Women's Rights on Trial Today

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by bb1961

Your new go to word..."boring" sounds like first grade shit!! You talking about the Constitution and rights...priceless!!
You're such a fraud.

Boring and unoriginal you Red-state cartoon. Give me a good reason to troll you. It sounds like you're decently educated. Like you understand what Hannity is hypnotizing you with.

Be yourself, psycho.

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...de_146809.html

Even pro-abortion advocates do not defend Roe on its merits. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg publicly criticized the decision for its invented doctrine and judicial overreach.

Ginsbug didn't like it either and shes liberal.

When I clicked the link, it gave me a weird verification test. Usually the squares that have a common element. This time I had me to move a puzzle piece. Ever seen that?

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...de_146809.html

Even pro-abortion advocates do not defend Roe on its merits. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg publicly criticized the decision for its invented doctrine and judicial overreach.

Ginsbug didn't like it either and shes liberal.

Before Gloria Steinem became the nationally recognized activist for abortion rights and feminism, she was a 22-year-old living in England and pregnant when she didn't want to be.


"The question is whether it will be done in safety or not," Steinem told NPR's Mary Louise Kelly. "That is the simplest way of putting it, and that is what the court has to decide."

Overturning the right to abortion would be a step toward making the U.S. an authoritarian country, Steinem says.

"Controlling reproduction has always been the first step in any hierarchical or authoritarian government," she said. "In this still-patriarchal time, looking to control the one thing they don't have is the first effort in creating a hierarchy."


"Freedom of speech is not different from freedom of reproduction."


Mary Ziegler is a law professor who studies abortion rights. She says that other rights, including access to birth control and in vitro fertilization, might be in play as well, partially because what abortion is defined as is contested, too.


When the decision on the Mississippi case comes next year, Ziegler says, she and others will be looking to see whether it signals a move by justices that could open the door to overturning other established law.

"I think what we're really going to be looking for is we know there are camps among the conservative justices about how far to go, how quickly," she says. "We just don't know how large each of those camps are, and we'll be looking for signs of that."

[eccieuser9500]

The one good thing that could come from Gavin Newsom trolling the Supreme Court


https://www.vox.com/2021/12/14/22832...ssault-weapons

Texas drafted SB 8 specifically to prevent it being stopped by a federal court. Ordinarily, someone who wishes to challenge a state law in federal court must sue the state official charged with enforcing that law. But the most important provisions of SB 8 can only be enforced through private lawsuits. On Friday, the Supreme Court essentially gave its blessing to this scheme, ruling that the only people who can be sued are state health officials who play an insignificant role in enforcing SB 8.


The hypocrisy of a decision allowing states to neutralize a right favored by Democrats, but not a right favored by Republicans, is obvious. But, honestly, we should hope for hypocrisy. We should hope that the worst thing that comes out of Jackson is an unprincipled decision holding that Jackson is a one-off case that applies to abortion and nothing else. For, if Jackson is allowed to stand unmodified, it threatens the very notion that states are bound by the Constitution.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

The one good thing that could come from Gavin Newsom trolling the Supreme Court


https://www.vox.com/2021/12/14/22832...ssault-weapons

I tell you what the one off thing is...thinking that the hypocrisy will not continue with this Court.

Any Court that could justify slavery....has broad powers to justify any and all laws, not matter how restrictive.

The Judicial fight is over....the religious right has won.

[eccieuser9500]

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by WTF

I tell you what the one off thing is...thinking that the hypocrisy will not continue with this Court.

Any Court that could justify slavery....has broad powers to justify any and all laws, not matter how restrictive.

The Judicial fight is over....the religious right has won.

How amiable do the Christian Conservatives feel about the rise in Muslim population?


Muslims are a growing presence in U.S., but still face negative views from the public


https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...om-the-public/

Over the last 20 years, the American public has been divided on whether Islam is more likely than other religions to encourage violence, and a notable partisan divide on this question has emerged. When the Center first asked this question on a telephone survey in 2002, Republicans and Republican-leaning independents were only moderately more likely than Democrats and Democratic leaners to say that Islam encourages violence more than other religions – and this was a minority viewpoint in both partisan groups. Within a few years, however, Republicans began to grow more likely to believe that Islam encourages violence. Democrats, in contrast, have become more likely to say Islam does not encourage violence. Now, Republicans are far more likely than Democrats to say they believe Islam encourages violence more than other religions.

[winn dixie]

Well! If the shoe fits........

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

She’s dead.

.... She's DEAD?!

... Hmmmm... Wonder if she'll VOTE in the mid-terms?

### Salty

[eccieuser9500]

Made you look.


A dinosaur embryo was found inside a fossilized egg from over 66 million years ago


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...gg/8988395002/

The dinosaur, an oviraptorosaur, is closely related to birds and part of the therapod group. Therapods were carnivorous dinosaurs with small forelimbs that walked on two feet, like other creatures in that group such as the Tyrannosaurus rex and the velociraptor.

But a distinct feature scientists noticed about the embryo was it shared a very similar pose to birds before hatching, something thought to be unique in the animal kingdom.

[winn dixie]

Wonder what that sum bitch woulda tasted scrambled??

[eccieuser9500]

Like . . . was gonna say chicken. But this egg came before the chicken.

[Yssup Rider]

But the rooster came first.

[eccieuser9500]

Hey, psycho! Yes I believe in human right.



Battle of the Sexes Begins in Womb as Father and Mother’s Genes Tussle Over Nutrition


https://neurosciencenews.com/fetal-g...trition-19850/

Lead author Dr. Miguel Constância, said: “One theory about imprinted genes is that paternally-expressed genes are greedy and selfish. They want to extract the most resources as possible from the mother. But maternally-expressed genes act as countermeasures to balance these demands.”

“In our study, the father’s gene drives the fetus’s demands for larger blood vessels and more nutrients, while the mother’s gene in the placenta tries to control how much nourishment she provides. There’s a tug-of-war taking place, a battle of the sexes at the level of the genome.”

The team say their findings will allow a better understanding of how the fetus, placenta and mother communicate with each other during pregnancy. This in turn could lead to ways of measuring levels of IGF2 in the fetus and finding ways to use medication to normalise these levels or promote normal development of placental vasculature.

[winn dixie]

Well?

He did Say So lolling