Women for Trump

[IMGTH58]

Let's see...now we're selling presidential pardons for campaign contributions....that's draining the swamp.

[chizzy]

[QUOTE=IMGTH58;1062283243]Let's see...now we're selling presidential pardons for campaign contributions....that's draining the swamp.[/QU


]if u would have done more than listen to cnn, you would have known the doj stated that noone in the current admin is under investigation

[1pittsburgh]

Originally Posted by bambino

Didn’t he call blacks predators? Didn’t he align himself with Robert Byrd and the segregationists vote down school choice? Didn’t he say “ I don’t want my kids to grow in a racial jungle”? Yes he did! And so much more!!!!!! If I were black, I wouldn’t for that reprobate.

Someone said that stuff on the campaign trail in 2016 or 2020? That's a rhetorical question, of course. Neither Clinton nor Biden sent out the dog whistles during their recent campaigns, pandering to the David Duke types, like Trump did.

[1pittsburgh]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Wow, people are still dumb enough (or are just intellectually lazy) to believe that “very fine people” and “they’re rapists” horseshit.

Yea, specifically how was what I said inaccurate?

[tannana]

Show of hands, Trumpettes--who is still on team kracken? Who still believes?

[1pittsburgh]

Even Barr basically said that Trump is full of shit with his "widespread election fraud" BS, but clowns are still hanging on the every word of an obvious con man.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by tannana

Show of hands, Trumpettes--who is still on team kracken? Who still believes?

Do you still believe Trump inherited $250 million from his father in 1974? When his father actually died in 1999?


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Trump

Read the wealth and death section carefully. It blows your theory of DJT inheriting $250 million in the 70’s out of the water. Run along now Mr Compounded Interest guru.

[1pittsburgh]

Originally Posted by bambino

Do you still believe Trump inherited $250 million from his father in 1974? When his father actually died in 1999?


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Trump

Read the wealth and death section carefully. It blows your theory of DJT inheriting $250 million in the 70’s out of the water. Run along now Mr Compounded Interest guru.

Do you still believe that he built his "empire"off of a million dollar loan, even though be became the president of his fathers organization in the early 1970s?

[bambino]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

Do you still believe that he built his "empire"off of a million dollar loan, even though be became the president of his fathers organization in the early 1970s?

I knew he became President of Trump Org in the 70’s. His father still owned the business. But his father objected to his son entering the Manhattan market. He did anyways and built a global enterprise from there. If he listened to his father, he would have stayed in Queens. So it’s you that doesn’t understand what DJT accomplished. That’s all the time I’ll waste with you.

[jmichael]

What I don't understand is, if the DNC or the left or the Kabel, was powerful and smart enough to pull a multistate conspiracy, to commit voter fraud, as alleged, by the loser in denial, then why did they stop at just him? why didn't they insure there would be a democratic majority in the senate?

[Jacuzzme]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

Yea, specifically how was what I said inaccurate?

I don’t think I have ever seen someone who has slayed a dragon.

≠

I slayed a dragon.

Unless, of course, you’re trying to convince yourself of a preconceived notion, which you clearly are. Go watch the statements in context, and figure out the difference between “they’re” and “their” while you’re at it.

[Dreamgurrl]

Originally Posted by jmichael

What I don't understand is, if the DNC or the left or the Kabel, was powerful and smart enough to pull a multistate conspiracy, to commit voter fraud, as alleged, by the loser in denial, then why did they stop at just him? why didn't they insure there would be a democratic majority in the senate?

Good luck getting any sort of logical explanation here. Lol!

[Charley3]

Do you remember that time two opposing political views butted heads on social media and the one guy goes “hey you know what, I am wrong and you are right!”??
Me neither. Lol

[bambino]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

I don’t think I have ever seen someone who has slayed a dragon.

≠

I slayed a dragon.

Unless, of course, you’re trying to convince yourself of a preconceived notion, which you clearly are. Go watch the statements in context, and figure out the difference between “they’re” and “their” while you’re at it.

Well, when your down 100s of thousands of votes, you only have time to fraudulently fill out the ballot for one candidate. The cheating took place in 6 cities controlled by Democrats. Atlanta, Philly, Pgh, Detroit, Milwaukee, Las Vegas and Phoenix. Philly can build a jail to house election crooks alone over the years. Plus Dominion and the software could change the algorithms. 1.5 for Biden. .75 for Trump. You don’t need to include the down ballot. That’s why some of the counts didn’t comeback as whole numbers but fractions. That’s impossible. I could go on. But think about this. Biden only won 17% of the counties in the US. Obama won 300 more counties than Biden but Biden got 13 million more vote. Maybe you can explain that. Biden was polling at 30% enthusiasm from Democrats. He rarely campaigned. When he did, few people showed up and he usually made a fool out of himself. Trump was getting 60,000 at rallies. So, nothing really adds up. But if a frail, senile, corrupt politician flairs your boat, it’s your choice.

An example of fraudulent votes in Georgia:

https://api.parler.com/l/7cXqB

Quoted the wrong guy. This post was for JMicheal

But in essence he answered his own question. If Biden supposedly won by a landslide, the downstream ticket would have too. That didn’t happen. Republicans beat all expectations, but Trump supposedly lost. That doesn’t happen.

[eyecu2]

My question is did the suggested fraud happen on the entire ticket, or just the presidency? If it's systemic, then a cry of foul from all GOP elected candidates would be in order. The GOP gained 8 seats right? So those should be all nullified too? It seems odd to manipulate a system where you win a presidency but lose seats in the Congress. Don'tcha think? Statistics are not a proof of fraud alone. You need some proof beyond allegations.