Trump to be arrested on Tuesday

[bambino]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...mp-case-video/

Bragg withheld 600 pages of exculpatory information from the Grand Jury.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

So you admit that some were armed. Finally some progress.

I have never said everyone was unarmed.

The undercover FBI agitators in the crowd were clearly armed.

And I would not doubt that there were a very small handful of protestors with concealed carry . That said, I do not recall one of the protestors pulling or using a gun so it is plainly idiotic to claim this was a mob that was going to overthrow the government

Even you would agree that this group was not going to overthrow the government and know that anyone making such claims is so clearly ill-informed that it is embarrassing.

Meanwhile Bragg's grand jury cancels today's meeting so he can draw out the fake drama even longer. Just like a typical crazy ass leftist trying to claim his 10 minutes of fame

[bambino]

https://t.me/c/1428896786/772844

Bragg might get charged with Prosecutorial misconduct!!!!


BAHAHAHAHA

[bambino]

Turley skewers Bragg

https://t.me/realKarliBonne/159870

[Devo]

Originally Posted by berryberry

I have never said everyone was unarmed.

The undercover FBI agitators in the crowd were clearly armed.

And I would not doubt that there were a very small handful of protestors with concealed carry . That said, I do not recall one of the protestors pulling or using a gun so it is plainly idiotic to claim this was a mob that was going to overthrow the government

Even you would agree that this group was not going to overthrow the government and know that anyone making such claims is so clearly ill-informed that it is embarrassing.

Meanwhile Bragg's grand jury cancels today's meeting so he can draw out the fake drama even longer. Just like a typical crazy ass leftist trying to claim his 10 minutes of fame

DC is impossible to get a carry permit for residents, and basically there is no way for a non resident to carry any weapon legally, and you don't fight wars with 38 special revolvers.

So, if you are serious, you'd have an arsenal to begin with as, you are screwed even with a flintlock.

That's whats so freaking silly about the whole "Insurrection" thing, I have more firepower within reach of the keyboard I am typing on that was in that entire crowd, insurrection my lily white ass.

[Charley3]

Originally Posted by berryberry

I have never said everyone was unarmed.

The undercover FBI agitators in the crowd were clearly armed.

Of course they were. Because all undercover FBI agitators wear their “FBI Undercover Agitator” armband. Lol

This has to go up there in ECCIE hall of fame ridiculous statements. OMG

Bahahahahahahaha

[bambino]

Back on topic;

https://t.me/sharirayepatriots/46671

Interesting take

[HDGristle]

Originally Posted by berryberry

I have never said everyone was unarmed.

We accept that your bar continues to move and appreciate your efforts to come towards the middle despite the continued obfuscation and misdirection. It's understandable.

Very nice to see progress on your part.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by bambino

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...mp-case-video/

Bragg withheld 600 pages of exculpatory information from the Grand Jury.

... The case has just COLLAPSED like a tin shithouse roof!

Me political "Insiders" are saying that 2 of the
Grand Jury there have RESIGNED! ... A girl - I don't know
her name... And Mark Pomerantz... One o' Cyrus Vance's crew.

Not sure IF it was Bragg - or the other two -
that hid the evidence... Not sure IF any of the three
will face Disciplinary Action and/or Disbarrment. ...

... Crikey! ... What a Turn of Events! ...

#### Salty

[bambino]

https://t.me/SaltyCrackerNews/18081

BOOM

[HDGristle]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

Me political "Insiders" are saying that 2 of the
Grand Jury there have RESIGNED! ... A girl - I don't know
her name... And Mark Pomerantz... One o' Cyrus Vance's crew.

Do your insiders know the difference between the prosecutors and the grand jury?

Are they the NY Times?

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/23/n...stigation.html

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by bambino

https://t.me/SaltyCrackerNews/18081

BOOM

well this throws a big wrench in Bragg's case, yeah? one of the things he must show is that Cohen was reimbursed by the Trump Org implying the money really came from the Trump campaign. that's the only way possible Bragg can make this a felony campaign violation. that i know of, no records Cohen provided shows that and Cohen stated Trump eventually reimbursed Cohen as a private individual. i recall hearing, maybe incorrectly, Cohen testified the Trump Org issued him a check. even if true the Trump Org is not the Trump campaign so no violation of campaign laws. Trump is free as a private citizen to use the Trump ORG .. a privately owned entity he owns, to reimburse Cohen. if the money actually came from a personal check by Trump, you'd think Cohen has the record yeah? then where is it, Mikey?


as long as it didn't come from an account by the Trump campaign there is no violation of campaign finance laws. period.


this of course is what the DOJ and FEC both concluded 3 years ago and decided there was no violation.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michae...Stormy_Daniels


Cohen told The New York Times in February 2018 that he paid the $130,000 to Daniels from his own pocket; he also said that the payment was not a campaign contribution and he was not reimbursed by either the Trump Organization or the Trump campaign.[88] The Washington Post later noted that, by stating that he used his own money to "facilitate" the payment, Cohen was not ruling out the possibility that Trump, as an individual, reimbursed Cohen for the payment.[89] In April 2018, Trump acknowledged for the first time that Cohen has represented him in the Stormy Daniels case, after previously having denied knowledge of the $130,000 payment.[90]


GAME OVER.

the DOJ knew there was no case. the FEC knew there was no case. Cyrus Vance, Bragg's predecessor as DA knew there was no case. now Bragg thinks he has a case based on a flimsy untested linkage to a never used post Civil war regulation with a so-called intentional fabrication of business records to link the Trump Org to the Trump campaign. by the way the statute of limitations to bring the base claim, intentional falsification of business records, has expired. it expired while Vance was DA and he let it expire because he knew there was no case to bring.


let's not forget that Bragg's "star" witness, Cohen, is a known perjurer.

brilliant!!!

[bambino]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

well this throws a big wrench in Bragg's case, yeah? one of the things he must show is that Cohen was reimbursed by the Trump Org implying the money really came from the Trump campaign. that's the only way possible Bragg can make this a felony campaign violation. that i know of, no records Cohen provided shows that and Cohen stated Trump eventually reimbursed Cohen as a private individual. i recall hearing, maybe incorrectly, Cohen testified the Trump Org issued him a check. even if true the Trump Org is not the Trump campaign so no violation of campaign laws. Trump is free as a private citizen to use the Trump ORG .. a privately owned entity he owns, to reimburse Cohen. if the money actually came from a personal check by Trump, you'd think Cohen has the record yeah? then where is it, Mikey?


as long as it didn't come from an account by the Trump campaign there is no violation of campaign finance laws. period.


this of course is what the DOJ and FEC both concluded 3 years ago and decided there was no violation.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michae...Stormy_Daniels


Cohen told The New York Times in February 2018 that he paid the $130,000 to Daniels from his own pocket; he also said that the payment was not a campaign contribution and he was not reimbursed by either the Trump Organization or the Trump campaign.[88] The Washington Post later noted that, by stating that he used his own money to "facilitate" the payment, Cohen was not ruling out the possibility that Trump, as an individual, reimbursed Cohen for the payment.[89] In April 2018, Trump acknowledged for the first time that Cohen has represented him in the Stormy Daniels case, after previously having denied knowledge of the $130,000 payment.[90]


GAME OVER.

the DOJ knew there was no case. the FEC knew there was no case. Cyrus Vance, Bragg's predecessor as DA knew there was no case. now Bragg thinks he has a case based on a flimsy untested linkage to a never used post Civil war regulation with a so-called intentional fabrication of business records to link the Trump Org to the Trump campaign. by the way the statute of limitations to bring the base claim, intentional falsification of business records, has expired. it expired while Vance was DA and he let it expire because he knew there was no case to bring.


GAME OVER

Actually, Vance was a FEDERAL prosecutor. And a Commie Trump hater. He decided no case. Bragg who is a NYC prosecutor followed suit. But hey, Soros dumped a million into Braggs re-election campaign. So here we are.

[bambino]

https://t.me/BoldSpearElmerFudd/116708

[bambino]

��BREAKING: New Bombshell Document DESTROYS Manhattan DA’s Case Against Trump

2018 Letter from Michael Cohen’s lawyer to the FEC declares Cohen used his own personal funds to pay Stormy Daniels. Trump Camp. NOT party to transaction, did NOT reimburse Cohen for payment. It’s OVER


https://t.me/BoldSpearElmerFudd/116716