Quote:
Originally Posted by Wakeuр
What does anything in the above post have to do with the topic?
|
DJ's topic or yours?
The former? Everything. The later? Nothing. But that's "the plan," isn't it?
Disparate rule interpretation is offensive to most fair-minded individuals. Disparate application of rules is disgusting, particularly when the leniency is applied to the "administration" of the organization, who use their "office" to assert their "superior" position in the community.
Sometimes the discriminatory behavior is called to the attention of the offending individuals who were unaware of the activities and how they were viewed with positive results, because they realized they were wrong. Other times that's just the way they want to conduct and operate their business, so they ignore the comments and continue on with their offensive behavior.
Your "comment," WU, is consistent with the later.
BP's posts, from my recollection, have always been positive contributions to the community without name-calling, insults, rebukes, and/or otherwise offensive in content. What he just posted is truth, as "painful" as you, as an "investor," may think it. It is worthy of notice and respect, unless one is participating in a policy of restricting the number of providers who may benefit from the Houston forum in furtherance of some "hidden" agenda of facilitating any value of advertising on this board in the Houston forum when coming to the Houston area to a select group of "approved" providers .....
so your frequent response, WU, is ... "Don't bother."
More rudeness.
