Why is Impeachment such a forbidden topic?

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by bigtex

LLIdiot, to be more precise, you are an arrogant, egotistical, condescending Idiot.

Do you feel better now?

Gotta agree.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Just pity for you, that's all.

Save your pity for someone who actually wants it ... you arrogant, egotistical, condescending Jerk, errrrr Idiot!

Before I forget, Happy Thanksgiving!

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

"Wantonly?" Prove that. or is that yet another of your editorial opinions, Mr. Pull-putzer?

"Unlike his predecessors"? That's a fucking lie. Period.

You're not even flirting with accuracy in this statement, IBIdiot. Your flat-out lying.

For a change.

admit it or prove otherwise.

Poop puffer... your bar-e started wars in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Egypt, Ukraine, Israel and the USA... Owantonly.

[nevergaveitathought]

Originally Posted by southtown4488

.a president whos only crime is being a democrat is not a reason to impeach, at least not to a reasonably capable adult.

It's tantamount to treason to be a democrat

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

It's tantamount to treason to be a democrat

Yea! these aren't old school democrats, these are Commie/Fascist/Marxist/ Stalin/Mao types... fuckem

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Gotta agree.

Considering the collective intellectual and "anal-ytical" wisdom of the two of you, that is actually complimentary .. Keep up the cut and pasting.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by bigtex

Save your pity for someone who actually wants it ...

I can't remember having pity for anyone who "wants it," because one usually only has pity for those who can't help themselves and recognize their deficiencies as you seem unable to do. Or, privately, do you?

And when you celebrate Thanksgiving I hope you remember why we do, and realize it's not recognizing the dismantling of the values this country was founded upon, but constructing and developing a positive and productive future for all free from continued Government meddling and wealth re-distribution programs.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by lustylad

It's called healthy and vigorous debate. Something you and the Austin Reacharound Crew know nothing about.

That's why they voted for Obaminable. Gruber has explained their votes.

The only ones distancing themselves from Gruber are the Liberals who initially endorsed him and his fraudulent representations to get legislation passed.

Thank God Ferguson, Missouri changed the front page headlines! For them!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

In the "real world", LL, the Court ruled in Nixon that regarding impeachment, there is no judicial review; and there never has been.

Back "on point" ... every case you read in which "impeachment" is discussed is overtly a "judicial review" of the impeachment process. The distinction, and it is an important one recognized by the Court in Nixon, the facts in Nixon had to do with the "trial" in the Senate and NOT THE IMPEACHMENT IN THE HOUSE.

It is almost elementary .. apples and oranges. That IS the real world. I see it frequently in others' research in which the rely on the "headnotes" and "syllabuses" to justify the use of a case, when a critical examination of the discussion in the case and the facts of the case render the case irrelevant. Or as you all have done, pluck out a line in the opinion and attempt to apply it to another fact situation.

That's why you guys want to change the scope of my point. "Impeachment" is in the House of Representatives, which does have enumerated "standards" upon which it can base Articles of Impeachment. It was not an ISSUE in Nixon, because Nixon had ALREADY been convicted of a "high crime and misdemeanor" by definition...... "bribery."

BTW, I hope you don't think I get "concerned" about what an "editor" at Justia has to say about the law .... when "we" have a guy in the White House who was the "Chief" editor of the Harvard Law Review (as well as a "Constitutional Law Professor) and he is constantly in trouble with the Supreme Court, and hopefully coming up to bat to get struck out again with his newly crafted immigration legislation that exonerates at least 5 million criminals from their crimes.

But you all go about your fantasy of "impeaching" Obminable.

It's not a "forbidden topic."

It's a waste of time, if which "we" don't have a lot.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

And when you celebrate Thanksgiving I hope you remember why we do, and realize it's not recognizing the dismantling of the values this country was founded upon, but constructing and developing a positive and productive future for all free from continued Government meddling and wealth re-distribution programs.

I will make a deal with you!

I will not try to tell you how to celebrate Thanksgiving and you don't try to tell me.

You arrogant, egotistical and condescending Idiot!

How's that for a deal?

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Poop puffer... your bar-e started wars in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Egypt, Ukraine, Israel and the USA... Owantonly.

That is a total fabrication.

Do you even know what he word wanton means?

You always act out for the holidays, don't you Simple Jack?

Odouchebag!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by bigtex

I will make a deal with you!

I will not try to tell you how to celebrate Thanksgiving and you don't try to tell me.

You arrogant, egotistical and condescending Idiot!

How's that for a deal?

I didn't "tell" you how to celebrate anything, and normally at this point in the discussion I would TELL you to Kiss my Ass ... but I'm particular about who I ask to do that just in case they desire to accommodate me.

But in the meantime, when considering the source, I still consider it a compliment for you to call me an "idiott" ... particularly since you know "soooooo" much about me.

Which reminds me ... have you seen my "file" yet?

I don't make deals with fools. They never seem to work out.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

It's tantamount to treason to be a democrat

Explain yourself.

You sound like IBIdiot's second favorite fascist.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Explain yourself.

He can't.

Just remember thought ... in his mind ...

.................it's only treasonous to be a "democrat."

If you are Democrat it's not.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

I don't make deals with fools. They never seem to work out.

Thanks for letting me know that you don't make deals with yourself. I don't blame you, I prefer not to make deals with arrogant, egotistical, condescending Idiot's either.

BTW, Happy Thanksgiving!