Who and who not to see

[Coltrane Too]

True Story.

I contacted a well known provider via her website email contact page. I didn't hear from her. A year to the day I sent the contact, she e-mailed me and asked when I wanted to meet. I told her the e-mail was a year old (LOL). We both got a laugh out of it. Long story short, I ended up meeting her for a session!

[Guest030911]

Originally Posted by technicallygeek

My apologies, my reply had a dry tone as well.

Classy post. I am sure we will get to know you well enough, too.

Have fun and be safe!

[technicallygeek]

Originally Posted by cpi3000

Classy post. I am sure we will get to know you well enough, too.

Have fun and be safe!

I certainly hope so. I may have nothing better to do than to screw around on here while I work but I certainly mean no harm. All the other forums Im registered with are not half as fun as this one.

[humble&horny]

Originally Posted by fortwortholdguy

Yep...drier than a popcorn fart!!!

Now can we just all learn how to live together? kumbayaaaaaaaa

wtf is a popcorn fart?

[jfred]

I don't stop by here as often as I did at The Old Place . Looks like it's just as well since everyone's getting along fine.

technicallygeek (may I call you tg?) two things: (1) I didn't refer to anyone as a hooker. Those words came from your mind. True, I put them there, but it's not the same as uttering it myself. Literary license, ya know?

(2) What to call ourselves is not in universal agreement and I don't really feel the need to apologize when I do, in fact, use the term hooker. I also like Ladies of the Night. Do you find that objectionable?

The Hobby and Hobbyist are terms I resisted at first. They are so "secret society". But they work in conversation with other Hobbyists. So I got used to it. I'd say on this board (though but a newbie here) that gentlemen would do well not to be offended by the general nomenclature that other gentlemen use to describe sexual service providers, which, by the way, is what I consider the most neutral and accurate term available. Shorthand is Provider.

My favorite naughty little hooker loves to refer to herself with exactly those words. I use it mostly as a term of endearment. If you ever catch me here slinging it intentionally and with malice, feel free to call me out. Otherwise it's kumbaya for me, too. So don't give another thought to your insult.


P.S. If you don't already know it, you will find CPI3000 to be a font of information and perspective. He is not only experienced but also wise. Happily, he gives generously of his wisdom to other Hobbyists. (To Providers he simply gives generously.) I tell you this because it is true, not because he WK'ed me earlier in this thread.

P.P.S http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...popcorn%20fart

[rakuguy]

The whole screening and scheduling gauntlet has always seemed overly daunting for me personally. If I ever run out of beautiful AMP girls to see I may take the Indy plunge some day. That's a pretty big if though. Don't know how you guys do it. Especially newbies breaking into to Indyworld. Seems like such a beating. I understand the Indy universe necessarily requires lots of hoops to jump through (for everyone's sake) but I guess it's just not my cup of tea...at least at this point in time. Guess I'm more of an impulse hobbyist. The time between my getting the urge to hobby and actually hobbying is usually about 30-45 minutes tops depending on drive time not to mention the luxury of having multiple backup plans on site. Pretty damn sweet. Guess I'm just extremely fortunate that my preferred providers have the most convenient business model for my situation.

[TexRich]

If a provider blows you off, then she is probably saving you money. I usually go buy some clothes with the money I would have used one her.

[scenicroute]

Anybody else remember a body rub girl in Arlington named Barbie who used to insist you email a photo to see if you were up to her "standards". She had some decent reviews but I wouldn't know as apparently I didn't make the grade.

[jfred]

Originally Posted by scenicroute

...She had some decent reviews but I wouldn't know as apparently I didn't make the grade.

Mmm...I did. She was among my first.

Her screening peculiarities were the subject of some controversy, of course. She had a legitimate massage business in a middle-class salon, hair, nails, the works. I think her massage+ customers were just icing on the cake and she wanted to have that kind of fun with guys that met some personal standard she liked. Plus, you did have to parade past the other service areas of the salon to reach her spot, so maybe it was a vanity thing with the other girls there. Who knows?

If you clicked with her there weren't any limits. But everything you did had to be at a sound level that wouldn't alert the nice south Arlington ladies outside that crimes of passion were going on behind that second door on the left. The energy normally released in a "full-throated" orgasm had to be diverted to other means of release.

It was kind of S&M'ie in a mild way. She was hot.