Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 278
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70793
biomed163227
Yssup Rider60924
gman4453294
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48646
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42574
CryptKicker37215
The_Waco_Kid36989
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-26-2015, 03:50 PM   #196
WombRaider
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
Encounters: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Oh my, how clever you are, undercunt. In my haste to list the many things you suck at, I inadvertently left out the word "at" in front of "reading comprehension". Nice catch! Damn, you really made me look stupid there. Almost as stupid as your saying "we're not talking about the past - we're talking about 2003!" Almost as stupid as your saying no means yes on the Korea question. Almost as stupid as... aw, forget it, everyone already knows how stupid you are!
This was in reference to you trying to take it back to Ike, which is most definitely the past. We weren't talking about the past. We were talking about 2003. 2003 comes after 1953. Get it now, dickless? You have no substance, so this is what you're reduced to. The incoherent ramblings of an unhinged, chicken-dick mind. Is that you IB?
WombRaider is offline   Quote
Old 05-26-2015, 03:55 PM   #197
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

LustingForCocks maybe you can tell the GOP field to put "Korean War or Bust" as their campaign slogan. Likely seal up the 80 plus crowd for the GOP for as long as they live!
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 05-27-2015, 07:18 AM   #198
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider View Post
The Council on Foreign Relations is in the tank for conservatives. Nice try, dickcheese. You give me some opinion piece and try to pass it off as fact. You're full of shit as usual. Bush negotiated the withdrawal. It's only fair, seeing as how he pulled us into that shitty war.
Typical libtard response, try to condemn the messenger instead of addressing the argument. If it is only "an opinion" piece then you should have no problem rebutting everything in it. By the way, Bush did not negoiate the withdrawal and everyone knows that. Obama even took credit for it.
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 05-27-2015, 08:50 AM   #199
Old-T
Valued Poster
 
Old-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 20, 2010
Location: From hotel to hotel
Posts: 9,058
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
I'm surprised you missed the point. Bush/Cheney/Rice will not be back in power ever again. It's in the history books so the question is moot. On the other hand, Hillary wants to be the president in the future and Obama is the president now. The question is still important for them to answer.
So BCR get a pass? I don't think so.

And more importantly if we don't honestly reflect and learn, then as a country we will repeat (can you say Viet Nam)

Finally, I still occasionally see people on here, and elsewhere, advocating what a wonderful president C. Rice the ultimate ivory tower thinker would make. Or another in the Bush dynasty--isn't that guy from Florida around here some place?
Old-T is offline   Quote
Old 05-27-2015, 09:08 AM   #200
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
By the way, Bush did not negoiate the withdrawal and everyone knows that.
His Admin did. He signed it. He argued for a free democratic Iraq. He got it and they promptly kicked us out. So much for nation building!
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 05-27-2015, 09:14 AM   #201
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

I'm thinking that we need a warrior for our next president. Someone who knows how things work and has the resolve to follow through. Besides James Webb, there is Allen West, Tammy Duckworth, Joni Ernst, Tom Cotton, Duncan Hunter Jr., or Tulsi Gabbi.
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 05-27-2015, 10:08 AM   #202
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

How about The Rock?
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 05-27-2015, 10:23 AM   #203
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
I'm thinking that we need a warrior for our next president. Someone who knows how things work and has the resolve to follow through. Besides James Webb, there is Allen West, Tammy Duckworth, Joni Ernst, Tom Cotton, Duncan Hunter Jr., or Tulsi Gabbi.
You mean to send a quarter of million men back again and completely wipe out these "terrorists," right?
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 05-27-2015, 11:39 AM   #204
WombRaider
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
Encounters: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
I'm thinking that we need a warrior for our next president. Someone who knows how things work and has the resolve to follow through. Besides James Webb, there is Allen West, Tammy Duckworth, Joni Ernst, Tom Cotton, Duncan Hunter Jr., or Tulsi Gabbi.
Jesus Christ. You're fucking nuts. More money burned up and more lives lost. That's enlightened thinking...
WombRaider is offline   Quote
Old 05-27-2015, 11:39 AM   #205
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,648
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
Typical libtard response, try to condemn the messenger instead of addressing the argument. If it is only "an opinion" piece then you should have no problem rebutting everything in it.
+1


Yep, yep, yep.... The idiot shows that he never bothers to read or acquaint himself with intelligent foreign policy analysis. He doesn't have a fucking clue who the Council on Foreign Relations is. He probably thinks Susan Rice and Condoleezza Rice share the same views because they share the same surname. Since he has no integrity (or ability to evaluate foreign policy in an objective, non-partisan fashion), he assumes everyone else must lack integrity too.

The Council on Foreign Relations is non-partisan. It disseminates foreign policy opinions across the spectrum. That's a fact. It is confirmed by numerous groups such as CitizenSource (see link) that track the political leanings and affiliations of think tanks. Only a desperate ignoramus would try to impugn the integrity of the Council on Foreign Relations by claiming they are “in the tank” with conservatives or anyone else. The Council's Board of Directors includes Robert Rubin, Madeleine Albright, and Fareed Zakaria – what a bunch of right-wing zealots!

Once again, undercunt has his ass handed to him.

http://www.citizensource.com/Opinion...ThinkTanks.htm


.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 05-27-2015, 11:52 AM   #206
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,648
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider View Post
You're illiteracy is rearing its ugly head again.

I'm not a grammar Nazi, but by golly this one is a gem!


lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 05-27-2015, 12:15 PM   #207
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,648
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider View Post
We weren't talking about the past. We were talking about 2003. 2003 comes after 1953. Get it now, dickless?

No. But keep on rambling like an idiot. Every shovel you lift only digs you deeper into the hole.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 05-27-2015, 12:18 PM   #208
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
I'm not a grammar Nazi, but by golly this one is a gem!


Nothing stopping you from flying to Iraq and signing up to fight ISIS take JD with ya!
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 05-27-2015, 01:33 PM   #209
Old-T
Valued Poster
 
Old-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 20, 2010
Location: From hotel to hotel
Posts: 9,058
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
I'm thinking that we need a warrior for our next president. Someone who knows how things work and has the resolve to follow through. Besides James Webb, there is Allen West, Tammy Duckworth, Joni Ernst, Tom Cotton, Duncan Hunter Jr., or Tulsi Gabbi.
Those that have gone to war are in general very reluctant to do so again. They don't see it as a game--as Bush-2, C. Rice, Obama, and Pelosi all do/did. And if they DO go to war because they must, because other options have failed, then they treat it as the life and death horror it is. Not as a game. And they don't try to make soldiers into policemen or day care workers or grocery store clerks. Trouble is we (both parties) are loath to be honest about the TRUE cost of going to war so they lie to the masses, and lie to themselves as well.

War really is hell. A necessary last resort at times, but used far to often.

Those on here who have never been, go talk to people who survived WW-II, Korea, VN, or Afghanistan. See how many WANT to see that again (different from those who will do so if needed, not the same thing at all).

Some on here are far too willing to send others to die.
Old-T is offline   Quote
Old 05-27-2015, 07:47 PM   #210
cowboyinjungle
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 29, 2010
Location: North Coast
Posts: 116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old-T View Post
Those that have gone to war are in general very reluctant to do so again. They don't see it as a game--as Bush-2, C. Rice, Obama, and Pelosi all do/did. And if they DO go to war because they must, because other options have failed, then they treat it as the life and death horror it is. Not as a game. And they don't try to make soldiers into policemen or day care workers or grocery store clerks. Trouble is we (both parties) are loath to be honest about the TRUE cost of going to war so they lie to the masses, and lie to themselves as well.

War really is hell. A necessary last resort at times, but used far to often.

Those on here who have never been, go talk to people who survived WW-II, Korea, VN, or Afghanistan. See how many WANT to see that again (different from those who will do so if needed, not the same thing at all).

Some on here are far too willing to send others to die.
As always Old-T you are spot on.
cowboyinjungle is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved