trump the traitor

[Cap'n Crunch]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Won't that be fascinating! Think about it! Reading intel transcripts of eavesdropped conversations of your political opponents discussing strategy... ain't this a great country???

HAHAHA! I'm waiting for you to quote your sources of OBAMA eavesdropped conversations of Trump discussing strategy, you weak, weak, dimwitted twat! LOL this is great, you double down on stupid and offer nothing but conspiracy theory.

You said "Obama" did this. Now you want to hide behind some other names. I knew you'd run and hide from your embarrassing post! You are too scared and too stupid to give a believable response.

If I was to give you any credit, I'd say you are sad like a clown; smile on the outside, but inside know that Trump is a real disaster. But you are too chromosome damaged to be in touch with reality.

Another day, another ass-whooping served up to lustyturd here in the beautiful City of Austin!

[Cap'n Crunch]

Dear lustyturd, the ass-whooped loser from deliverance country,

We have a Republican Congress and Republican Senate, and yet mostly what we hear about is Trump failures and Russia. Not much attention to your conspiracy theory. Sucks, doesn't it? Especially for someone like you, who's fantasy is sucking all the cum and lies from Trump’s tiny penis and brain. Your love and support for him is pretty freaky and more embarrassing with every passing day!

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Cap'n Crunch

LOL this is great, you double down on stupid and offer nothing but conspiracy theory.

Not at all, you worthless, stuttering, profane dim-retarded liar. I keep offering FACTS. You're the one fantasizing about collusion and peddling nothing but conspiracy theory. Did you already forget how you couldn't refute any of my FACTS the last time I force-fed them down your ignorant piehole?

FACTS

1. Trump associates and/or campaign officials were electronically surveilled prior to January 20, 2017.

2. This surveillance was carried out/compiled by US intelligence agencies working for the Obama administration.

3. Those US intelligence agencies sent reports summarizing the results of such eavesdropping to the Obama White House, where they were read by Susan Rice and others.

4. Such summaries were often written in a way making it easy to identify the Trump officials without unmasking them.

5. On multiple occasions, Susan Rice, John Brennan and Samantha Powers requested unmasking of the names of the Trump officials in those summaries.

6. It has been reported some of the requests for unmasking had nothing to do with Russia or ties between Russia and the Trump campaign.

7. It has also been reported that the intelligence provided to the Obama White House included information on meetings and policy discussions by Trump officials.


Who's getting his ass whooped now?

[lustylad]

And speaking of "too scared and too stupid to give a response"... how many times have you spinelessly ducked MY question? Is it 5 or 6? I'm losing count.

Originally Posted by lustylad

...try to imagine if Donald Trump were to use the same intelligence agencies in the same fashion to gather information on his political opponents. Would that be a problem?

[lustylad]

Hey crunchyass, did you study up on the meaning of ZERO-SUM and how it infects your sad, lib-retarded mental outlook?

Maybe this will help you overcome your disability:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-sum_thinking


You're welcome!

[gfejunkie]

Originally Posted by Cap'n Crunch

LMFAO!!!!! You quoted far right propaganda and Russian News!!!!! OMG! you are even more clueless than I had wildly imagined!

You really expect the leftist media to criticize one of their own? You are the clueless one. That's not the agenda. Not my fault you're incapable of critical thinking on your own. I'm not going to find you an acceptable anti-Trump, anti-Republican source every time you won't accept the truth. You can and will do that on your own. There's plenty of those. Truth is truth no matter who reports about it and the truth is the Washington Post and the New York Times lie. A lot.

Find your own sources. I'm tired of spoon feeding you.

In the end, the President will be vindicated. So, you can stay ignorant or go fuck yourself. I really don't give a shit.

[Observing]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Not at all, you worthless, stuttering, profane dim-retarded liar. I keep offering FACTS. You're the one fantasizing about collusion and peddling nothing but conspiracy theory. Did you already forget how you couldn't refute any of my FACTS the last time I force-fed them down your ignorant piehole?

FACTS

1. Trump associates and/or campaign officials were electronically surveilled prior to January 20, 2017.

2. This surveillance was carried out/compiled by US intelligence agencies working for the Obama administration.

3. Those US intelligence agencies sent reports summarizing the results of such eavesdropping to the Obama White House, where they were read by Susan Rice and others.

4. Such summaries were often written in a way making it easy to identify the Trump officials without unmasking them.

5. On multiple occasions, Susan Rice, John Brennan and Samantha Powers requested unmasking of the names of the Trump officials in those summaries.

6. It has been reported some of the requests for unmasking had nothing to do with Russia or ties between Russia and the Trump campaign.

7. It has also been reported that the intelligence provided to the Obama White House included information on meetings and policy discussions by Trump officials.


Who's getting his ass whooped now?

"7. It has also been reported that the intelligence provided to the Obama White House included information on meetings and policy discussions by Trump officials."
"Reported" by whom?
Breitbart or Infowars?



"Look past the president's conspiracy theories, though, and one fact stands out: However strongly Trump feels that he’s right, he’d better hope he’s wrong."
https://www.wired.com/2017/03/feds-w...t-obama-worry/

[gfejunkie]

Originally Posted by Observing

"Reported" by whom?
Breitbart or Infowars?

No. It was your beloved New York Times...



Now, they wouldn't lie, now would they?
I still have a hard copy of this issue so I know it's real.

[Observing]

Originally Posted by gfejunkie

You really expect the leftist media to criticize one of their own? You are the clueless one. That's not the agenda. Not my fault you're incapable of critical thinking on your own. I'm not going to find you an acceptable anti-Trump, anti-Republican source every time you won't accept the truth. You can and will do that on your own. There's plenty of those. Truth is truth no matter who reports about it and the truth is the Washington Post and the New York Times lie. A lot.

Find your own sources. I'm tired of spoon feeding you.

In the end, the President will be vindicated. So, you can stay ignorant or go fuck yourself. I really don't give a shit.

Mueller has hired 13 of the best lawyers in the land.Trump has hired a real-state lawyer who can't spell "president"
This is going to be like the Golden State Warriors vs a middle school basketball team.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/16/politi...ers/index.html

[Observing]

Originally Posted by gfejunkie

No. It was your beloved New York Times...



Now, they wouldn't lie, now would they?

"Look past the president's conspiracy theories, though, and one fact stands out: However strongly Trump feels that he’s right, he’d better hope he’s wrong."
https://www.wired.com/2017/03/feds-w...t-obama-worry/

[gfejunkie]

Originally Posted by Observing

Mueller has hired 13 of the best lawyers in the land.Trump has hired a real-state lawyer who can't spell "president"
This is going to be like the Golden State Warriors vs a middle school basketball team.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/16/politi...ers/index.html

Originally Posted by Observing

"Look past the president's conspiracy theories, though, and one fact stands out: However strongly Trump feels that he’s right, he’d better hope he’s wrong."
https://www.wired.com/2017/03/feds-w...t-obama-worry/

Originally Posted by gfejunkie

In the end, the President will be vindicated. So, you can stay ignorant or go fuck yourself. I really don't give a shit.

CNN and Wired, huh?

You left out the fact that I still have a hard copy of that issue. However conveniently.
They were in such a hurry to get that information out that day that they didn't stop to think of the impact it would have later on.

[Observing]

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump...ry?id=48082175

Yeah Donnie, try to keep up. Firing the guy in charge of investigating you, then telling the whole world you did it to stop the investigation leads to an obstruction of justice probe.
Our President, every day, confirms the supposition that's he's a complete and utter moron.

[Cap'n Crunch]

Originally Posted by gfejunkie

No. It was your beloved New York Times...



Now, they wouldn't lie, now would they?
I still have a hard copy of this issue so I know it's real.

YES! LEGAL wiretap data used to legally investigate possible ILLEGAL activity by Russians in contact with said Trump Aides! Hmm, why were they speaking with the Russians?

Every time you post that headline, all it does is bring to the forefront legal activity used to uncover the scum associated with Donald Trump and everything he touches!

Thank you for reminding everyone how Trump and his associates are under criminal investigation!

Politifact rates these conspiracy theory assumptions as FALSE
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...pped-his-phon/

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Observing

"Reported" by whom?
Breitbart or Infowars?

https://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=105...&postcount=472

Originally Posted by Observing

"Look past the president's conspiracy theories, though, and one fact stands out: However strongly Trump feels that he’s right, he’d better hope he’s wrong."
https://www.wired.com/2017/03/feds-w...t-obama-worry/

Your link doesn't work.

Mueller had better hope he finds some underlying wrongdoing. "Obstruction of justice" is going nowhere on its own.

[Observing]

Originally Posted by lustylad

https://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=105...&postcount=472




Your link doesn't work.

Mueller had better hope he finds some underlying wrongdoing. "Obstruction of justice" is going nowhere on its own.

Link works fine.
I just clicked on it from your post and here it is again.
https://www.wired.com/2017/03/feds-w...t-obama-worry/
FYI-
Wiretaps can only be ordered by FISA courts...
Also by taking a look at the stellar team Mueller has assembled,"obstruction of justice" will be only one of the charges.
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/a-li...tigation-team/
Think RICO.
Trump's piss ant real estate lawyer is in wa-a-a-y over his head.
http://crooksandliars.com/2017/06/to...trump-wont-pay
I just love that his lifelong bullshit and stiffing others who worked for him is coming around to bite him in the ass.