I am praying ‘Dump Trump’ doesn’t fire or silence Dr. Anthony Fauci.

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by DirtyDJ

Yeah I don't think global warming really has a lobby. Who would that be? Big Solar Panel? lol Maybe one day

See that just tells me you don't know shit about the academic world. There's a metric ass ton of money available to anyone in a lab coat willing to prove what the donor wants.

But stay ignorant.... at least we can count on your consistency.

[Aoi]

Originally Posted by texassapper

See that just tells me you don't know shit about the academic world. There's a metric ass ton of money available to anyone in a lab coat willing to prove what the donor wants.

But stay ignorant.... at least we can count on your consistency.

The fact that he referred to climate change as being true because "99 percent of scientists agree" shows how utterly ignorant and washed he is of critical thought.

Newsflash! Science isn't a democracy! If 99 scientists believe that the law of gravity wasn't true and that 1 scientist did, who would be right?

DURRRRRRRRRR.

[Grace Preston]

No matter what your stance is on any particular interest-- a search of the internet will find you at least one thing to support your stance. Its called Confirmation Bias... and much like porn.. you can literally find anything you want to find if you search hard enough.

[futbolhead]

Originally Posted by Aoi

The fact that he referred to climate change as being true because "99 percent of scientists agree" shows how utterly ignorant and washed he is of critical thought.

Newsflash! Science isn't a democracy! If 99 scientists believe that the law of gravity wasn't true and that 1 scientist did, who would be right?

DURRRRRRRRRR.

You went through the trouble of thinking through an argument against a 99% consensus? Damn, son..
Delete your account or at least take a break.

[Aoi]

Originally Posted by futbolhead

You went through the trouble of thinking through an argument against a 99% consensus? Damn, son..
Delete your account or at least take a break.

"Against a 99% consensus"?

So science is about how many peoples agrees with each other? Not empirical evidence, researching and testing?

Funny, were all 99 percent of these people right about when they thought the climate was going to rapidly cool and that didn't happen.. then they thought it was going to rapidly warm.. and turns out, that also didn't happen and now their verbiage is "change"?

LOL. Bruh.

Something tells me you don't understand the scientific method.

I suggest you learn this before thinking you are in a position to lecture me. When your argument is "More people agree with me," you have lost.

[oeb11]

Quote- You can pay a scientist to say literally anything. Big Oil pays scientists to find things a certain way just like Big Tobacco paid those same scientists to find that cigarettes didn't cause cancer. Go read the book Industrial Strength Denial. 99% of scientists will tell you global warming is a very serious problem. Maybe not for you but for future generations.



OP of this post - it is meaningless - the Figure 00% was fabricated to fit the poster's own pre-determined conclusion.

If OP wishes to clarify - post the scientific studies, authors, and references to document the 99% figure.

Won't happen - it is a fabricated figure and not scientifically supported.



Perhaps this thread should be in the Political forum.

Let the DemLibs post in comedy corner - much more appropriate




earth has been in a warming cycle for 11,000 years - since the end of the last ice age. how much of global warming is man-produced CO2 and how much is natural cycle - is unknown.

Earth has been an ice ball planet - and a water world. These cooling and warming cycles occur for unknown reasons - Yet the NYCrimes and LSM want to terrify the American public to jump on the Sanders/AOC soylent Green New Deal bandwagon to impose a socialist authoritarian rule on Amerika - and dispose of the Constitution.

DemLibs are serious about it - and plan to have it in place by 2030.

Communism, bread lines, and universal poverty ala Orwell's 1984 are the reality of the promise.



And - how much effect on the global climate will occur - when the Soylent Green new Deal excludes China, Russia, Europe, southAmerica, and the rest of the world??????


Still - demLibs don't ask questions of their Rulers - they just toe the narrative Line!


And use patronizing insults as arguments when criticized.

Not the scientific method - but then - Teacher's Unions teachers think Math and Science are 'Racist" plots.

Because they are incompetent to teach the subjects.

[texassapper]

Don't forget that US emissions have been dropping despite not joining the last climate accord. EU and China... well they actually increased their CO2 output if I remember correctly... despite being signatories.

Everything a politician does is aimed at taking money from people who earned it and giving it to people who haven't... and skimming for themselves in the process. There is a reason they all leave Congress wealthy...