Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 281
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70817
biomed163485
Yssup Rider61136
gman4453309
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48761
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42984
The_Waco_Kid37293
CryptKicker37225
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-05-2021, 02:53 PM   #1591
texassapper
Valued Poster
 
texassapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 19, 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,329
Encounters: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by royamcr View Post
I'd accept any court case that looked at the evidence and convicted anyone of fraud. How many court cases have been tossed out because of no evidence? 70 now? Here's what happens, trump and associates claim all this fraud in media, but when it goes to court the judges (even trump appointed judges) look at what they have and kick them out of court. Trumptards keep saying "it's coming", well where is it? We're waiting.
Has there been a court case that reviewed the alleged evidence yet? Or have all the Court cases been dismissed by lack of standing? Does lack of standing invalidate evidence?
texassapper is online now   Quote
Old 08-05-2021, 03:27 PM   #1592
SpeedRacerXXX
Valued Poster
 
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: Georgetown, Texas
Posts: 9,330
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by texassapper View Post
Regardless of party affiliation, if there were fraud at the levels being alleged, then the election officials were likely involved... Do you think they would verify that there was fraud that they were a part of?

Therefor you're essentially saying there is no way to prove fraud ever.
Why would people who have openly supported Donald Trump be involved in voter fraud to keep him from being reelected?

Even though your response borders on the ridiculous, I'll make it easier on you.

Give me an unbiased 3rd party who has substantiated any of the claims of voter fraud and provided any proof to support the allegations.
SpeedRacerXXX is offline   Quote
Old 08-05-2021, 03:39 PM   #1593
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

ta has a valid point
SR will never , ever, ever admit the fraud of teh corrupt, power mad DPST party to which he kneels in obedience.
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 08-05-2021, 04:40 PM   #1594
texassapper
Valued Poster
 
texassapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 19, 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,329
Encounters: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX View Post
Why would people who have openly supported Donald Trump be involved in voter fraud to keep him from being reelected?
Are you one of those fools that thinks we have two opposing political parties rather than a ruling elite and everyone else they view as a serf class?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX View Post
Give me an unbiased 3rd party who has substantiated any of the claims of voter fraud and provided any proof to support the allegations.
Who would you qualify as an unbiased 3rd party?
texassapper is online now   Quote
Old 08-05-2021, 05:49 PM   #1595
royamcr
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 7, 2010
Location: OPKS
Posts: 7,240
Encounters: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by texassapper View Post
Are you one of those fools that thinks we have two opposing political parties rather than a ruling elite and everyone else they view as a serf class?

Who would you qualify as an unbiased 3rd party?
Anyone not and never has been a trumptard or in any way associated with trump. Then the same as a supervisor.
royamcr is offline   Quote
Old 08-05-2021, 06:36 PM   #1596
Jacuzzme
Premium Access
 
Jacuzzme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 16, 2016
Location: Steel City
Posts: 8,088
Encounters: 44
Default

Why would we consider someone anti Trump unbiased? It was one biased side who clusterfucked the election, they’ll obviously never admit it so it’ll have to be the other side responsible for unfucking it.
Jacuzzme is online now   Quote
Old 08-05-2021, 09:06 PM   #1597
royamcr
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 7, 2010
Location: OPKS
Posts: 7,240
Encounters: 38
Default

There is only one person that clusterfucked a free and fair election. No fraud has been proven in 9 months.
royamcr is offline   Quote
Old 08-05-2021, 09:08 PM   #1598
royamcr
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 7, 2010
Location: OPKS
Posts: 7,240
Encounters: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by texassapper View Post
Has there been a court case that reviewed the alleged evidence yet? Or have all the Court cases been dismissed by lack of standing? Does lack of standing invalidate evidence?

That is how courts work, early on there is a discovery process where evidence is shared. Oh there is no evidence? Case closed.
royamcr is offline   Quote
Old 08-05-2021, 09:31 PM   #1599
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,714
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VerySkeptical View Post
The election has been covered by CNN, Time, CBS, WaPo, NYT, etc. And what story has the WaPo gotten wrong that they didn't correct?
It's not a question of getting the story "wrong" as much as it's making the (Ohio primary) election front-page news beforehand, then burying the outcome afterwards deep within their print and online editions, so few people will see it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by VerySkeptical View Post
The first paragraph of his statement told how big a headline the primaries were.
At the end of his statement he claims it was barely covered.
What an asshole.
Now you're the liar. The Ohio primary race was a headline before the ballots were cast and counted. Once it became clear the Trump-endorsed candidate won, the result was barely covered. You make it seem like Trump contradicted himself when he didn't.


Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX View Post
Very true. The election was covered by most networks before and after the election...

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-blame...n-lost-1616204
No, munchy's post is very UNTRUE. There were two elections. Both were given MSM attention prior to the votes. After the votes, the one in Texas (where the Trump-endorsed candidate lost) garnered most of the MSM attention while the one in Ohio (where the Trump-endorsed candidate won) was downplayed.

Your Newsweek link corroborates this. The headline is about the TX primary. The reader has to wade halfway through the story before the OH primary is mentioned.

C'mon speedy. You understand how media bias works. It can be brazen and egregious, or subtle and nuanced. Fortunately, most Americans are smart enough to recognize both types of bias.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 08-05-2021, 09:42 PM   #1600
royamcr
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 7, 2010
Location: OPKS
Posts: 7,240
Encounters: 38
Default

Nobody really gives a shit about Ohio primary anyway. It is a nothingburger. There were 100s of other primaries not covered. It is a local thing.
royamcr is offline   Quote
Old 08-05-2021, 09:45 PM   #1601
Redhot1960
Valued Poster
 
Redhot1960's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 11, 2019
Location: United States
Posts: 3,626
Default



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhddPnxDWvI
Redhot1960 is offline   Quote
Old 08-05-2021, 11:54 PM   #1602
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,714
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by royamcr View Post
Nobody really gives a shit about Ohio primary anyway. It is a nothingburger. There were 100s of other primaries not covered. It is a local thing.
Except when trumpy endorses someone who loses, as in Texas. Then it becomes national front-page news.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 05:42 AM   #1603
Jacuzzme
Premium Access
 
Jacuzzme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 16, 2016
Location: Steel City
Posts: 8,088
Encounters: 44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by royamcr View Post
That is how courts work, early on there is a discovery process where evidence is shared. Oh there is no evidence? Case closed.
That’s definitely NOT how courts work. At all.
Jacuzzme is online now   Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 07:18 AM   #1604
SpeedRacerXXX
Valued Poster
 
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: Georgetown, Texas
Posts: 9,330
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by texassapper View Post
Are you one of those fools that thinks we have two opposing political parties rather than a ruling elite and everyone else they view as a serf class?

Who would you qualify as an unbiased 3rd party?
I'll make it even easier for you.

Give me an allegation that YOU believe has been substantiated as significant voter fraud in Arizona or Georgia.

If you say Dominion servers changed votes from Trump to Biden supply proof that that happened.

If you say illegal voters voted for Biden in the thousands supply prooof that that happened.

If you say votes were rescanned several times provide proof that that happened.

Remember that a hand recount of votes was done in Georgia and the results matched the machine output.
SpeedRacerXXX is offline   Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 07:24 AM   #1605
SpeedRacerXXX
Valued Poster
 
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: Georgetown, Texas
Posts: 9,330
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
.

C'mon speedy. You understand how media bias works. It can be brazen and egregious, or subtle and nuanced. Fortunately, most Americans are smart enough to recognize both types of bias.
All I can say is I read about the Ohio results the very next day.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/0...lection-502351

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/03/polit...lts/index.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/03/u...ike-carey.html

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...io/5477960001/

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ele...-ohio-n1275875

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...rimary-in-ohio

https://www.yahoo.com/now/trump-back...014200949.html

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/tru...io-2021-08-04/

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/trump-s-...ohio-1.1636258

https://www.rollcall.com/2021/08/03/...15th-district/
SpeedRacerXXX is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved