Quote:
Originally Posted by VerySkeptical
The election has been covered by CNN, Time, CBS, WaPo, NYT, etc. And what story has the WaPo gotten wrong that they didn't correct?
|
It's not a question of getting the story "wrong" as much as it's making the (Ohio primary) election front-page news beforehand, then burying the outcome afterwards deep within their print and online editions, so few people will see it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VerySkeptical
The first paragraph of his statement told how big a headline the primaries were.
At the end of his statement he claims it was barely covered.
What an asshole.
|
Now you're the liar. The Ohio primary race was a headline before the ballots were cast and counted. Once it became clear the Trump-endorsed candidate won, the result was barely covered. You make it seem like Trump contradicted himself when he didn't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
|
No, munchy's post is very UNTRUE. There were two elections. Both were given MSM attention prior to the votes. After the votes, the one in Texas (where the Trump-endorsed candidate lost) garnered most of the MSM attention while the one in Ohio (where the Trump-endorsed candidate won) was downplayed.
Your Newsweek link corroborates this. The headline is about the TX primary. The reader has to wade halfway through the story before the OH primary is mentioned.
C'mon speedy. You understand how media bias works. It can be brazen and egregious, or subtle and nuanced. Fortunately, most Americans are smart enough to recognize both types of bias.
