Sandra Bland, what really happened?

[andymarksman]

It depends upon whether his audio communication with his supervisor can be legally construed as a "statement" under the Texas Penal Code....

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by andymarksman

It depends upon whether his audio communication with his supervisor can be legally construed as a "statement" under the Texas Penal Code....

What article of the Texas Penal Code?

I've never seen an indictment for violating "the Texas Penal Code"!

It appropriately requires specificity, ....

...... even for peace officers one desires to persecute.

[andymarksman]

The law enforcement officers know better, don't they?

http://forums.officer.com/t184913/

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by andymarksman

The law enforcement officers know better, don't they?

Know better than who?

99% of the time an LE officer makes a legal decision in seconds, if that long...

.... and typically make that decision in a high stress confrontational event.

Everyone else, like you, get to mull over it and find "links" for days...

... if not years!

And the "smartest" LE officers are the ones who weren't there in the fray.

...Just like the internet "pundits" like you, who takes hours/days to come up with "a law" the trooper violated....and still can't do it.

[andymarksman]

He knowingly and intentionally made a "legal decision," a decision defined by the law as a criminal offense. The DA, and ultimately the jury, will get to decide whether he ought to be held criminally accountable for that "decision."

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Know better than who?

99% of the time an LE officer makes a legal decision in seconds, if that long...

.... and typically make that decision in a high stress confrontational event.

Everyone else, like you, get to mull over it and find "links" for days...

... if not years!

And the "smartest" LE officers are the ones who weren't there in the fray.

...Just like the internet "pundits" like you, who takes hours/days to come up with "a law" the trooper violated....and still can't do it.

Originally Posted by andymarksman

He knowingly and intentionally made a "legal decision," a decision defined by the law as a criminal offense. The DA, and ultimately the jury, will get to decide whether he ought to be held criminally accountable for that "decision."

Andymarksman, don't pay any attention to LLIdiot!

He pretends to know anything and everything.

He looks down on everybody, even the tallest giraffe.

When LL is proven wrong, he will never admit it.

But he can "duck, dodge and deflect" with the best of 'em.

Speaking of which, LL you "still" have not answered the following question:

Knowing then what we know now, would you "still" support the Spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq?

As for me, the answer is "still" HELL NO!

LLIdiot, what about you?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by andymarksman

He knowingly and intentionally made a "legal decision," a decision defined by the law as a criminal offense.

You mean he violated the Texas Penal Code? What article in the Penal Code?

You are really struggling with that concept aren't you.

You accuse (and criticize) him for knowing the law and intentionally violating "the law" and you can't even point out "the law as a criminal offense" he violated!!!! And you are a fucking genius, right?

Andy ... you are full of shit. OK? You are just whining like you always do, and don't know shit about what you are posting about. You are as much a parrot as that goof-ball BigTits, who is the Cut and Paste Queen of Eccie.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by bigtex

Andymarksman, don't pay any attention to LLIdiot!

He pretends to know anything and everything.

He looks down on everybody, even the tallest giraffe.

When LL is proven wrong, he will never admit it.

But he can "duck, dodge and deflect" with the best of 'em.

Speaking of which, LL you "still" have not answered the following question:

Knowing then what we know now, would you "still" support the Spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq?

As for me, the answer is "still" HELL NO!

LLIdiot, what about you?

If LL loses the argument with one member, he takes it up with another.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

If LL loses the argument with one member, he takes it up with another.

You mean when you declare yourself to be the "winner" of an "argument"?

Have you now jumped on the ... 20-20 hindsight band wagon with Big Tits?

Andy is vying for honorable mention while blowing his own trumpet.

What you are blowing on the wagon?

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

You mean when you declare yourself to be the "winner" of an "argument"?

Have you now jumped on the ... 20-20 hindsight band wagon with Big Tits?

Andy is vying for honorable mention while blowing his own trumpet.

What you are blowing on the wagon?

"Blowing" !!!! well woomby can always use someone with some talented lips down at his 'holes franchises and the third shift at Talleywackers !

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

You mean when you declare yourself to be the "winner" of an "argument"?

Have you now jumped on the ... 20-20 hindsight band wagon with Big Tits?

Andy is vying for honorable mention while blowing his own trumpet.

What you are blowing on the wagon?

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

You did not ask me, but according to Steven McCraw,he did nor exhibit professionalism and courtesy during the entire contact. Plus when he reached into the car and grabbed her he violated lawful search & seizure.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

LittleEva, you are impressive in this thread. Best you've ever sounded. You are not the most stupid person on here. Sorry for saying that earlier.


+1

Dull knife did it for me............

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

"Blowing" !!!! well woomby can always use someone with some talented lips down at his 'holes franchises and the third shift at Talleywackers !

Give it up. It's so old at this point. I told you before, you're a grown man, have a little more respect for yourself. Goddamn. Of course, if you have to carry around a fucking drool rag, my bad, keep up the good work.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

You mean he violated the Texas Penal Code? What article in the Penal Code?

You are really struggling with that concept aren't you.

You accuse (and criticize) him for knowing the law and intentionally violating "the law" and you can't even point out "the law as a criminal offense" he violated!!!! And you are a fucking genius, right?

Andy ... you are full of shit. OK? You are just whining like you always do, and don't know shit about what you are posting about. You are as much a parrot as that goof-ball BigTits, who is the Cut and Paste Queen of Eccie.

Have you ever admitted any mistake? Like all the mistakes you've made in the blacks being killed by police. You just knew that guy had stolen the officer's taser. Which was bullshit. But you never came back and said, hey, I was wrong on that one. The mark of a real man is his ability to admit a mistake. You're almost a woman.

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Give it up. It's so old at this point. I told you before, you're a grown man, have a little more respect for yourself. Goddamn. Of course, if you have to carry around a fucking drool rag, my bad, keep up the good work.

So the TRUTH about YOUR life DOES hurt YOU , you lying liberal POS ! Keep throwing gas on this lit match woomby !! Just soak your own clothes in gas before you do so !!!

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

So the TRUTH about YOUR life DOES hurt YOU , you lying liberal POS ! Keep throwing gas on this lit match woomby !! Just soak your own clothes in gas before you do so !!!

I don't give a shit either way, but to know there's a grown man out there who is typing what you type, over and over again, is sad.