66% Want To See Bolton Testify In Senate Impeachment Trial

[oeb11]

I think a dismissal prior to airing the case is a grave error - repeating the House biased star chamber proceedings in reverse.

Put on the trial with non-partisan rules, hear the "evidence" and decide if any further witnesses are needed.

Pelosi is screaming for more witnesses - but it is not the job of the Senate to Impeach - just to hear the trial. Sente has no need to do Nazi Pelosi's work for her. It was imperative to rush the Impeachment as Trump was "exigent threat " to America - then she sat on it for weeks.

The usual nazi DPST hypocrisy.

If the Senate votes to hear more witnesses - so be it.



Sorry - J666 - Nazi Pelosi does not rule the Senate.

[Jaxson66]

Rules is the right word. Moscow Mitch rules the Senate, why do you think 250 bi partisan bills are setting on his desk gathering dust. He has no intentions of working for anyone other than himself and the trump regime.

[nevergaveitathought]

Originally Posted by oeb11

I think a dismissal prior to airing the case is a grave error -

it just might be before the american people

but before the eyes of an abstract lady justice, not so much

and it is a very tempting response to the travesty that is this impeachment

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by bambino

I want everyone to testify. Schiff, cockblower, both Biden’s.

Fine by me. No exceptions.

BTW, John Bolton is one individual I would recognize on the street since he is so distinctive looking.

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Credible news media are reporting Moscow Mitch doesn’t have the votes for dismissal. Seems like the court of public opinion is having a early effect on the trial. One poll has 66% wanting testimony from witnesses like Bolton, Mulvaney, and Duffy.

Credible News from where?

[oeb11]

Quote:
Originally Posted by oeb11
I think a dismissal prior to airing the case is a grave error -


NGIT-it just might be before the american people

but before the eyes of an abstract lady justice, not so much

and it is a very tempting response to the travesty that is this impeachment



The House Impeachment is indeed a travesty. The Senate should show there is respect in at least one chamber of Congress for the Constitution. Time to hear the House case and with respect for the gravity of the Constitution and process - examine it closely and Vote.

And if the Senate desires further witnesses after the House presentation - so be it.

Let the Senate not respond to a travesty of an Impeachment with disregard - and thus creating another travesty.

The American people are owed that.

IMHO

[oeb11]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Rules is the right word. Moscow Mitch rules the Senate, why do you think 250 bi partisan bills are setting on his desk gathering dust. He has no intentions of working for anyone other than himself and the trump regime.

Other "bipartisan bills" have no bearing on the Rules for a Senate Trial
What you consider a "bipartsan bill" - those opposed by sensible conservatives - is laughable.

Conflating apples and oranges only creates your TDS
Thank you j 666,

Get a new avatar.

[Budman]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

Give your sack a pulls

He doesn't have a sack. Well maybe in his mouth.

[Budman]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Rules is the right word. Moscow Mitch rules the Senate, why do you think 250 bi partisan bills are setting on his desk gathering dust. He has no intentions of working for anyone other than himself and the trump regime.

He's playing by Harry Reid's rules. Tough shit.

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by oeb11

I think a dismissal prior to airing the case is a grave error - repeating the House biased star chamber proceedings in reverse.

.....

If the Senate votes to hear more witnesses - so be it.

Sorry - J666 - Nazi Pelosi does not rule the Senate.

Not making this an embarrassing ordeal to Nancy just makes it easier for her to try it again.

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

BTW, John Bolton is one individual I would recognize on the street since he is so distinctive looking.

...Other than his mustache there's nothing distinctive about Bolton's appearance. He looks like any other old white man with glasses.

[oeb11]

G - Nazi Pelosi is already planning Impeachment 2021!!!!

[00 gauge]

I'm sure she is, and if he's re-elected in 2020, then by God the will of the voters be damned !! .....

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

Not making this an embarrassing ordeal to Nancy just makes it easier for her to try it again.

...Other than his mustache there's nothing distinctive about Bolton's appearance. He looks like any other old white man with glasses.

The mustache is exactly what I referring to. That mustache on an old white man.

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by Budman

He's playing by Harry Reid's rules. Tough shit.

Then again, the rules can be changed with a majority vote of 51. There are reports moderate GOP Senators are rocking the boat. The dismissal scenario is kaput, tuff shit.

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by oeb11

G - Nazi Pelosi is already planning Impeachment 2021!!!!

That’s unlikely, but opening hearings after the Don Mcghan court ruling is definitely a probability. Lots more to learn from that case.