the riots and violence

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by boardman

You continue to cherry pick for some perceived flaw rather than understanding we agree on the point.

Again, you are wrong. We don't agree when you keep posting your general statement. I hope you realize there are loons on here who take some of this bullshit literally and act upon it!

It's the internet!

You are defending SoldierBoy's remark and trying to claim it as the same ... it's not. All the SCOTUS opinion says is there is no U.S. Constitutional duty generally for LE to protect citizens. That's it!

To broaden it into something else ... is wrong! He did and you are!

Texas statute controls Texas LE ... the most important is Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

And Texas has a Constitution as well.

[tbone2u]

Originally Posted by p73777

No interest in politics
But what is the point of causing chaos?
Don’t people hate the chaos?

This is a thread about violence and rioting.
Both are political
You need to ask the rioters and the people in Chicago your question.
I don't have the answer.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by tbone2u

This is a thread about violence and rioting.

It is? I almost forgot! Thank you!

In 2020 it IS ABOUT POLITICS.

Trump is up for re-election. All else failed. So burn, destroy, and steal.

Blame it on Trump!

Thank God for the 2nd Amendment!

[USAsoldier]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Again, you are wrong. We don't agree when you keep posting your general statement. I hope you realize there are loons on here who take some of this bullshit literally and act upon it!

It's the internet!

You are defending SoldierBoy's remark and trying to claim it as the same ... it's not. All the SCOTUS opinion says is there is no U.S. Constitutional duty generally for LE to protect citizens. That's it!

To broaden it into something else ... is wrong! He did and you are!

Texas statute controls Texas LE ... the most important is Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

And Texas has a Constitution as well.

++++++++++++++++++

With all due respect sir, you started this avalanche of distorting facts and manipulating my posts. I think what happened is, respectfully, you lost your train of thought and went on this weird personal feelings tangent about law enforcement, and you couldn't recover from that.

Anyways...

Yes Texas has a State Constitution, as do all states in the Union. But they are all superceded by the US Constitution, and the law of the land is the US Supreme Court.

Case closed! *bangs gavel*

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by USAsoldier

Yes Texas has a State Constitution, as do all states in the Union. But they are all superceded by the US Constitution, and the law of the land is the US Supreme Court.

Case closed! *bangs gavel*

You really are ignorant ... and I'm being generous.

This proves you are just dumb:

"...and the law of the land is the US Supreme Court."

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 2.13.

DUTIES AND POWERS. (a) It is the duty of every peace officer to preserve the peace within the officer's jurisdiction. To effect this purpose, the officer shall use all lawful means.
(b)......"

There is a list .... and it even gets specific.

Now you're the self-proclaimed law enforcement expert by virtue of your friends and family .... with your anecdotal bullshit.

Your "case" is "closed"! You no longer have a "case"!

[tbone2u]

Give the boy some credit LL. At least he knows what a gavel is.

[USAsoldier]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

You really are ignorant ... and I'm being generous.

This proves you are just dumb:

"...and the law of the land is the US Supreme Court."

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 2.13. "It is the duty of every peace officer to preserve the peace.

There is a list .... and it even gets specific.

Now you're the self-proclaimed law enforcement expert by virtue of your friends and family .... with your anecdotal bullshit.

Your "case" is "closed"! You no longer have a "case"!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hmmm... wonder why you left out the rest of the TX Codes of Criminal Procedures pertaining to the duties and powers of a peace officer? Don't worry, I'll fill in the rest.

Texas Code Of Criminal Procedure-
Art. 2.13. [37] [44] [45] DUTIES AND POWERS.
(a) It is the duty of every peace officer to preserve the peace within the officer's jurisdiction. To effect this purpose, the officer shall use all lawful means.
(b) The officer shall:
(1) in every case authorized by the provisions of this Code, interfere without warrant to prevent or suppress crime;
(2) execute all lawful process issued to the officer by any magistrate or court
(3) give notice to some magistrate of all offenses committed within the officer's jurisdiction, where the officer has good reason to believe there has been a violation of the penal law; (4) arrest offenders without warrant in every case where the officer is authorized by law, in order that they may be taken before the proper magistrate or court and be tried.

Interesting, doesn't mention any code or procedure that requires a Texas peace officer the duty to risk their life, or to protect you. Doesn't mention it anywhere at all.

Mr. Lexus Lover, you sir have put yourself in Point Nemo, in the ocean drowning. The closest thing to save you sir, is a passing satellite.

[O'Mike]

Two peace officers shot in the head during a traffic stop in Tulsa yesterday. Anybody rioting, having a fit over this? How many people even know about it, MSM is suppressing it. If it ain't to their agenda, they act like it didn't happen. Shameful.


https://www.fox23.com/news/local/two...OSJCZHEZZD67I/


Would you expect the story to be all over the news if the victim(s) had been a criminal(s)?

[O'Mike]

Discusting follow up to the couple in St.Louis who I posted about earlier defending their property from BLM.


They may be prosecuted. What kind of world do we want to live in where people committing criminal acts (vandalism, breaking and entering private property and trespassing to name the obvious ones not counting the treats of arson, violence, etc.) are seen as the victims and we have out of control leftists seek to prosecute (or persecute) those legally defending their lives and property?


https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/lo...ef=exit-recirc


https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/st...-was-my-rifle/

[tbone2u]

The mother fuckers broke through the security gate to get into the subdivision. Peaceful protesters my ass.
I'm glad I'm old

[tbone2u]

I think we know who soldier boy is now

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by USAsoldier

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hmmm... wonder why you left out the rest of the TX Codes of Criminal Procedures

Bandwidth ... thanks for sharing it all .... there is more!

Glad you have finally found the DUTIES OF PEACE OFFICERS IN TEXAS.

Remember?

Those "duties" you claimed were barred by the U.S. Constitution!

Like "to preserve the peace" ....

So, the officer is standing there and someone is getting assaulted does the officer have a "DUTY" to interfere and stop the assault ... aka "to preserve the peace" of the victim?

Or are your lazy-ass friends and family who are "LE officers" afraid to stop assaults?

You not only can't read court opinions you are deeply ignorant of Texas law.

Is that because you're an internet lawyer like you're an internet "soldier"?

Still stuck on stupid are you? Still don't have a SCOTUS opinion re: "risk life"!!!

Are You and yours afraid to "risk" your "life" as part of your "DUTY"? I see!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by O'Mike

Discusting follow up to the couple in St.Louis who I posted about earlier defending their property from BLM.

They may be prosecuted.

That's when there should be no prosecutorial immunity.

But it looks like some of SoldierBoy's family and friends failed to preserve the peace!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by tbone2u

I think we know who soldier boy is now

Banned under another handle?

[tbone2u]

Yes