Fake news, fake presidency, . . . . Fake science?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

I read a couple of reviews...so, you're a writer.

The "cheif" OP?

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

An old friend said frequently:

"The infection will out!" ..... Yours just did.

The "fall out" from your "exposure" is non-nuclear.

What has fallen out? Do tell. And try to be specific with your analysis, please.

Originally Posted by LexusLover

So the "Google suggestion" is "cheif"?

It was a 50/50 shot. I went with the suggestion that popped up.

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Now about your personal experience in nuclear contamination.

What I can say is that I had the "rare privilege" to visit a test site. Other than that it would be a case of "can't confirm nor deny" or "if I told you I would have to ____ you" sort of thing. Beleive it or not.

Originally Posted by Jackie S

One wants to wipe out Western Society in the name of their God, the other in the name of Totalitarianism.

I was trying to ask a question about the hard science ("i" before "e" except after . . . oh forget it) and information we are supposed to be getting from the CDC. Should we trust it?

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Okay, now we know that you are crippled. I also suspect that you were someone else in a previous life.

Where the hell did that come from? Who? And in what position? (I know I'm just asking for the gay joke here.) Suspicions?

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Why attack me through the navy...sounds like you knew me before.

It's a branch thing. Thought you knew. Don't be so fuckin' sensitive Chief "ignores-the-question".

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Just say something concrete like you think North Korea is justified in having nukes.

Just tell me what to think why don't you!

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

I read a couple of reviews...so, you're a writer. Sounds like you do film noir or travel brochures.

Correction: I'm a thinker.

Film noir or travel brochures? Hmmm. Fear or flight. Which do you think? Or do you? Who should I ask what you think? Or you could ignore my questions again, Chiefie.

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

The "cheif" OP?

goof and guffaw


I was on a roll writing starting my thread and I went with it. I'll live with a stupid mistake like that.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

I read a couple of reviews...so, you're a writer. Sounds like you do film noir or travel brochures.

I did too, JDrunk!

YOWTCH!

Do you carry hand sanitizer around with you?

[eccieuser9500]

Are you asking me or Bcorn"ed"?

[the_real_Barleycorn]

Pay no attention to Assup. He thinks he's being very cute when he calls me a drunk when I've said many times that I don't and never have drank. He is unable to comprehend simple phrases and unworthy of anyone to respond to him.

Back to you; I know creative and descriptive writing. I don't agree with what I think you're trying to say but I have to acknowledge some very good reviews. As for my technical background; I was part of damage control on the ships I served on. That means that I knew the basics (and a little bit more) about NBC warfare on a naval ship. Plus, I was also a student at the Naval Nuclear Power School in Orlando, FL. That means I write you up some good equations on nuclear energy and am conversant in what happens to a human body when exposed to different types of radiation.

So what travel brochures have you written?

[Mr MojoRisin]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

What has fallen out? Do tell. And try to be specific with your analysis, please.



It was a 50/50 shot. I went with the suggestion that popped up.



What I can say is that I had the "rare privilege" to visit a test site. Other than that it would be a case of "can't confirm nor deny" or "if I told you I would have to ____ you" sort of thing. Beleive it or not.



I was trying to ask a question about the hard science ("i" before "e" except after . . . oh forget it) and information we are supposed to be getting from the CDC. Should we trust it?



Where the hell did that come from? Who? And in what position? (I know I'm just asking for the gay joke here.) Suspicions?



It's a branch thing. Thought you knew. Don't be so fuckin' sensitive Chief "ignores-the-question".



Just tell me what to think why don't you!

Correction: I'm a thinker.

Film noir or travel brochures? Hmmm. Fear or flight. Which do you think? Or do you? Who should I ask what you think? Or you could ignore my questions again, Chiefie.

If you're so concerned about Nuclear radiation exposure here's a short article. There are tons of them out there. This one should be pretty easy for a laymen like yourself to understand.

Jim


https://gizmodo.com/5928171/what-nuc...s-to-your-body

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Pay no attention to Assup. He thinks he's being very cute when he calls me a drunk when I've said many times that I don't and never have drank. He is unable to comprehend simple phrases and unworthy of anyone to respond to him.

Thank you and I would be remissed if I did not the same with Sistine Chapel. He means well.

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

I don't agree with what I think you're trying to say but I have to acknowledge some very good reviews.

Such is the dichotomy of life.

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

technical background

basics

damage control

Logistics maintenance and storage of said power. Can you tell me the measurement of radiation for exposure within a forty-mile radius of a specific location after testing? Hydrogen testing in the fifties.

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

So what travel brochures have you written?

Let me tell you about a vacation spot you must beleive before you see.




A vast nothingness for a radius of what you can only imagine to . . . be . . . forty-something miles? Maybe. What is a mile when you lose all perspective of distance. Tangibly.

I beams. Bent. Nothing but earth. Earth! Dirt. Very little in your line of vision as you rotate 180 degrees. You only need 5 minutes to understand this is what the end of the world looks like.

Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

If you're so concerned about Nuclear radiation exposure here's a short article. There are tons of them out there. This one should be pretty easy for a laymen like yourself to understand.

Jim


https://gizmodo.com/5928171/what-nuc...s-to-your-body

Thank you. That's the problem. Who to beleive? There is so much out there.

[dilbert firestorm]

couldn't you come up with a better name than eccieuser9500??? the mods here can fix it for ya!

[eccieuser9500]

It's kind of grown on me. Like a mushroom.

Let's suppose a young man in his early twenties was on an exclusive "tour" for 2 hours looking at the crater, the physical destruction and all of what little is left for miles around in the year 2000. (Gove or take 4 years) Is it possible visiting the site, after so many years since the test, the side effects of contamination show up years later. Or shortly after? Only to be misdiagnosed? Leading to my original question: Fake science? Do we beleive a government agency? CDC, AMA, WHO? (WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, TFF!)

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Logistics maintenance and storage of said power.


That's the problem. Who to beleive? There is so much out there.

Interesting the map discloses no sites in Texas. Why not?



I guess not all "maps" are created equal.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Interesting the map discloses no sites in Texas. Why not?



I guess not all "maps" are created equal.

Where are the nuclear test sites in Texas, SHARKY?

Galveston?

Do you need a parking permit?

[Mr MojoRisin]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

It's kind of grown on me. Like a mushroom.

Let's suppose a young man in his early twenties was on an exclusive "tour" for 2 hours looking at the crater, the physical destruction and all of what little is left for miles around in the year 2000. (Gove or take 4 years) Is it possible visiting the site, after so many years since the test, the side effects of contamination show up years later. Or shortly after? Only to be misdiagnosed? Leading to my original question: Fake science? Do we beleive a government agency? CDC, AMA, WHO? (WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, TFF!)

Were you exposed to radiation in your twenties and now concerned about future health complications due to high does of Radiation Exposure?


Jim

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Logistics maintenance and storage of said power.

If the Government were going to control internet communication as far as access is concerned, there should be a minimum, mandatory reading-comprehension test administered to allow participation.

AssUp would be prohibited from participating. Making America Great!

One Hooligan at a time!

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Were you exposed to radiation in your twenties and now concerned about future health complications due to high does of Radiation Exposure?


Jim

Yes. Current and future. Who's to say it was high doses of exposure?