Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Lad, the emails that were sent to Hillary were clearly labeled "UNCLASSIFIED" on the very top line of the email. Here is the proof....
You can't possibly be serious. You do know that the emails sent to Hillary included 22 with the highest possible security classification, right? It's called SAP and it covers matters so sensitive that the contents of the 22 emails could not even be divulged to the Inspector General who discovered their existence while investigating this staggering security breach and scandal!
Now tell me again what your argument is, flighty. Are you seriously suggesting those 22 SAP emails found on the hildebeest's private server were erroneously marked UNCLASSIFIED?
Oh, and one more question for you, flighty.... let's assume a US Secretary of State receives an email containing, say, satellite photos of a North Korean nuclear weapons site.... do you think a prudent, competent, and security-minded Secretary of State just might be expected to recognize this as extremely sensitive regardless of its classification label?
You should stick to washing bottles, flighty. Your princess Hildebeest is on record directing one of her minions to remove the security classification markings and send that material to her by insecure means, flighty. Your whole position is exposed as a fallacious charade, flighty. Hildebeest was told she couldn't use an insecure device, flighty, but she did it anyway. Hildebeest knew she was violating security protocols, flighty, and that's why she directed her minion to remove the classification markers from the classified document.
+1
Btw I think ex-CEO is right. hildebeest should not be capitalized.
Now tell me again what your argument is, flighty. Are you seriously suggesting those 22 SAP emails found on the hildebeest's private server were erroneously marked UNCLASSIFIED?
Oh, and one more question for you, flighty.... let's assume a US Secretary of State receives an email containing, say, satellite photos of a North Korean nuclear weapons site.... do you think a prudent, competent, and security-minded Secretary of State just might be expected to recognize this as extremely sensitive regardless of its classification label?
LAD, did you read the link that was in post #249? The link from the Washington Post lists all of the staffers that sent Hillary emails and how many emails they sent. They were all marked UNCLASSIFIED, just like in the example that was posted. If you have an issue with the Washington Post take it up with them.
Regarding your question. The BURDEN does not change because of how sensitive the information is. You can dream up any hypothetical you want, the BURDEN is on the sender not the recipient. It is a State Department rule. If you don't like their rule take it up the State Department.
Hillary made a public statement that she did not send or receive emails that were labeled CLASSIFIED. So far this has been proven to be a true statement. The State Department changed the classification of some of the emails to CLASSIFIED months after they were originally sent.
From the link.
Material not allowed on non-approved systems
Federal rules prohibit sharing classified material on non-approved or personal systems. Regulations dictate the burden is on the sender of an e-mail to classify its security clearance level.
LAD, did you read the link that was in post #249? The link from the Washington Post lists all of the staffers that sent Hillary emails and how many emails they sent. They were all marked UNCLASSIFIED, just like in the example that was posted. If you have an issue with the Washington Post take it up with them.
Regarding your question. The BURDEN does not change because of how sensitive the information is. You can dream up any hypothetical you want, the BURDEN is on the sender not the recipient. It is a State Department rule. If you don't like their rule take it up the State Department.
Hillary made a public statement that she did not send or receive emails that were labeled CLASSIFIED. So far this has been proven to be a true statement. The State Department changed the classification of some of the emails to CLASSIFIED months after they were originally sent.
From the link.
Material not allowed on non-approved systems
Federal rules prohibit sharing classified material on non-approved or personal systems. Regulations dictate the burden is on the sender of an e-mail to classify its security clearance level.
not a typo I just like frigger65 better than frighter65 so sue me...
