Quote:
Originally Posted by bojulay
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bojulay
So she actually saw the dude and BBBJ is a typo for CBJ.
Now I remember why I said I wouldn't get involved in these
drama threads anymore.
Dose anyone need a good used Kenwood Stereo??
|
And these attempts to derail this thread won't make things any better...keep on topic or find another thread of interest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TinMan
It just seemed like the original issue had been resolved from the standpoint of both parties..I know one thing here its not the first review reported by the OP to not be real.
But the train-wreck-watching side of me appreciates your position.
|
If the issue is resolved it can die a natural death like all thread should and usually do however there is still some value to the thread here..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sophia Banks
The best info I got out of this and hopefully other providers that read this is to avoid this client that wrote a fake review or makes "typos".
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by melannie_star
I can vouch for Cheyenne.. I have visited with him on more than one occasion. I remember him because he did bring me some itty bitty cute outfits! lol.. He was a very sweet, fun and respectful guy.. every activity on my review of me was 100% lol.. but I'm a freak like that. I'm sorry you are going through that Ember and really do not see the reason behind him writing a fake review. Maybe it was a mistaken identity? Who knows..
Edit: Ok now after reading through this whole thing.. I'm such a loser on a Friday night.. haha! What a mess.. LMAO..
Anyway, Cheyenne, I am sorry you had to go through all this just for a " typo" .. I still stand behind him being a great guy ladies!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ember Simmers
Update:
The reviewer finally messaged me. And texted me. And yes I saw him.
So the issue is solved - no help from the mods though in any of it!
They still haven't fixed the TYPO.
I apologize for the harassment he is now receiving from people.
|
So first he's discredited and sworn by the provider that his review is fake but then retraction happens? By demand here the provider wanted immediate action upon the reviewer only to go back and retract! Pretty much here is the reason why the guideline exist, its perfect demonstration. Now it become a question of credibility.