the riots and violence

[TryWeakly]

...or 'clips' ...

[O'Mike]

Liberals reaping what they sow.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/24/u...e=articleShare


The last portion of that article really shows how the left has corrupted portions of our society.

Mitchell Erickson called the police after two black teenagers (with a gun pointed at him) cornered him near his home and demanded his car keys. He regrets the move. “I put those boys in danger of death by calling the cops,” he said.

.

[Russ38]

I read that story earlier today about the teenagers pulling a gun on him in the linck below......his response after the fact was sickening.....Regardless of their age ....I would have emptied a magazine in both those little bastards if threatened like that.....they’d need a mop and bucket to clean that shit up......

https://www.foxnews.com/us/minneapol...1-george-floyd

[tbone2u]

Your not alone Russ....and I would sleep just fine

[Russ38]

Like a baby......

[Alyssa XOXO]

Thanks for the updates gents, your shit is waaaaaay more entertaining than reading the news I'm sorry everyone's fun is getting shut down again due to Covid. Blame it on the Masses that acted like Asses with the Crowded Gatherings thinking they were seriously making a difference.

Stay Well and Happy Hobbying, have a good night!

[Russ38]

Originally Posted by Alyssa XOXO

Blame it on the Masses that acted like Asses with the Crowded Gatherings thinking they were seriously making a difference.

^^^^ True AF......

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by USAsoldier

C'mon sir, Google works the same for me as it should for you.

I was referring to Houston ISD. And it absolutely concerns me seeing as I'm a taxpayer for all things Houston and Harris County.

If you can't provide the cite then you've got nothing, so don't push your bs without backup. As for HISD ....

...adequately trained and equipped it is better for the school district to have it's own team for a faster response to a live shooter situation with specifically better intel on conditions and locations inside or outside for that matter the school buildings .... with the district team coordinating with staff to evacuate students and personnel more efficiently.

I wouldn't say more or be more specific than that. I'm sure you pay a lot of school taxes and consequently be able to throw a lot of weight at the school board meetings with your expertise.

So far the first responders have had little success in stopping an active shooting situation before unacceptable casualties. It takes too long for an outside special tactical team to get oriented and set up.

Good luck!

[Alyssa XOXO]

HISD SUCKS. I would never send my kids there. If you choose to raise your kids in Harris County, put their asses in Private School. Every parent knows the zoning when choosing their residence. It's Cause and Effect. You get what you pay for. And always use a Realtor. I have always been very specific when choosing a home.

[USAsoldier]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

If you can't provide the cite then you've got nothing, so don't push your bs without backup. As for HISD ....

...adequately trained and equipped it is better for the school district to have it's own team for a faster response to a live shooter situation with specifically better intel on conditions and locations inside or outside for that matter the school buildings .... with the district team coordinating with staff to evacuate students and personnel more efficiently.

I wouldn't say more or be more specific than that. I'm sure you pay a lot of school taxes and consequently be able to throw a lot of weight at the school board meetings with your expertise.

So far the first responders have had little success in stopping an active shooting situation before unacceptable casualties. It takes too long for an outside special tactical team to get oriented and set up.

Good luck!

Sir, we both know you looked it up and found what I stated to be true.

Here you go, I don't mind educating you again-

https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/p...o-protect.html

NYT, WASHINGTON, June 27, 2005
The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm...

Told ya!

[Russ38]

Heh....

[O'Mike]

USAsoldier is right in that regard, however the founders of this great nation (or our creator, as they envisioned it,) gave us a second amendment that allows us to protect ourselves from the dregs of society. Now leftist fucksticks like mike bloomberg and his band of merry communists think it's a 'loophole'. https://everytownresearch.org/covid-armed-protests/


Fortunately we live in a State, while not as good as others in this regard, still has citizens and not subjects. Unlike those democrat garden of edens that try and control their minions with stricter controls on how they can protect their precious asses, or not at all. The racist policies of the democrats since the 60's have proven to be a total failure of their thought process.............no shit, right?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by O'Mike

USAsoldier is right in that regard, ...

You mean he's right that's what the New York Times printed? In 2005~!



The opinions (and two are mentioned) said NOTHING about "risking lives"! That's what he posted!

And OM ... I really have to ask ... Do you honestly believe anyone would file a suit based on the FACT that an officer didn't "risk his life" to save them ... and take it all the way to the SCTOUS? "USA" reveals how extraordinarily ignorant he is ... while struggling to look bright.

"USA soldier" is like so many other bloviating posters he has to change the facts in an attempt to demonstrate he was correct .... also like ...

HISD having a "swat" team .... and he leaps to a rocket launcher in California!!!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by USAsoldier

The US Supreme Court has ruled law enforcement officers are not required to risk their lives for anyone.

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Please cite the case & SCOTUS # for that holding.

Originally Posted by LexusLover

If you can't provide the cite then you've got nothing, so don't push your bs without backup.

Originally Posted by USAsoldier

Sir, we both know you looked it up and found what I stated to be true.

Here you go, I don't mind educating you again-

https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/p...o-protect.html

NYT, WASHINGTON, June 27, 2005
The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm...

Told ya!

You're a legend in your own mind!

So where is this supreme court case that says ...

.."law enforcement officers are not required to risk their lives for anyone."

Just admit your full of it and move on!

Now where is the SCOTUS case that said what you posted?

And please quit changing the facts to avoid the inevitable.

[tbone2u]

[/QUOTE]
And please quit changing the facts to avoid the inevitable.[/QUOTE]

He can't do that LL.....if he could he wouldn't be a lib

Any over and under on the death count in Chicago this weekend?
We still have Sunday to go