Quid Pro Quo took place for sure, now what?

[oeb11]

RH- so very true - it is how the DPST's dehumanize anyone who disagrees

They are preparing for their national socialist ovens after taking over.
They plan to make Hitler look like an amateur.

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

trump committed perjury in his written answers to Mueller investigation. The Stone conviction will support those allegations.

trump released a summary not a transcript, the transcript was moved to a secret server shortly after the perfect call.

Time for what’s left of the GOP to step up or suffer the consequences of 2020.

Talk about a Conspiracy theory, lol.

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

Talk about a Conspiracy theory, lol.

You wanna talk conspiracy theories....

The Russian investigation is a Hoax...proven to be a lie

Obama spied on trump’s 2016 campaign... proof of that lie is coming

Crowdstrike... conspiracy the 2016 election was hacked by the Ukraine and Not Russia....goddamn lie

Joe Biden committed extortion to protect his son...another fucking lie.

and you imply I’m a conspiracy theorist, bullshit, your leader is the fucking liar.

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

You wanna talk conspiracy theories....

The Russian investigation is a Hoax...proven to be a lie

Obama spied on trump’s 2016 campaign... proof of that lie is coming

Crowdstrike... conspiracy the 2016 election was hacked by the Ukraine and Not Russia....goddamn lie

Joe Biden committed extortion to protect his son...another fucking lie.

and you imply I’m a conspiracy theorist, bullshit, your leader is the fucking liar.

Hahahaha, Those are just words you've heard from the Liberal media. So you're just throwing them together in an attempt to make your self look intelligent. You have no common sense, nor do you know what you are even talking about. The worse scenario for Trump is he gets impeached by the House and the Senate shoves it back up the Democrat's ass and Trump is reelected in 2020. That's it,that's all it can be in this political charade that you dumb ass liberals have taken so seriously.

[oeb11]

Succinctly put. L-17!

[rexdutchman]

4 more ,just look at Nanceysss ,meltdown over questions they know is nothing burger,,

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

You wanna talk conspiracy theories....

The Russian investigation is a Hoax...proven to be a lie

Obama spied on trump’s 2016 campaign... proof of that lie is coming

Crowdstrike... conspiracy the 2016 election was hacked by the Ukraine and Not Russia....goddamn lie

Joe Biden committed extortion to protect his son...another fucking lie.

and you imply I’m a conspiracy theorist, bullshit, your leader is the fucking liar.

you're a conspiracy theorist extraordinaire!!!!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Revenant

Are you still alive? For fucks sake.

I thought (hoped) you would be dead by now.

You'd be the brain-dead jackass for imagining you can 'think'.

[gnadfly]

Where's the quid pro quo charge? Where's the bribery charge?

It took place - fer sure! - WDF

[rexdutchman]

Still waiting for the Quid or Pro Quo or really anything other then Political hatred

[Revenant]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You'd be the brain-dead jackass for imagining you can 'think'.

You have over 30K posts. Jesus fucking Christ. You have absolutely no existence outside this board, now do you?

Look up “loser” in the dictionary - it’s got your picture.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Revenant

You have over 30K posts. Jesus fucking Christ. You have absolutely no existence outside this board, now do you?

Look up “loser” in the dictionary - it’s got your picture.

Long ago it was revealed you are the "loser". You had to change your handle in order to hide from your previous ignorant posts. But alas, your ignorance as a loser is manifest in your new board persona as well.

[rexdutchman]

And Still no answer , still NO Quid or Pro
3 questions the LSM has forgot about ?
1) IF there was a Quid pro quo was that illegal ?
2) Why are all the "witnesses " (3 hand opinions) disgruntled employees or fired ?
3) Hunters dealings ?
That's the whole base of the investigation
Funny how simple question are to difficult for the Distortion of fact fairy tales , Opinions "he shouldn't because I say ?????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????? ??????????????????

[gnadfly]

Yep, like many other WDF's legal predictions, this came up a loser - like WDF.

And the LSM doesn't care one bit that the allegation that started this whole sham isn't included. In fact, some outlets are characterizing the Dims omission as "brilliant". No Shit! That by narrowing the scope it somehow enlargens the scope.

Simply psychotic.

[nevergaveitathought]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

Yep, like many other WDF's legal predictions, this came up a loser - like WDF.

And the LSM doesn't care one bit that the allegation that started this whole sham isn't included. In fact, some outlets are characterizing the Dims omission as "brilliant". No Shit! That by narrowing the scope it somehow enlargens the scope.

Simply psychotic.

+1