Barr should be disbarred!

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

if you think Sheptard Smith and Mike's punk son Chris are gonna lead some media driven movement that will show the nation Trump is guilty then you'll be very disappointed.

how many pages of the Mueller report have you read? point to one page of the public report that proves all the left wing bloviating about .. anything. Trump being guilty? Barr is lying about the report?


As they say in Missouri .. "Show me!"

Why is the trump regime so bent on no one seeing the underlying evidence of the report. Volume two mentions Mcgahn and his chief of staff Annie McDonald’s notes that were kept during meetings in the trump regime. I didn’t even know Annie McDonald made extensive daily notes until I read Volume 2.
Did you?

Simple solution, bring Mueller, Mcgahn, and McDonald for open hearings. I would think the Regime would welcome the opportunity to embarrass the Ds. That executive privilege he is claiming was waived by his attorney Ty Cobb so maybe he should sue his ass for agreeing. The majority of this country wants hearings because no one can believe the liar in chief.
What are you followers afraid of ?
I haven’t opened Volume one, it deals with the Russians systematically attacking the democracy of the US and collusion isn’t a crime, and conspiracy was not found beyond a reasonable doubt. The new game is obstruction. Ain’t it fun!

[eccieuser9500]

"I'm grappling with the word endeavors."





https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-1...sect-1510.html

(a) Whoever willfully endeavors by means of bribery to obstruct, delay, or prevent the communication of information relating to a violation of any criminal statute of the United States by any person to a criminal investigator shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Why is the trump regime so bent on no one seeing the underlying evidence of the report. Volume two mentions Mcgahn and his chief of staff Annie McDonald’s notes that were kept during meetings in the trump regime. I didn’t even know Annie McDonald made extensive daily notes until I read Volume 2.
Did you?

Simple solution, bring Mueller, Mcgahn, and McDonald for open hearings. I would think the Regime would welcome the opportunity to embarrass the Ds. That executive privilege he is claiming was waived by his attorney Ty Cobb so maybe he should sue his ass for agreeing. The majority of this country wants hearings because no one can believe the liar in chief.
What are you followers afraid of ?
I haven’t opened Volume one, it deals with the Russians systematically attacking the democracy of the US and collusion isn’t a crime, and conspiracy was not found beyond a reasonable doubt. The new game is obstruction. Ain’t it fun!

You do know that Trump could have claimed Executive Privilege as is his right to do so? He allowed full cooperation. Unlike Obama who covered up any and everything.



the new game is TREASON, COLLUSION and CONSPIRACY.










TRAITORS ONE AND ALL!



and them chickens be comin' home to roost. PERP WALK!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

[CENTER]"I'm grappling with the word endeavors."

"information relating to a violation of any criminal statute"

You really should be grappling with the truth to the matter: there was no "violation of a criminal statute" to serve as the basis for invoking the statute you are citing.

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Why is the trump regime so bent on no one seeing the underlying evidence of the report. Volume two mentions Mcgahn and his chief of staff Annie McDonald’s notes that were kept during meetings in the trump regime. I didn’t even know Annie McDonald made extensive daily notes until I read Volume 2.
Did you?

Simple solution, bring Mueller, Mcgahn, and McDonald for open hearings. I would think the Regime would welcome the opportunity to embarrass the Ds. That executive privilege he is claiming was waived by his attorney Ty Cobb so maybe he should sue his ass for agreeing. The majority of this country wants hearings because no one can believe the liar in chief.
What are you followers afraid of ?
I haven’t opened Volume one, it deals with the Russians systematically attacking the democracy of the US and collusion isn’t a crime, and conspiracy was not found beyond a reasonable doubt. The new game is obstruction. Ain’t it fun!

Right out of the lefty MSM narrative.

But in answer basically.

First off, legal rules and precedent prevent certain information from being released from the DOJ investigation.

Second, the House Dims won't go read even the less redacted version of the report, so why the need for specific "notes" that should be discussed in that report.

Third, it's in Trump's nature to piss off the Dims within his legal bounds, and this is priceless.

As Graham said, it's over.

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by eccielover

Right out of the lefty MSM narrative.

But in answer basically.

First off, legal rules and precedent prevent certain information from being released from the DOJ investigation.

Second, the House Dims won't go read even the less redacted version of the report, so why the need for specific "notes" that should be discussed in that report.

Third, it's in Trump's nature to piss off the Dims within his legal bounds, and this is priceless.

As Graham said, it's over.

First...precedent was made with Watergate regarding accessibility to evidence and rules are made to be changed

Second... the Russian sympathizers haven’t read it either and the notes are documented evidence of possible obstruction. That’s for the Congress to investigate.

Third...trump’s nature sure appears to be denying the Russians attacked the election period. If he’s not being the private server of Putin he’s writing love letters to Kim

The same Graham who referred to trump as a idiot, con man, kook and recently wrote to Mueller about testifying in the Senate. A day after the “it’s over” statement. Lindsey Graham is a perfect example of what happens to a dummy after the ventriloquist dies.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

First...precedent was made with Watergate regarding accessibility to evidence and rules are made to be changed

Second... the Russian sympathizers haven’t read it either and the notes are documented evidence of possible obstruction. That’s for the Congress to investigate.

Third...trump’s nature sure appears to be denying the Russians attacked the election period. If he’s not being the private server of Putin he’s writing love letters to Kim

The same Graham who referred to trump as a idiot, con man, kook and recently wrote to Mueller about testifying in the Senate. A day after the “it’s over” statement. Lindsey Graham is a perfect example of what happens to a dummy after the ventriloquist dies.

The "Russian sympathizers" would be Team hildebeest who sold hildebeest's "#Grubered" minions a line of Russian sourced bullshit for two solid years.

RE: the Mueller report -- there's only two fucking lines that make any fucking difference: "[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities" and ""... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime...”

And then it comes back to what Rosenstein said, “If the lawyers cannot prove the case in court, then whatever the fuck delusion you believe in is fucking irrelevant” ... fucking "I-R-R-E-L-E-V-A-N-T".

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

First...precedent was made with Watergate regarding accessibility to evidence and rules are made to be changed

the so-called Watergate rules no longer apply

Second... the Russian sympathizers haven’t read it either and the notes are documented evidence of possible obstruction. That’s for the Congress to investigate.

No. it was for Mueller to recommend indictment/impeachment, NOT "leave it to Congress"
Mueller is a failure. He doesn't know his stuff! bbhahaha, in reality as a Republican he is of course a deep covert operative who is baiting the Democrats to impeach Trump on nothing thus destroying any chance to defeat Trump in 2020.

Third...trump’s nature sure appears to be denying the Russians attacked the election period. If he’s not being the private server of Putin he’s writing love letters to Kim

your nature is you hate Trump.

The same Graham who referred to trump as a idiot, con man, kook and recently wrote to Mueller about testifying in the Senate. A day after the “it’s over” statement. Lindsey Graham is a perfect example of what happens to a dummy after the ventriloquist dies.

Graham knows what the term "Political Rhetoric" means. Do you?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Why is the trump regime so bent on no one seeing the underlying evidence of the report.

It's "the law." But I recognize that after 8 years of the Obaminable Regime and Eric HoldemUp in charge, "the law" doesn't mean shit to you people....err.... The SocialistLiberalAntiTrumper People .... like you! That's the advantage of having someone who abides by "the law" as opposed to political hacks who make emotional decisions depending on how the wind blows. Remember Ferguson? And "Holder's Investigation"! Obaminable didn't even apologize to the cop!

Nor did he apologize to this one ....



Oh, shit! That's a two-fer .... there's Old Uncle Joe!!!! The beer drinking, pussy grabbing DNC leader for 2020. Laughing at a cop!!!!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

First...precedent was made with Watergate regarding accessibility to evidence and rules are made to be changed

You really didn't post that did you? You really ought to prove read your remarks before you "send them"!

[LexusLover]

I'm NOT grappling with the words ....

...... "by means of bribery" .............

...... "criminal investigator" ....

https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-1...sect-1510.html

(a)  Whoever willfully endeavors by means of bribery to obstruct, delay, or prevent the communication of information relating to a violation of any criminal statute of the United States by any person to a criminal investigator shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

This thread is about impeaching Barr ....

.. we can "discuss" these words "a violation of any criminal statute" later, after the first two are addressed.

[Jaxson66]

[QUOTE=LexusLover;1061464581]It's "the law." But I recognize that after 8 years of the Obaminable Regime and Eric HoldemUp in charge, "the law" doesn't mean shit to you people....err.... The SocialistLiberalAntiTrumper People .... like you! That's the advantage of having someone who abides by "the law" as opposed to political hacks who make emotional decisions depending on how the wind blows. Remember Ferguson? And "Holder's Investigation"! Obaminable didn't even apologize to the cop!

Nor did he apologize to this one ....




Oh, shit! That's a two-fer .... there's Old Uncle Joe!!!! The beer drinking, pussy grabbing DNC leader for 2020. Laughing at a cop!!!![/QUOTE

I’m a staunch defender of capital punishment and believe it be should be used more often. I’ve owned guns since I was ten years old and support stricter background checks. Now I own weapons that really should be removed from the market. I’m pro choice because it’s not my goddamn business.
I don’t think the Socialist Liberal Anti Trumper club will let me join, so turn all that insight on your yourself.

BTW I’m already in a club! The International Association of Firefighters and I’m sure your aware who we support.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

I’ve owned guns since I was ten years old ....

BTW I’m already in a club! The International Association of Firefighters and I’m sure your aware who we support.

You just exposed your intellectual deficiency, which may be why membership in a "club" might be a challenge for you ....

"10-year-olds" don't "own" shit.

Just because one is a "firefighter" doesn't mean he or she is not Anti-Trump and/or a SocialistLiberal. That is stereotyping based upon vocations and/or activities. BTW: Why would you use the IAF as a group to provide you "authenticity" as to political perspectives and/or affiliations?

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

This thread is about impeaching Barr ....

.. we can "discuss" these words "a violation of any criminal statute" later, after the first two are addressed.

Article 1, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried the Chief Justice shall preside; And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Judgement in Cases of Impreachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgement and Punishment, according to Law.

I guess the GOP DOESN'T think the Attorney General's duty is an honorable one. Only partisan. Right?

You get impeached. YOU get impeached! EVERYONE GETS IMPEACHED ! ! !

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

I guess the GOP DOESN'T think the Attorney General's duty is an honorable one. Only partisan. Right?

You get impeached. YOU get impeached! EVERYONE GETS IMPEACHED ! ! !

So impeach Trump. Go for it.


See where that gets you in 2020.