Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
649 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Jon Bon |
399 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
Starscream66 |
282 |
You&Me |
281 |
George Spelvin |
270 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70822 | biomed1 | 63693 | Yssup Rider | 61265 | gman44 | 53360 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48817 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 43221 | The_Waco_Kid | 37409 | CryptKicker | 37231 | Mokoa | 36497 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
08-30-2015, 04:00 PM
|
#181
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly
They didn't try, they did. How did we find out? One way was they turned off the monitoring cameras. I don't believe it gets any BETTER than that.
Flighty wants the treaty passed to find out what's in it. But its meaningless anyway, the sanctions have been lifted thanks to Obama taking it to the UN and getting it approved. The "snap back" sanctions are a joke. Russia and Iran already are dealing for missile systems. Again, my guess is that one year from no major provisions of the treaty will be fulfilled on Iran's end.
|
How do you propose they could turn off our satellites, miles above the earth?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-30-2015, 04:46 PM
|
#182
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
North Korea has nukes!
|
And they constantly threaten us.
Here's the differences:
1) They don't have massive oil reserves that can give them a huge amount of hard cash
2) NK has China so that if NK used the nuclear weapon, China would be forced to act else it would cost them dearly financially
3) NK doesn't escalate other marginal nations to get a bomb, their neighboring countries either have a bomb or are allies with folks that would retaliate for them.
4) NK having the bomb doesn't put a $10 premium on each barrel of oil
There are many others. To accommodate your poor reading comprehension, I only listed four.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-30-2015, 05:05 PM
|
#183
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly
And they constantly threaten us.
Here's the differences:
1) They don't have massive oil reserves that can give them a huge amount of hard cash
2) NK has China so that if NK used the nuclear weapon, China would be forced to act else it would cost them dearly financially
3) NK doesn't escalate other marginal nations to get a bomb, their neighboring countries either have a bomb or are allies with folks that would retaliate for them.
4) NK having the bomb doesn't put a $10 premium on each barrel of oil
There are many others. To accommodate your poor reading comprehension, I only listed four.
|
As the deal with Iran has been going forward, the bottom has dropped out of oil. Iran will put even more oil on the market, a market which has a glut of oil as it is. Supply is up but demand is not there. Even you should be able to figure out that leads to lower prices, not higher ones.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-30-2015, 07:20 PM
|
#184
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 30, 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 8,050
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider
As the deal with Iran has been going forward, the bottom has dropped out of oil. Iran will put even more oil on the market, a market which has a glut of oil as it is. Supply is up but demand is not there. Even you should be able to figure out that leads to lower prices, not higher ones.
|
And yet, you claim to be long on oil?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-30-2015, 10:30 PM
|
#185
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSK
And yet, you claim to be long on oil?
|
And yet, you once claimed to be a Jewish Lawyer, aka JLIdiot.
And then you lost the bet!
Shortly afterwards you became a Jewish Welsher, aka DSKIdiot.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-30-2015, 10:39 PM
|
#186
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly
And they constantly threaten us.
Here's the differences:
1) They don't have massive oil reserves that can give them a huge amount of hard cash
2) NK has China so that if NK used the nuclear weapon, China would be forced to act else it would cost them dearly financially
3) NK doesn't escalate other marginal nations to get a bomb, their neighboring countries either have a bomb or are allies with folks that would retaliate for them.
4) NK having the bomb doesn't put a $10 premium on each barrel of oil
There are many others. To accommodate your poor reading comprehension, I only listed four.
|
Really , Iran is in North America, threatening us?
By threatening us do you mean that we do not have total control of their government like we did pre 1980? ....when they were our ally.
Right now stability in the region should be our goal. We have a common goal in that regard. The Iraq fuck up will take a long time to fix. This nation building Democracy in that region did not work, was never going to work and was Fool's Gold for you folks that still seem to think it was a good idea.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-30-2015, 11:07 PM
|
#187
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSK
And yet, you claim to be long on oil?
|
12 months. Lot can change in 12 months. If it doesn't, I'll lose some. That's the nature of the beast.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-30-2015, 11:07 PM
|
#188
|
AKA ULTRA MAGA Trump Gurl
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,409
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
Really , Iran is in North America, threatening us?
By threatening us do you mean that we do not have total control of their government like we did pre 1980? ....when they were our ally.
Right now stability in the region should be our goal. We have a common goal in that regard. The Iraq fuck up will take a long time to fix. This nation building Democracy in that region did not work, was never going to work and was Fool's Gold for you folks that still seem to think it was a good idea.
|
you dumbfuck. do you mean this guy?
deposed by this guy?
betrayed by this guy?
we should have backed the first guy. dumbfuck.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-30-2015, 11:31 PM
|
#189
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
Really , Iran is in North America, threatening us?
|
I was specifically referring to NK. I did not waste my time with the rest of your drivel based on your not comprehending what country referenced. Or it could simply be another one of your strawman attempts.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-30-2015, 11:45 PM
|
#190
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider
As the deal with Iran has been going forward, the bottom has dropped out of oil. Iran will put even more oil on the market, a market which has a glut of oil as it is. Supply is up but demand is not there. Even you should be able to figure out that leads to lower prices, not higher ones.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly
I was specifically referring to NK. I did not waste my time with the rest of your drivel based on your not comprehending what country referenced. Or it could simply be another one of your strawman attempts.
|
I'd like a response. Or did you not have one, since you fucked up?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-31-2015, 01:17 AM
|
#191
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,787
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider
You act as if we had a chance at getting a better deal and there's no evidence for that.
|
Has anyone ever seen a stupider comment than this? You could ALWAYS have gotten a better deal. Why do you think Trump is leading in the polls? Most people recognize the author of "The Art of the Deal" wouldn't have been taken to the cleaners the way Odumbo and Kerry were in their negotiations with Iran.
.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-31-2015, 01:38 AM
|
#192
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad
Has anyone ever seen a stupider comment than this? You could ALWAYS have gotten a better deal. Why do you think Trump is leading in the polls? Because most people recognize the author of "The Art of the Deal" wouldn't have been taken to the cleaners the way Odumbo and Kerry were in their negotiations with Iran.
.
|
Yeah, the one you just made. Firstly, you can't 'always' get a better deal. That's just an outright lie. At some point you've gotten the best deal you are going to get. And to think of Trump negotiating with Iran makes me fucking laugh. These are not real estate deals, dumbass. And to think they have anything in common is to be naive.
Trump is leading in the polls because of mouthbreathers like you. He gets you all tingly saying the shit you want to hear. Go load up his latest stump speech, grab the lube and have a great time.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-31-2015, 01:54 AM
|
#193
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
I don't oppose the deal. I oppose the lies about it. The only good thing about the deal is that it reduces the chances that we will go to war with Iran. That's good enough for me. And I don't care if they get a nuke. The only country in history to use a nuke other than in testing is the USA. Iran is only a threat because we keep poking at them. If we would cultivate trade instead of meddling, they'd be a very strong ally in the ME. But wars and rumors of wars is what keeps the cash flowing to the banks and Big Business. There is no profit in peace.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-31-2015, 02:02 AM
|
#194
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
I don't oppose the deal. I oppose the lies about it. The only good thing about the deal is that it reduces the chances that we will go to war with Iran. That's good enough for me. And I don't care if they get a nuke. The only country in history to use a nuke other than in testing is the USA. Iran is only a threat because we keep poking at them. If we would cultivate trade instead of meddling, they'd be a very strong ally in the ME. But wars and rumors of wars is what keeps the cash flowing to the banks and Big Business. There is no profit in peace.
|
What lies? The rest is spot on, we've meddled with Iran long enough. We would not take the poking that we give them, yet we expect them to like it and demand more.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
08-31-2015, 05:36 AM
|
#195
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Nov 15, 2012
Location: House
Posts: 1,295
|
This deal was put together and approved by the U.N. security council. It will move forward with or without U.S.A. approval. That is the purpose of the United Nations.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|