Beginning of the end for stock bubble?

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Christian is code for idiot, most of the time. Illiterate? Me? Are you sure you want to go there?

I DID go there swishy walker !

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

I DID go there swishy walker !

You're so gay, your butthole has its own butthole

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

You're so gay, your butthole has its own butthole

You WISH that everyone was just like your cum guzzling, gloryhole guru ass woomby ! That way YOU can get TWICE the fudge packing in per shift at the 'holes ! You can experience real world economics then woomby, by having MORE of YOUR mojado gente slamming your sorry well pounded ass and charging more per shift !!! You can REALLY build up the crust on those brown sheets then woomby ! Pobrecita puta y maricona !!

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

You WISH that everyone was just like your cum guzzling, gloryhole guru ass woomby ! That way YOU can get TWICE the fudge packing in per shift at the 'holes ! You can experience real world economics then woomby, by having MORE of YOUR mojado gente slamming your sorry well pounded ass and charging more per shift !!! You can REALLY build up the crust on those brown sheets then woomby ! Pobrecita puta y maricona !!

You're so gay, your tears are made of sperm.

[bigcockpussylicker]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Do you really think a thread on here will influence the direction of the markets?

I was making remark toward the constant talking headings on news shows trying to scare people to boost ratings

[MC19]

Originally Posted by MC19

RL, since all you who OWE cjohnny54$ for 4, that why your government have government housing project and public transportation.... sell all your shit

I steal think it the people/quality ... not all men are created equal ...

can't make me walk up the stair to the 3 floor can you ... what happen when gov. does not set aside enough of their taxes for science/engineering research and higher education ... some of you will find ways to STEAL using advance technology but set aside for new swimming pool ....let steal cjohnny54$ from the state of the union to do it ...... hahahahahahahahahahaha


untitled.PNG


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jw9nKQP-F1Q

[gfejunkie]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I thought we were talking serious money

Originally Posted by gfejunkie

You will be when gasoline goes to $2.00 a gallon.

I filled up at Sam's Club this morning. $1.99 a gallon regular.
Oil prices heading south again today.
September is not historically a bullish month.

[MC19]

Originally Posted by gfejunkie

I filled up at Sam's Club this morning. $1.99 a gallon regular.
Oil prices heading south again today.
September is not historically a bullish month.

the summer driving season is over, guess what

[Guest032516]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Jesus Christ. The form of government is republic, but it's democratically chosen? Ok, let's examine this turd as I search for a clean end.

The system of government we have is a republic. Not only are a republic and a democracy different, they're mutually incompatible.

A democracy is rule by majority. The minority has no protection whatsoever. This is true regardless of whether you're discussing direct or representative democracy. This is why the founding fathers were smart enough to select a republic, protecting individual rights and the tyranny of the majority. A democracy does not place importance on individual rights. It is simply majority rule. A republic, by its nature, is constructed to protect the rights of the minority against the majority.

Your lack of understanding of governmental forms is appalling. You make the same dumb debating points that a high school anarchist makes.

We live in a democracy, idiot. The FORM of government is a republic.

You say that a democracy and a republic are mutually incompatible.

I would point out that you previously pointed out that GERMANY is an example of a socialism and democracy. BUT YET, Germany is actually are republic, isn't it, mope? You can't even keep your story straight.

We live in a representative democracy - as opposed to a theocracy, an autocracy, a monarchy, and oligarchy, etc.

We could have chosen to have a parliamentary system, like England, which is also a representative democracy. But we chose a republic to spread power. But that doesn't make us any less of a democracy, since power still rests in the people.

You seem to think that since we do not follow absolute majority rule (in which 51% of the people can vote to piss in the cornflakes of the other 49%) that we are not a democracy. That's idiotic. You are thinking of an absolute, direct democracy, which doesn't exist anywhere in the world.

The Bill of Rights also limits the power of government by preventing the majority from imposing its absolute will. Does that mean we can't be a democracy because we have a Bill of Rights?

If you chose to respond to this, you must first address your contention that Germany (which is a republic) is a social democracy despite the fact that you ALSO contend that a republic is mutually incompatible with a democracy.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by ExNYer

Your lack of understanding of governmental forms is appalling. You make the same dumb debating points that a high school anarchist makes.

We live in a democracy, idiot. The FORM of government is a republic.

You say that a democracy and a republic are mutually incompatible.

I would point out that you previously pointed out that GERMANY is an example of a socialism and democracy. BUT YET, Germany is actually are republic, isn't it, mope? You can't even keep your story straight.

We live in a representative democracy - as opposed to a theocracy, an autocracy, a monarchy, and oligarchy, etc.

We could have chosen to have a parliamentary system, like England, which is also a representative democracy. But we chose a republic to spread power. But that doesn't make us any less of a democracy, since power still rests in the people.

You seem to think that since we do not follow absolute majority rule (in which 51% of the people can vote to piss in the cornflakes of the other 49%) that we are not a democracy. That's idiotic. You are thinking of an absolute, direct democracy, which doesn't exist anywhere in the world.

The Bill of Rights also limits the power of government by preventing the majority from imposing its absolute will. Does that mean we can't be a democracy because we have a Bill of Rights?

If you chose to respond to this, you must first address your contention that Germany (which is a republic) is a social democracy despite the fact that you ALSO contend that a republic is mutually incompatible with a democracy.

I must? You don't tell me what the fuck, shitbird. I'm the one telling you how it is.

"The United States is, indeed, a republic, not a democracy. Accurately defined, a democracy is a form of government in which the people decide policy matters directly--through town hall meetings or by voting on ballot initiatives and referendums."

Little light reading for you, bonehead.

http://www.thisnation.com/question/011.html


How you like them oil prices, btw. On the uptick, lookout OPEC is also signaling they've had enough and want to meet with other major exporters to talk about cutting production. They've had enough of the low prices. Told you fuckers.

[CuteOldGuy]

We didn't start out as a democracy, but we became one, which is why the country is going to hell. Democracy will devolve into tyranny, which is where we are headed.

[Guest032516]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I must? You don't tell me what the fuck, shitbird. I'm the one telling you how it is.

"The United States is, indeed, a republic, not a democracy. Accurately defined, a democracy is a form of government in which the people decide policy matters directly--through town hall meetings or by voting on ballot initiatives and referendums."

Gee, is there any reason why you stopped at that sentence and didn't go on to the following:

"By popular usage, however, the word "democracy" come to mean a form of government in which the government derives its power from the people and is accountable to them for the use of that power. In this sense the United States might accurately be called a democracy."

Once again, your intellectual dishonesty is telling.

And, BTW, yes, you MUST go back and explain your contradictory statements regarding Germany, a democracy and a republic .

Otherwise, you are no better than JDBarleycorn refusing to answer in the thread about the Malaysian airliner.

If you want, I can start a thread entitled "Paging WombRaider! Paging WombRaider!"

Now get to it, mope.

[DSK]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I must? You don't tell me what the fuck, shitbird. I'm the one telling you how it is.

"The United States is, indeed, a republic, not a democracy. Accurately defined, a democracy is a form of government in which the people decide policy matters directly--through town hall meetings or by voting on ballot initiatives and referendums."

Little light reading for you, bonehead.

http://www.thisnation.com/question/011.html


How you like them oil prices, btw. On the uptick, lookout OPEC is also signaling they've had enough and want to meet with other major exporters to talk about cutting production. They've had enough of the low prices. Told you fuckers.

Great call on oil - when to sell?

[Yssup Rider]

JL is looking for trading tips here on ECCIE.

How special!

Somebody tell him a lie, cheat on his handle or try to get him to keep up his end of a bargain!

Then "advise" him how to dispose of his oil contracts.

[Texas Contrarian]

Sorry to be so late to this thread, but ...

Originally Posted by ExNYer

Well, if you have been checking the news, you know today was hideous for the global stock markets:

http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-stoc...ses-1440159610

Does anyone else think we are about to dip into another recession?

We have printed money and piled up debt, but we have not reached a point where we can pay down debt or where the economy grows so fast that the national debt shrinks as a percentage of GDP.

So, there may be nothing to "prime the pump" with if another recession kicks in. Economists have been warning about this.

So, any predictions on what happens next?

If it goes south, how will progressives blame it on Bush instead of Obama?

Just a few observations:

Of course, the little "mini-panic" is now over, but all the uncertainties causing investor angst continue unabated.

But I don't believe that necessarily means that we are close to dipping into a recession. We could be, but recessions have a way of stubbornly refusing to announce their arrival in advance. A couple of generations ago, Professor Samuelson (who wrote the texts used by millions of university students over the last half-century) famously wrote that equity markets had predicted "nine out of the last five" recessions!

As history clearly demonstrates, even the smartest and most credentialed observers are terrible at predicting recessions. We could be heading into one soon, or it may be that the next one will begin two, three, or even four years hence. But we will have one sometime (rarely do we go more than 7-8 years without a recession, and we're already a few months past the 6-year mark of the last one's ending). And the equity market downturn accompanying the next recession won't simply knock 10-12% off an overvalued equity market -- it will slaughter it, likely taking it down 30-40%, or possibly even more.

Investors should always be prepared for bear markets, especially at times like these when valuations are so high. In my view, most people have no idea how much fragility and instability there is in the world's financial systems. Astonishingly, that includes many finance journalists.

For savvy players, there should be no shortage of juicy opportunities over the next 5-10 years -- both on the long and short side, and at various times and under continually changing sets of conditions.