn't knock my socks off. There has to be a good reason for me to put NO. I'm not saying I won't write an honest review, I'll put the details in ROS.
Concerning helping people without PA: that's not something I really concern myself with. It's easy to get and keep.

Now about that pradise review....I'm really looking forward to that one because I've been on the fence about seeing her for a long time.

[Chung Tran]

I agree with what L.A. posted, with the addition that the "no" recommendation is simply the final word of what should be a lengthy post about why you are giving a "no".. if you are as informative as you should be, the reader should anticipate halfway through the narrative, that a "no" is on the way.

I agree with grean, regarding ladies reactions to a "no".. ignore and move on.. BUT...

if the reviewer gives an honest account, AND you admit personal fault.. go ahead and admit your role, and apologize. humility is extremely underrated.

[grean]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

I agree with what L.A. posted, with the addition that the "no" recommendation is simply the final word of what should be a lengthy post about why you are giving a "no".. if you are as informative as you should be, the reader should anticipate halfway through the narrative, that a "no" is on the way.

Others give out a yes to avoid drama.Unless you have illegal access you'll never know that they described a nightmare in their review of you. I would honestly worry more about those. Unless you're daft, you should know if the guy had a reasonably good time. If you know it was a shitty session but still get a yes from him. It's 50/50 on whether or not he elborated on his bad experience or not but still gave you a yes.

Also, ladies, we do weigh who the no is from. Some guys think a yes means they are vouching for you to the Mob. They describe a dream but then hand out a "no".

Relax, most of us can tell the difference between a genuinely bad session and a guy just trying to prove he is not scared to give a "no."

[OneStarLuck07]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

I agree with grean, regarding ladies reactions to a "no".. ignore and move on.. BUT...

if the reviewer gives an honest account, AND you admit personal fault.. go ahead and admit your role, and apologize. humility is extremely underrated.

Totally agree grean's statements above, but Chang has a great point too. If I were to observe a provider receiving a "NO" and she posted a thread that she was sincerly sorry about the bad experience and takes full responsibility for whatever negatives happened during a session, and how she hopes to improve upon her mistakes, it would probably increase my chances of giving her a shot. Of course the problem is, if she really can't see the ROS, she may not know what went wrong or what to improve.

Now starting a thread to bash the guy, unless he truely did something threatening or dangerous, will not end well.

[grean]

Originally Posted by OneStarLuck07

Totally agree grean's statements above, but Chang has a great point too. If I were to observe a provider receiving a "NO" and she posted a thread that she was sincerly sorry about the bad experience and takes full responsibility for whatever negatives happened during a session, and how she hopes to improve upon her mistakes, it would probably increase my chances of giving her a shot. Of course the problem is, if she really can't see the ROS, she may not know what went wrong or what to improve.

Now starting a thread to bash the guy, unless he truely did something threatening or dangerous, will not end well.

Absolutely if she feels that an apology is appropriate and is willing to make an offer to satisfy the client she should send him a PM to do so. I meant only she should not respond in a public forum.

Since they cannot see the ROS, and yes, I know this will be grossly unpopular before I say it, I think "No" reviews should be embraced by providers.

They were there and know what happened and if they receive a poor review, they can improve. Where as of they perform poorly and are given a YES, they may believe the performance was adequate and continue losing dissatisfied clients who don't even bother reviewing.

A lot of guys are one time shoppers. Good bad or indifferent, they aren't planning to see that provider again. The ladies are aware of that. Therefore, if they get a yes review from a guy that they never see again, how will they know it was because he was actually dissatisfied, unless he states so in his review?

[johnspice]

You spoke my mind there!

Originally Posted by L.A.

I most definitely will not put NO simply because I would not repeat (lots of negatives there). There are too many variables that come into play for a repeat visit. I would put NO if I'm shorted on time, if I didn't get the services agreed upon, major hygiene issues, etc, but not simply on the fact I wouldn't see her again. If there is something that I feel people need to know I might put Yes-but read the ROS. If the session is just kinda Blah....I might not even write a review.
Right or wrong, there are providers here that rely on this income to survive, feed their kid, or whatever, and there is no way I'm going to try to hurt their business just because the session didn't knock my socks off. There has to be a good reason for me to put NO. I'm not saying I won't write an honest review, I'll put the details in ROS.

[Bonferroni]

One other interesting consideration. When you view the reviews, 10 are posted for each page. So after 10 additional reviews, that No will slide to page 2. Rarely do I view reviews that are after the first page.

[Analeese]

Originally Posted by Bonferroni

One other interesting consideration. When you view the reviews, 10 are posted for each page. So after 10 additional reviews, that No will slide to page 2. Rarely do I view reviews that are after the first page.

Yes I totally agree this is an interesting consideration...

[Guest070818-1]

Since my name was brought up in this . . .

Manslut - If memory serves me correct, you are the one who called me regarding the whole Mya fiasco. You told me everything that happened between you and her. From talking to you, you sounded like a person that lives, breaths and shits drama.

Just a toxic individual.

Which, looking back on that, I should've been the bigger woman and gracefully excused myself from the drama instead of feeding into it. At that time, drama was fun to divulge in when you're bored, but now I actually have a life to live.

Also, regarding the gonorrhea/clap allegations, it sounds like you still have an agenda against me ever since I called you out about BB'ing a provider against her will. Which, you are very lucky that she didn't press charges.

All in all, you need to get over that chip on your shoulder. All this constant bitching and complaining about others online . . . I can only take so fucking much.

Sweet Regards,
Adrienne Baptiste