Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 400
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 283
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70831
biomed163764
Yssup Rider61318
gman4453378
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48843
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37431
CryptKicker37231
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-08-2011, 05:13 PM   #136
bojulay
Valued Poster
 
bojulay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 30, 2011
Location: I can see FTW from here
Posts: 5,611
Encounters: 8
Default

We live in a republic governed by a constitution. Democracy by itself can lead to
great evil. What if the majority of a people are radical muslim, then sharia law can become their constitution. Scary. We happen to have the best constitution out there, and attacks will always come against it wheather by false interpretation,
or some group trying to establish some erroneous amendment. ( The false idea of an evolutionary constitution ) Or just the plain old ignoring of it.


In all fairness the fair tax could lead to a huge black market for
goods and services. I see a potential for millions of under the table
deals. Who is going to regulate that. Close one door open another.
bojulay is offline   Quote
Old 11-08-2011, 06:35 PM   #137
Doove
Valued Poster
 
Doove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 19, 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 7,271
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
Doove, the Constitution isn't so much a document that WE must follow, it is a document that the GOVERNMENT must follow.
Entirely irrelevant. The point is that you, more than anyone in here, all too often don't even bother to try to argue something on its own merits. Instead, you simply throw out that it's what your interpretation of the constitution says as if that's all that matters. Only when you don't like what the Constitution allows do you want the argument to be about the individual merits of what's under consideration.

When "as per the Constitution" is your only argument in half your discussions, then i can only wonder, why is that not your argument when referring to the income tax?
Doove is offline   Quote
Old 11-08-2011, 07:14 PM   #138
dilbert firestorm
Valued Poster
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anaximander View Post
There are no inconsistencies with our
Founding documents. The means by
which certain Amendments were 'passed'
leave a lot to be desired. Have you read
the Amendment establishing the IRS?
It is one of the most overreaching laws
established in this Republic. Congress
can raise taxes irregardless of regional
populations, percentage of tax is decided
by Congress- in short the govt says it
may take what it wants, when it wants,
as often as it wants, from whomever
it wants.
And I'm to believe my fellow citizens
gave the govt the right to grift by
a plurality of the electorate?

Nope nothing doing.

Our Founding Fathers were not mere
17th century people. The govt they
conceived had not existed since
ancient Athens. The govt would be
a servant of the people, the people
were their own master.
Whereas so called 'modern' govt forms
are in fact retreads of tyrannies of old.
Progressives aren't espousing anything
that pharoah's, kings, and kahns haven't
pushed on the people before.
Progressives espouse what in practice
can only be described as a mix of the
worst aspects of plutocracy and
oligarchies.

Our Founding Fathers were highly
distrustful and opposed to strong
cent govt. Hence the 10th Amendment.
They were aware that it would be
possible for their creation to get
corrupted over time. In the
Declaration of Independence the
Framers left instructions on what
to do when the govt became dismissive
of the voice of the people.
It's what the 2nd Amendment is all about.
The 2nd Amendment is not about hunting,
unless you count hunting traitors and
civic enemies of the State.
Take up arms, rise up, forcibly throw them out.

That's why libs and progressives dislike guns.
When the time comes they know what end
of those guns they will likely see.
A few of you have guns; not enough to
even make it fair. Everyone I know is
capable of equipping at least 6 of their
neighbors with longarms and ammo
if they weren't armed already.

Ballots first
Bullets next
last time that happened, the South lost the war.
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 11-08-2011, 09:47 PM   #139
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Doove, the income tax is wrong. The amendment should be repealed. We've done it before with prohibition. I would also repeal the 17th Amendment. Neither of those amendments reflect the vision of our Founders as a free republic. The Constitution itself is flawed, but it is the best that humans have come up with in centuries. And it is NOT irrelevant that the Constitution puts restraints on government. That is the POINT of the Constitution. I want government to stay within the Constitution and out of my business.

Make a rational argument and you will get a different response. Normally you are so far left field I can't make sense of what you try to say.

But thanks for the entertainment.

CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 05:21 AM   #140
Doove
Valued Poster
 
Doove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 19, 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 7,271
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
Doove, the income tax is wrong.
So is letting poor people rot. "But the constitution, the constitution..." you say.

You really don't see how you're a hypocrite in this, do you?
Doove is offline   Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 07:14 AM   #141
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

No, I do not. Please enlighten me. Thank you.

CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 07:35 AM   #142
catnipdipper
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 23, 2010
Location: kansas city
Posts: 2,126
Default COG-contradictions

Truth=Old Guy

Patent Lie=Cute

You are what we call a Midnight Oasis, it's late and Miss America ain't coming in.
catnipdipper is offline   Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 07:52 AM   #143
Laz
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 14, 2011
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 2,280
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doove View Post
So is letting poor people rot. "But the constitution, the constitution..." you say.

You really don't see how you're a hypocrite in this, do you?
You assume that the states will not provide for those in need within their state. We are not saying screw the poor we are saying that the problem should be solved at the state level like the Constitution requires. Those closest to the problem are the best at determining a solution. It is also much easier to change the government at the state level than it is at the federal level.
Laz is offline   Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 07:58 AM   #144
dilbert firestorm
Valued Poster
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laz View Post
You assume that the states will not provide for those in need within their state. We are not saying screw the poor we are saying that the problem should be solved at the state level like the Constitution requires. Those closest to the problem are the best at determining a solution. It is also much easier to change the government at the state level than it is at the federal level.
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 08:00 AM   #145
dilbert firestorm
Valued Poster
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doove View Post
So is letting poor people rot. "But the constitution, the constitution..." you say.

You really don't see how you're a hypocrite in this, do you?
why does every thing have to start and end at Washington D.C..?
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 09:41 AM   #146
Texas Contrarian
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2009
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 3,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
I'm a hypocrite because I don't like the 16th Amendment. ??
No, you're a hypocrite because you disagree with Doove. In his mind, that apparently constitutes prima facie evidence of hypocrisy!
Look at what Doove said in post #123:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doove View Post
...And i won't even get into the hypocrisy from Captainmidnight in all this.
What?!? This is just ridiculous.

What "hypocrisy" from me "in all this?" This is my first post in the entire thread!

Doove cannot point to any instance where I exhibited hypocrisy, here or anywhere else in the forum, without twisting, weaving, and projecting. He needs to get over his continuing obsession with this.

It's actually quite humorous to read some of this crap! From now on, I'm simply going to try to be entertained by clowns like this.
Texas Contrarian is online now   Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 10:15 AM   #147
anaximander
Valued Poster
 
anaximander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2, 2011
Location: san antonio
Posts: 572
Encounters: 5
Default wrong, entirely different circumstances

Quote:
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm View Post
last time that happened, the South lost the war.
Not true. I suggest you reread Civil War history and what
led up to it. But to play with your game, the North
is not the industrial giant now that it was then.
The Southern states are in a much better
position now than then.

In case you didn't know or were unaware,
Texas was never conquered by Union forces.
The very last battle was fought here.
And the Union forces lost.
Texas capitulated because you can't have
a Confederacy of one.

Remember the numbers
Union casualties: 300,000
Conf. casualties: 150,000
And that was with advantage to the North.

Now? ehh not pretty.
Truly dread mon.
anaximander is offline   Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 10:23 AM   #148
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by catnipdipper View Post
Truth=Old Guy

Patent Lie=Cute

Hey, two out of three ain't bad.

Oh, and you missed out. Some clown on here called me an arrogant asshat. That's better than anything you have called me. You've met your match, my friend.

CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 10:28 AM   #149
Guest050715-1
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 2746
Join Date: Dec 17, 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 7,168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doove View Post
You can worship wherever you damn well please. Just keep it out of my face.
Agreed. I'll support anyone's right to worship who and how they want…………but,



…………the Big Guy says this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexTushHog View Post
Why do you want to worship in "public places"?

5 And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.

6 But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.


Matthew 6:5 - 6 (KJV)
I think that Christianity or any religion needs to be left at one’s threshold. I know it is hard to disassociate from one’s religious beliefs, but truly, I am not concerned with others’ beliefs; I am only interested in mine. That is not to say I want others to believe as I do, because I believe everyone has the right to worship any deity they choose. I just don’t want to be subject to anyone else’s beliefs. Personally, I feel the radical fundamentalist Christian movement has don’t nothing but hurt the Christian cause and the people that the fundamentalist Christians wish to subjugate to their Puritanical beliefs. Basically it has become a policy if “It would make me feel better about myself is you’d just do, act and think as I would like you to.” I have no time for it, and all it serves is to make the rest of us angry, amused or both. In my case, both.
Guest050715-1 is offline   Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 01:44 PM   #150
anaximander
Valued Poster
 
anaximander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2, 2011
Location: san antonio
Posts: 572
Encounters: 5
Default what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander

Quote:
Originally Posted by OliviaHoward View Post
Agreed. I'll support anyone's right to worship who and how they want…………but,



…………the Big Guy says this:



I think that Christianity or any religion needs to be left at one’s threshold. I know it is hard to disassociate from one’s religious beliefs, but truly, I am not concerned with others’ beliefs; I am only interested in mine. That is not to say I want others to believe as I do, because I believe everyone has the right to worship any deity they choose. I just don’t want to be subject to anyone else’s beliefs. Personally, I feel the radical fundamentalist Christian movement has don’t nothing but hurt the Christian cause and the people that the fundamentalist Christians wish to subjugate to their Puritanical beliefs. Basically it has become a policy if “It would make me feel better about myself is you’d just do, act and think as I would like you to.” I have no time for it, and all it serves is to make the rest of us angry, amused or both. In my case, both.
How about practice what you preach. Not so much you
per se, rather the side you espouse.
School for example should be about educating
instead we get indoctrinating.
Our kids are out of the top 5 nations in
science and math. But they know about condoms
and that same sex relationships are normal.
Our kids feel better about themselves than
kids in other nations- great self-esteem
based on nothing of substance.

I am unaware of any public prayer rallies
wherein any trouble was caused.
It's not believers raping girls in tent villages,
wrecking parks with trash and human waste,
causing businesses to lose money,
having all night drug parties in the tent villas,
defecating on police cars,
or running around naked with children present.
So I am a bit confused as to what christians
have done other than reject the gay mafia's
attempt to culturally legitimize their degenerate
lifestyle and oppose any earth worship in the
form of ecoillogical junk being proseletyzed
to their children.

Well okay we have managed to reverse
majority opinion against RvW.
We'll have to change hearts,
before we change the law.
Know this: RvW will be repealed/rescinded
in my lifetime. I am surer of this than
the Sun rising every morning.

You ain't seen nothing yet.
anaximander is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved