No Stars and Bars but a Rainbow Flag Would Be Just Dandy

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

IBIdiot, look at the bright side. You got your ass handed to you, but you're still in possession of it. Think about how much blissful pleasure you can have with your own ass...

You'd be the incontinent ass here, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Wrong again, you freelance faggot from Obama's hometown of Chicago.

"The Reconquista ("reconquest")[a] is a period of approximately 781 years in the history of the Iberian Peninsula, after the Islamic conquest in 711 to the fall of Granada, the last Islamic state on the peninsula, in 1492"

The Reconquista and the Crusades are separate entities in the annals of history. Modern Medieval scholars can all get together and suck your dick for all I care. Won't change anything. The reconquista was a battle for the Iberian Peninsula.

"During the latter part of the Reconquista it was considered a holy war similar to the Crusades."

Similar to, but not the, Crusades. This isn't a typo. You're just fucking wrong. No one regards them as the same thing outside of some liberal college fucking campus shitstain.

Told you that your elementary school kiddy text doesn't count as a scholarly source, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. And what does your stupid-ass post? Your source, www.ducksters.com Middle Ages for Kids: Reconquista and Islam in Spain, is a fuckin' children's educational site, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. Modern scholarship trumps your fifth grade kiddy lesson, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas:

The argument is clear: the precedent of crusade as a religious war can be found in the Spanish Reconquest (notably at Barbastro, 1063). The concept was then elaborated by the Papacy for the first and second crusades, when the attack on Islam was envisaged as a double offensive on both sides of the Mediterranean. When the crusades to the Holy Land became less frequent, Spanish crusades were at their apogee, the subject of bulls from several popes, and concentrating the efforts of native and foreign fighters. During all this period, the indulgences granted to the 'fighting pilgrims' were the same as those granted to those going to the Holy Land. Pilgrimage to Santiago was very closely linked to crusade in Spain, and to the ideology of pilgrimage/crusade to the Holy Land. The papacy always tried to keep Spanish knights preoccupied with engagements in their own territory, while offering the Church and faithful the possibility to finance crusading endeavours throughout the eastern and western territories.

In this part of the work, the author uses papal bulls extensively to demonstrate that those issued for the Holy Land were very similar in their clauses to those issued for war against Muslims in the Iberian Peninsula. He relies heavily on the pioneering work by José Goñi Gaztambide, Historia de la bula de cruzada en España, (Vitoria: Editorial del Seminario, 1958), which is rounded out with references to other primary sources... The stress is always placed on the fact that the papacy transformed the Reconquest into a crusade. (Institute of Historical Research: London))

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Told you that your elementary school kiddy text doesn't count as a scholarly source, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. And what does your stupid-ass post? Your source, www.ducksters.com Middle Ages for Kids: Reconquista and Islam in Spain, is a fuckin' children's educational site, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. Modern scholarship trumps your fifth grade kiddy lesson, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas:

Hahahahaha....... the freelance faggot displays his impressive scholarship skills!

Now we know why he never provides links - his quotes are always from his kiddy book sources!

Fucking hysterical!




.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You'd be the incontinent ass here, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.




Told you that your elementary school kiddy text doesn't count as a scholarly source, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. And what does your stupid-ass post? Your source, www.ducksters.com Middle Ages for Kids: Reconquista and Islam in Spain, is a fuckin' children's educational site, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. Modern scholarship trumps your fifth grade kiddy lesson, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas:

What do you quote? A fucking opinion from some scholar, when it's widely recognized the Crusades began in the late 11th century and ended in 1272, by most all scholarly opinion. You go out and find the one lunatic who is willing to posit the Iberian campaign as part of the Crusades and you ride that horse till it's fucking dead. Eat a dick.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Hahahahaha....... the freelance faggot displays his impressive scholarship skills!

Now we know why he never provides links - his quotes are always from his kiddy book sources!

Fucking hysterical!




.

Doesn't change the fact that the Crusades ended in 1272. One scholar's opinion doesn't change the facts of history, shitstain.

You think I didn't know what the source was when I posted it? I'm the one that fucking googled it, turd burglar.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

IBIdiot, look at the bright side. You got your ass handed to you, but you're still in possession of it. Think about how much blissful pleasure you can have with your own ass...

He can't decide whether he likes it better gobbling cock or being a cock gobblin

[WombRaider]

History.com (ended in 1291)

http://www.history.com/topics/crusades


Here's another

"When were the crusades? The first crusade was launched by Pope Urban II at the Council of Clermont in 1095. There is controversy over the last crusade. “Traditionalists” would end the crusades in 1291 with the fall of the last crusader castle of the Latin Kingdom, the city of Acre (on the northern coast of present-day Israel). “Pluralists” disagree, but one good candidate would be the Spanish Armada of 1588."

There are several schools of thought and yours is the outlier. You have a pluralist view, similar to your view on men, the more the better lol.

http://usna.edu/Users/history/abels/...s_timeline.htm

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

You think I didn't know what the source was when I posted it? I'm the one that fucking googled it, turd burglar.

Wow, you mean Google now has a special kiddy search engine for people like you whose intellectual development was arrested in 5th grade?

That is sooo cool!

Link, please?

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Wow, you mean Google now has a special kiddy search engine for people like you whose intellectual development was arrested in 5th grade?

That is sooo cool!

Link, please?

Good Morning, Shitstain.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

History.com (ended in 1291)

http://www.history.com/topics/crusades


Here's another

"When were the crusades? The first crusade was launched by Pope Urban II at the Council of Clermont in 1095. There is controversy over the last crusade. “Traditionalists” would end the crusades in 1291 with the fall of the last crusader castle of the Latin Kingdom, the city of Acre (on the northern coast of present-day Israel). “Pluralists” disagree, but one good candidate would be the Spanish Armada of 1588."

There are several schools of thought and yours is the outlier. You have a pluralist view, similar to your view on men, the more the better lol.

http://usna.edu/Users/history/abels/...s_timeline.htm

Note the highlighted portion in your own post, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, and the University of London site cited above trumps your History channel source, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas; plus, this is from your second cited source:

"...crusades were fought not only in Syria, Palestine, and Egypt, but in Spain, the Baltic (Latvia and Prussia), Italy, Sicily, and southern France."

Originally Posted by WombRaider

He can't decide whether he likes it better gobbling cock or being a cock gobblin

"Cock gobbling" is your professed avocation, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Note the highlighted portion in your own post, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, and the University of London site cited above trumps your History channel source, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas; plus, this is from your second cited source:




"Cock gobbling" is your professed avocation, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

The source clearly advocates for a disagreement on when they ended, with most historians and scholars agreeing it was in the late 13th century. You are, once again, on the outside looking in. You've chosen a largely indefensible position and cited ONE book as your proof. Fuck off, dickwad.

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Here's how to pander to the LGBT crowd. Tomorrow our Panderer-in-Chief will don a rainbow colored thong.

Just the thought of having odummer donning a thong has got get woomby and shammy all hot and bothered ! They might just offer a "half price" sale on all their "services" out of joy that their hero is "down wit' dem" . They might even finally wash theirs this time before they put them on, thinking that they want to be "presentable" to their lying liberal, fag loving hero !

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

The source clearly advocates for a disagreement on when they ended, with most historians and scholars agreeing it was in the late 13th century. You are, once again, on the outside looking in. You've chosen a largely indefensible position and cited ONE book as your proof. Fuck off, dickwad.

There was more than "one source" cited, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas; plus, there's your own cited source that repudiates your other, cited fifth-grade kiddie site, you dick-coddling cock-gobbler.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

There was more than "one source" cited, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas; plus, there's your own cited source that repudiates your other, cited fifth-grade kiddie site, you dick-coddling cock-gobbler.

What kind of website is that IBPervert?

Are you walking the (forbidden topic) line again, or are you going to make up some more lies to try and backpedal from your own disgusting and despicable behavior?

BTW -- nice grammar! You're a disappointment to every GED dropout on this board!

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

What kind of website is that IBPervert?

Are you walking the (forbidden topic) line again, or are you going to make up some more lies to try and backpedal from your own disgusting and despicable behavior?

BTW -- nice grammar! You're a disappointment to every GED dropout on this board!

What are you whining about now, dipshit? If you're so interested in the website, why don't you ask the freelance faggot from Arkansas? He's the one using it for his libtard research. We're all extremely impressed by the depth of his scholarship. You should try it since you like kiddy sites so much. This one even lets you handicap yourself by education level, so you can click on "3rd grade" and not feel intimidated by big words. I did some browsing for you and discovered this new "fun fact" about Obama:

"While living in Indonesia he got to eat some interesting items including grasshoppers and snake meat. Yum!"

The snake in the White House eats snakes! Who woulda thunk it?

Enjoy!

www.ducksters.com

.